dark light

GoldenDragon

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,771 through 1,785 (of 2,918 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Pictures, news and speculation thread #2653901
    GoldenDragon
    Participant

    Good work Hyperwarp, I never put two and two together even after looking at those pictures forever!

    It looks more and more like the J-10 won’t be public at the Zhuhai air show this year.

    According to a Chinese-language forum post Zhuhai’s local paper is reporting the FC-1 to be at the forefront of the show. In fact, the FC-1 is “officially” named as China’s “most advanced light fighter plane.” So the main focus is on the FC-1 (like it was last time in 2002.)

    in reply to: Pacific Fighters- IL-2 Sturmovik sequel! #250135
    GoldenDragon
    Participant

    Holy sh1t! They have the Brewster Buffalo! And they show it being shot up (which was what it did in the Pacific War.)

    I love that fat little farker.

    in reply to: China and Backfires AGAIN!? #2656649
    GoldenDragon
    Participant

    The Hong Kong media has proven in the past to be notoriously unreliable when reporting, or making claims about the PLA and it’s various arms. I have had the word from some more reliable sources on China’s arms not to trust Hong Kong rags.

    Does Kopp not know this, or again, is he just producing dribble to get paid?

    The HK papers follows the Murdoch way of doing things.

    They don’t necessarily lie but they do tend to jump to the most sensationalistic conclusions possible to sell the most copies. Sort of the reverse Occam’s Razor Principle 😀

    American (and Australian) “China Threat” analysts tend to use the same deducing methods 😀

    Laser dazzler = Satellite Killing Space Particle Beam
    700 Chinese oil workers = 700,000 PLA soldiers in Sudan
    etc.

    in reply to: Thai AF: Chicknes for fighter jets talks #2656664
    GoldenDragon
    Participant

    The recent Indonesian FLANKER deal was also largely settled with the barter of commodities. Nobody got angry with that. I believe frozen chicken can be good for up to 6 months or perhaps more, or is that fish? I am not sure.

    Probably less than 6 months. Meats get the distinctive “freezer flavor” after a few months in storage.

    I think it would be a better deal if the Thais bartered for a few An-225s and then use them to airlift the frozen chicken out of the country quicker before they spoil.

    If they airdropped the chicken in the middle of a Russian winter, there wouldn’t be any need for refrigeration.

    in reply to: airbus a-400 #2656732
    GoldenDragon
    Participant

    The A400M’s future is practically guaranteed, imho. The An-70 would have been an alternative if Germany had opted for it.

    The C130J is considered too light and C-17 too heavy (a classic excuse to say a particular plane is chosen already even before competition starts :D)

    There is a huge difference between the A400M and the EF2000. Airbus has a track record of success. The plane will be built and the members will buy – over 200 are already agreed to by member nations (France, Germany, Spain, Belgium, Italy.)

    The UK might possibly opt for C-17 since they’ve leased four and are very happy with them but they have earlier commited to the A400M also.

    Nope, I can’t see anything but a success even if its Europe alone unless they really screw up during development like losing a prototype. I don’t it’ll happen. Not under Airbus and not with a lock on the home market.

    Also, the A400M is tied into France’s and Germany’s dream of a standing European army. The vision is that a massive fleet of up to 300 A400s will be able to airlift the European rapid reaction force to Africa, the Middle East or even Central Asia (though that might make the Russians angry.)

    in reply to: Thai AF: Chicknes for fighter jets talks #2656754
    GoldenDragon
    Participant

    I just remember that this is not the first time that a westernized Asian military is buying Russian weapons through barter.

    South Korea got T-80s mbts and BMP-3 apcs as payments for debt that the Russians owed Seoul. Russia simply doesn’t have the hard currency and military stuff is about the only finished product that it could trade (Russia is loath to barter raw material like oil or titanium which represents hard currency on a far more equitable level.)

    Russia still owes Seoul a few more billions so there might be more coming. I don’t recall why S Korea chose apvs over aircraft.

    If Thailand gets the chicken deal, the Chinese Sukhoi customer should be pi$$ed. China had to barter textiles like good silk shirts and ties for the Su-27SK (as will as 50-60% hard currency.)

    Thailand is gonna get the plane by trading for it with a perishable like frozen chicken. The Thais are good businessmen 😀

    in reply to: Antonov An-124 #2657019
    GoldenDragon
    Participant

    Airbus also uses a ship to ferry the most massive pieces of the A380 around Europe.

    The Ville De Bordeaux was delivered from Nanjing Jinling Shipyard to Airbus around April.

    http://english1.people.com.cn/200405/02/images/airbus.jpg

    ———————————————————————-
    Notes:
    (1)http://www.defense-aerospace.com/cgi-bin/client/modele.pl?prod=34541&session=dae.4856522.1094166907.QTepe8Oa9dUAABRuL-c&modele=jdc_1
    “The Airbus A380 program has reached a new milestone with the christening of a roll-on and roll-off sea (ro-ro) vessel built for the transportation of components of the aircraft. The vessel was named “Ville De Bordeaux” at a ceremony held today in Nanjing in East China’s Jiangsu Province.

    The 5,200-dwt roll-on and roll-off vessel measures 154.15 meters long, 24 meters wide and 21.85 meters deep and features the largest-ever watertight stern door on a ro-ro vessel (22 meters by 14 meters). It has a cargo deck space of 6,720 square meters and holds as much as 1,805 lanes meters. It incorporates special features tailored to the loading and transport of aircraft components like stern mooring system, cargo hold environment control, lashing arrangements and control of accelerations.

    Airbus will charter the vessel to transport A380 sections by sea from Airbus sites in the UK, Germany, France and Spain to the French city port of Bordeaux. The vessel is built by the Nanjing-based Jinling Shipyard and commissioned by FRET/Cetam, a subsidiary of Louis Dreyfus Armateurs (LDA) of France, and Leif Hoegh of Norway. “

    in reply to: Chinese and Taiwanese Avionics and Radars. #2657128
    GoldenDragon
    Participant

    The GD-53 radar for the F-CK-1.

    It’s full name is the Golden Dragon radar. A mark of quality.

    in reply to: Nimrod MRA4 first flight #2657144
    GoldenDragon
    Participant

    Shrink and post them!

    Say, Alastair, the Nimrod is very unfortunately named for a descendent of the pretty Comet. In American parlance, a “nimrod” is a common playground insult.

    Of course, the R1P version of the Nimrod is almost as bad as All Nippon Airlines’ ANAL logo http://www.aapairlines.org/images/memberairlines/NH.jpg in world of aviation designation and naming.

    in reply to: Antonov An-124 #2657156
    GoldenDragon
    Participant

    They still could use a few hundred orders or so, don’t forget the An-70 has been screwed immensely by Russia and mishaps over the last few years.

    Mostly by mishaps. When both your first and second prototypes suffer crashes, it doesn’t bode well.

    in reply to: China becomes first export customer for S-300PMU2 #2058122
    GoldenDragon
    Participant

    Macau Defense= Mob Guys

    Who won the last round of mob wars in Macau?

    IIRC, it was a four-way struggle between the local Macanese (Chinese-Portuguese) mob, the Big Circle Boys from China, the Hong Kong 14K Triad and the Macau police. There was a cameo performance from the Russian mafia who were importing blondes for the casinos.

    The gangsters from either side tried to get the Portuguese police chief, Baptista, several times. But the real big war was between the HK and local mobs.

    I’m not sure who won and whether Macau is under control of the HK Triads.

    Of course, the PLA provides “protection” for both HK and Macau.

    in reply to: Nimrod MRA4 first flight #2657188
    GoldenDragon
    Participant

    Nice pictures, Alistair! The classic lines of the Comet 🙂

    in reply to: Thai AF: Chicknes for fighter jets talks #2657192
    GoldenDragon
    Participant

    “Our chicken exports have been hit by bird flu,” Thaksin told reporters on Tuesday. “When we can’t sell in our traditional markets, we need to penetrate new markets by bartering. We can’t leave all this chicken in Thailand.”

    It is obvious that the driving issue for Thailand is how to get rid of tons of chicken meat it couldn’t sell in its traditional market, not any specific hankering for Sukhois.

    “We can’t leave all this chicken in Thailand.”
    HA HA HA HA HA HA HA

    Sorry.

    in reply to: SR-71 FLight manual online and declassified #2657374
    GoldenDragon
    Participant

    I think the Foxbat leading edges were titanium, but that was about it.

    Hey, you are right. Now that I reread me “Illustrated Directory of Fighters” by Mike Spick (illustrated because I like pictures :D)

    The Foxbat was around 8 percent titanium and those were on the leading edges subjected to the highest heating. The airframe was mainly of nickel steel.

    On the other hand the “SR-71 is virtually a titanium shell wrapped around a huge fuel tank.” Its very airframe was made of titanium.

    in reply to: SR-71 FLight manual online and declassified #2657381
    GoldenDragon
    Participant

    The F-15 can sprint to Mach 2.5, which is a completely different animal than cruising for over an hour at Mach 3.17. Heat is a big issue.

    Quite true. In fact, cruising at such high speed was made possible only by titanium (heat-dissipating ceramics like those for the space shuttle were not in use for aircraft then) so the leading edges won’t melt from heat caused by friction.

    Because titanium could be gotten in the amounts needed only from the USSR, procurement is a great story in itself.

    On the other hand, the Russians themselves didn’t use titanium for Foxbat but extra-heavy nickel steel, almost certainly because the MiG-25 was to be mass produced unlike the Blackbird.

    Nickel steel would melt at a much, much lower lower temperature than titanium. There is no chance that a Foxbat could sustain anywhere near the speed (and endurance at such speeds) of a SR-71 airframe even if its engines could take it.

Viewing 15 posts - 1,771 through 1,785 (of 2,918 total)