dark light

Deino

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 2,266 through 2,280 (of 3,089 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: PLAAF News, Photos and Speculation #12 #2468193
    Deino
    Participant

    http://news.xinhuanet.com/mil/2008-09/26/content_10113996.htm

    Essay about Chinese and PLAAF aircraft industry.

    Strange emblems on the PLAAF Su-27/Su-30? Russian?

    No, these are the Su-30MKK’s from the FTTC at Cangzhou-Cangxian.

    Deino

    in reply to: PLAAF News, Photos and Speculation #12 #2469809
    Deino
    Participant

    Hui Tong has an update:

    http://i42.photobucket.com/albums/e338/Hyperwarp/Hobbies/Military/PRC/Air/J-10/Ver-A/J-10_IFR.jpg

    Very nice picture … sadly the number on the tail is too small to identify the unit.

    Besides that there seems to be a different antenna-fit on the back-spine (I think I remember this one on an earlier bird at the CFTE) !

    Cheers, Deino

    in reply to: PLAAF News, Photos and Speculation #12 #2477703
    Deino
    Participant

    JH-7A with LGBby the looks of it..

    I would say it’s a KD-88 with its guidance antennas on the fins.

    Deino

    in reply to: International Air Power Review (IAPR) dead? #2481328
    Deino
    Participant

    Just got a note ….

    Apparently there were some problems with what was going to be the Focus Aircraft feature for issue 25 (= MiG-25) :(, so the JH-7 article has been moved up. 😀
    As a result most of the next issue has to be re-done and that means, of course, that Vol 25 won’t be out for some time yet!

    Cheers, Deino

    in reply to: International Air Power Review (IAPR) dead? #2481629
    Deino
    Participant

    The latets info regarding IAPR publications dates this year:

    VOL. 25 WILL BE ON SALE IN AUGUST.
    ….

    As we are at the end of August and in mind that our US friends received their copies slightly earlier than the others … are there any news ???

    Cheers, Deino

    in reply to: PLAAF News, Photos and Speculation #12 #2487532
    Deino
    Participant

    What PL-11s? They’re not carrying PL-11s, they’re carrying fake PL-8s for wing ballast.

    The planes, with their camouflage patterns, belong to the earlier types and I guess had this sand colored painted over their usual blues. I’m trying to ascertain if the color change is done digitally or this is a real paint over. J-10s with camouflage patterns belong to the FTTC unit, which did many of the operational testing and training, and probably works as an Aggressor unit as well given that the FTTC is home to the PLAAF’s Aggressor units.

    SOC was referring to the last two links in Hyperwarp’s post … not on the shown J-10.

    Regarding the sand-camo … I’m nearly 100% for sure that these are done by PS, esp in the rear area where the PLAAF-symbol is, it looks quite strange.

    I will have to look on my harddrive these pictures look very much familiar …

    Deino

    in reply to: Alenia M-346 #2488189
    Deino
    Participant

    and what about the YaK trainer, which looks almost completely identical?

    … and alos don’t forget the Chinese supersonic version made by Hongdu alias the L-15.

    Deino 😉

    in reply to: Taiwan's IDF Fleet #2490640
    Deino
    Participant

    I don’t know if this has been posted before ?!

    Looks like a huge dispenser or PGM ??? :confused:

    Deino

    in reply to: PLAAF News, Photos and Speculation #11 #2453793
    Deino
    Participant

    Here seems slightly more on this an other fighter types ranging from J-9 to formerly unknown J-13 configurations ..

    http://military.china.com/zh_cn/top01/11053249/20080808/15015313.html

    Can anyone translate PLEASE ???

    Cheers, Deino

    in reply to: J-10 decoys #2454183
    Deino
    Participant

    That picture looks PSed, or at the very least, was cropped in a way to try and make it look like it was the J10 that dropped the flares when in fact it was something else. The scale is all wrong, and so is the position of the flares compared to the fighter.

    Fact of the matter is that we just won’t know for sure where the flares are kept until we see a picture of them emerging from a fighter, or if there is an offical cut-away diagram that marks its location. Since niether of these things have happened yet, to the best of my knowledge, the answer to your question on the location of the flare dispensers is: Your guess is as good as mine.

    You are right, that picture is a photoshoped fake from a J-10 + the flares fired by a Su-27.

    But maybe this picture could help … it looks as the flare-dispensers are located under the PLAAF symbol ….

    Cheers, Deino

    in reply to: PLAAF News, Photos and Speculation #11 #2454187
    Deino
    Participant

    In 1970 the J-9 project was radically altered from a Mach 2 MiG-21 replacement, to a MiG-25 type pure interceptor with a double 27 requirement. That is to say Mach 2.7 and max ceiling of 27,000 meters. This was later lowered to a double 26 requirement, but still well beyond actual capability of the industry at the time and finally canceled in 1980 in favor of the J-8. The J-9 from conception was always described as a single engine turbofan fighter. This is the first time I’ve heard about a twin engine proposal.

    If you can read Chinese:

    http://calf.cn/viewthread.php?tid=29643&extra=page%3D1

    Yes, that was exacly my thought or daubt, especially as far as I know the J-9 this type was only specified with one engine, one tail and a completely different air-intake … !!

    So does this article mentiones directly the J-9 or only a follow on project to the J-9 ???

    If the later then it could be the still rumoured and very secret J-10 heavy interceptor … especially as it looks very similar to this huge fighter model !

    Cheers, Deino

    in reply to: PLAAF News, Photos and Speculation #11 #2456382
    Deino
    Participant

    It would help if you could upload the text instead of just the aircraft images.

    From the few lines available, it seems to suggest this is a follow on to the original J-9 project. The J-9 was a canard delta interceptor canceled after its design specs were unrealistically inflated from a F-4 rival to a MiG-25 rival. Perhaps this concept was floated in an attempt to meet the later design requirements.

    The use of framed canopy windshield and wing fencing suggest this is an older concept.

    Sorry, but I didn’t find more … somewhere at http://military.china.com/
    Hopefully someone else have the whole text.

    Otherwise Your translation would fit to the rumoured J-10 from Shenyang.

    Cheers, Deino

    in reply to: PLAAF News, Photos and Speculation #11 #2456496
    Deino
    Participant

    any idea what fighter or project this is ??

    Just found … :confused: … is it just an interesting CG, a real project, maybe the rumoured SAC J-10 or just a fake ??

    Looks quite similar to that huge delta-winged fighter model from the SAC-display ?

    Thanks in advance, Deino

    in reply to: Stavetti SM-47? #2477273
    Deino
    Participant

    ie. “lots of pretty pictures for uneducated investors to look at” :diablo:

    … but very nice ones !!! :diablo:

    http://www.stavatti.com/MILITARY_AEROSPACE.html

    Have You seen the SM-72 TACTICAL TRANSPORT/SM-73 ASW/MMA

    Deino 😀

    in reply to: Need some help regarding the WS-9 / Quinling ?!!! #2481404
    Deino
    Participant

    It’s me again with some technical data !! Hopefully someone can help me.

    I’m looking for the following specifications of the Spey 202 / WS-9:

    Thrust to Weight Ratio:
    TIT (℃):
    Airflow kg/sec (lb/sec):
    Dry Weight kg (lb):
    Maximum Diameter mm (in):
    Length mm (in):

    Thanks in advance, Deino

Viewing 15 posts - 2,266 through 2,280 (of 3,089 total)