this is why you’re biased Deino. you are cherry picking images to fit your agenda. sure. ignore all the HD quality pictures comparing them from the side.
cherry pick the top down, grainy pixelated low quality picture of the flanker and j-20.
its this pic that you base your 20M from, but you follow it so faithfullyOH LOOK, blow it up in and zoom in
Look how much space in measurement he gave the Flanker.
Sure, the yellow line on the J-20 goes right to the edge of the engine, but look at that huge gap on the flankers tail (maybe about 3-4 pixels), and the gap by the radome.Why don’t you put the j-20 side by side with the flanker. you will see its the same size
But even then my bias does not make the J-20 larger/longer than a Flanker. Maybe the same size like You say, but surely not a 23m-monster.
So You accuse me of being biased since I don’t use a HD-image that is not available, while in return You take any random link, old source or a HD-image of a F-22 without any scale reference … And You are not biased ? You rate Yourself objective ??
Come on, we all have our bias, our favourites and prejudice, but the J-20 can never be longer than a J-15 regardless how much sharper or less blurred a GE image is.
If You show me a HD-image showing right to scale both a Flanker and a J-20 then the J-20 will be at best about the same size —but again it won’t be larger and never 23m long.
I thought You were smarter, but ok. … I’m biased and this is an apple since a strange link just told You.
no, the sides are the worst. you can see how absurdly long it is. look at it compared to an f-22 juxtaposed with the j-20
Sorry, but sometimes I have the feeling You simply need something to mock ! The J-20 is flat, but not extremely long.
Use at least some realistic dimensions. The F-22 is 18,90m long and the J-20 about – based on a comparison to a J-15 side-by-side – about 20,35m … so this is about 1,45 or 1,50 m longer And not as shown in You completely off image.
Anyway … beauty is otherwise always in the eye of the beholder.
Deino
From the news thread (link provided by Tango III)
http://www.nextbigfuture.com/2016/09/current-lockheed-test-pilot-says-china.html?m=1
You really believe in this dated and completely wrong image !??
By the way … it’s so much funny to read such comments:
It basically is a copy as China stole TERAbytes of F-35 data and they pieced together the basic tenets of stealth technology and apply them to its modern aircraft designs.
… even more since some Russian fan boys in return claim it to be a copy of the 1.44 ! :highly_amused:
Anyway …
Deino
Sign In
