Hey … just an attempt to get back to the original topic !!! :diablo: :diablo:
I have to admit, I admire his skills to draw such profiles …
http://aviationgraphic.com/sparta/index.php?pg=illustrator&what=single&aid=5443
If You like, here are more:
http://www.topgunchen.cn/page/album_list.asp?sub_class_id=30
http://www.topgunchen.cn/page/album_list.asp?sub_class_id=31
http://www.topgunchen.cn/page/album_list.asp?sub_class_id=32
http://www.topgunchen.cn/page/album_list.asp?sub_class_id=34
http://www.topgunchen.cn/page/album_detail.asp?album_id=986
Deino
Finally some small progress …
Picture found at the FF via “The Configurator” !
Hmmm … this tread is now almost dead for one year … as dead as the ARH-project: 😮
“As expected, the contract to develop the successor to the OH-58 Kiowa Warrior is again up for grabs.
The Department of Defense terminated Bell’s contract to develop a military variant of the civil 407 helicopter after development costs roughly tripled and the in-service date was delayed four years.
Here’s the DOD’s statement, with the first quote by John Young, undersecretary of defense for acquisition, technology and logistics:
“Rather than continue this program”, Young said, “I have decided that the best course of action is to provide the Army with an opportunity to define a coherent, disciplined Kiowa Warrior helicopter replacement program, and to obtain more rigorous contract terms for its development.”
Secretary of the Army Pete Geren stated, “The cost and schedule that were the focus of the decision to award the contract to Bell Helicopter are no longer valid. We have a duty to the Army and the taxpayer to move ahead with an alternative course of action to meet this critical capability for our Soldiers at the best price and as soon as possible.”
Here’s Bell’s statement:
We are extremely disappointed by this decision and still believe that the ARH-70A is the best replacement for the Kiowa Warrior. The ARH System Development and Demonstration (SDD) contract test aircraft have already accumulated over 1,400 flight hours and have accomplished several important program milestones.
The ARH has proven to be a great performing aircraft and we are in the process of evaluating the impact of this decision and our next steps.And here’s the army’s statement:
“We will rapidly pursue a re-validation of the particular characteristics needed for this capability so that we can restart the process of acquiring a manned, armed reconnaissance helicopter,” said Lt. Gen. James Thurman.
Therefore just a maybe provoking question! Why not choose an UH-72 Lakota-based design as it would offer the benefits of a common airframe, the Lakota was intruduced very quickly and without any severe probles (as far as I know !) … or once again the political battle as it’s an European based design ?
Deino
In the latest AFM issue is a picture of the first Tejas trainer (PV5) made by Saniay Simha … Are there any better ones out there ??? … and why wasn’t it posed here before … ?
Besides that … a Chinese is painting/drawing an Indian aircraft … very nice profile from Topgunchen !
Cheers, Deino
?
Where’d the F-35 come in here? We’re talking about the Su-35BM.
NO …. we are talking about the J-10 (at least that’s what the tread’s title says !)
Once again a tread ruined with all these “my Flanker” is better than Your … xyz-type !
Deino 😡
Diverterless Supersonic Intake.
And what do You think about these images … just concepts, models, fakes or a real project !??
Deino :confused:
Finally !!! 😎
….
Let me put it this way. When Lockheed Martin tells me that the F-16IN (the version that they are hawking to India) is the greatest thing since the invention of the wheel, I have a little bit of skepticism. When Russian sources praise the Su-35 as the super-fighter of the next century, I take it with a large grain of salt. But when Russian sources tell me that one of their arch-rivals for jet fighter sales has produced an airplane that “will beat F-16C or MiG-29/SMT easily,” I have to take that recommendation very seriously.
Thanks for that conclusion !
IT’s not the point if the J-10 is better or equal (Sorry for my post above) … or that he concludes everything only by these few fly-bys …
Thanks, Deino
The title is very misleading.
No where in the article does it say it is better than Flanker.
Typical jounalists…..or did you choose the title yourself Sferrin?
Here’s the link!
http://www.flightglobal.com/blogs/the-dewline/
… and here Your missing statement:
…
I do not think they would buy more Flankers since the J-10 is as good as the Flanker, to say the least.
…
Deino 😀
No idea. Might be for a (potential) new version of the JH-7.
Might as well just be a toy project to demonstrate the benefits of DSI on a JH-7.
Talking successor: Are there any Chinese plans regarding Su-34?
Hmmm ??? First of all IMO that’s no “new stealthy version” of the JH-7 … if real, then its a completely new design as the front fuselage is different, the spine is missing, new intakes and so on.
Your second possibility might be true … even if I don’t hope so.
And regarding the Su-34 … as far as I know officially there are no plans even as a very similar design was once tested in a CHinese wind-tunnel (maybe only for reference !)
Deino
A Russian aerospace journalist, who praises a Chinese fighter with words like
– Now everyone I trust says the Chinese pulled it off, and the J-10 has proven a tremendously successful program.
– The pilot did none of the show tricks like post-stall or tail slide or pitch-back, but turns were very tight, initial rate of turn very high. It was clear there is a lot of potential in this airplane to achieve the same maneuvers more quickly.
– The pilot rarely used afterburner and the degrees of canard deflection were small. Still, the airplane flew very well. I reckon it will beat F-16C or MiG-29/SMT easily.
– Chinese have already completed over 100 J-10s and they have bought more Russian engines for next series.
– I do not think they would buy more Flankers since the J-10 is as good as the Flanker, to say the least.
…
I can’t believe it !!!
Deino 😀
To be honest, I think that’s just a marketing rumour … nothing more !
@ Sens & Distiller
So You think its only an example of a possible future application of an DSI-intake design than a real current project for a JH-7-successor ??
Deino
For all who always wanted to count the rivets on a J-10A !!!
http://www.china-defense.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=23&st=2150
Deino 😮