dark light

atr42

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 256 through 270 (of 403 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: A question about Radios #1911972
    atr42
    Participant

    Sadly with everything else I have to do these days I very rarely get time to just turn on the radio.
    I have an aerial on the roof which makes a whole world of difference when you’re listening at home.
    I started about 20 years ago with a Win 108. It is battered and bruised and won’t do half of what a modern receiver will do but it is still my preferred radio when at home.
    I have a modern Icom which I take with me to airshows.

    in reply to: Aurigny Update. #549037
    atr42
    Participant

    Sad to see TN depart. She was I believe the last ex CityFlyer ATR that regularly still visited LGW. I had the privilege of working on her from new.
    I don’t know if BA still bring some of the ex CityFlyer RJ100’s in to LGW. If not all the links with the old CityFlyer are now gone.
    Regarding the rearward facing seats this isn’t unusual. We had an old ATR42 with these fitted taking capacity up to 50 rather than 48. If there were two cabin crew on board one would use the FD jump seat if it was full.

    in reply to: Woman breaks back and neck in severe turbulence #553961
    atr42
    Participant

    Three things to remember in turbulence.
    1. Don’t rub your eyes
    2. Don’t pick your nose
    and if your bum itchs, well…….:diablo:

    in reply to: What's on your doorstep #1206776
    atr42
    Participant

    Cheers Baz
    It was driving me nuts not knowing what it was!
    Regards
    Atr42

    in reply to: What's on your doorstep #1206987
    atr42
    Participant

    Fox and Tangmere have just about summed up what we have around here.
    Only thing I can add is the small private strip by Washington VRP. Whoever owns that has some friends with some very interesting aircraft, some of which I don’t know.
    Recently had a single engine low wing mono plane with tri tail and invasion markings flying around. No idea what it is. Had a very nice display by a Harvard this afternoon. Quite often have a small bi plane practising aerobatics in the area.
    Add that to the bits and pieces we see that are obviously out of Shoreham and I think I’m very lucky to live where I do.:)
    PS If anyone wants to offer a flight in any of the above I’ll try very hard to persuade the missus allow me to part with some cash!

    in reply to: The XH558 Discussion Thread (merged) #1207007
    atr42
    Participant

    Very old news. Announced two weeks ago and still showing on the 558 front page for all to see. Moderators can this be combined with the existing thread on 558 or moved somewhere else please?

    in reply to: MAN Viewing Park #556271
    atr42
    Participant

    Compared to the lack of facilities most of us have yes it is still cheap for what you have. I can’t recall what we used to pay at LGW.
    However just to double prices without comment will upset people. Possibly more a communication problem. Giving people plenty of advance notice with reasons why would have been better although not without complaint I suspect.

    in reply to: Ryanair lands on taxiway #556274
    atr42
    Participant

    In fairness to both the airport and the crews we used to have the same problem at LGW. IIRC two incidents of aircraft landing on the taxiway rather than 26R when 26L was non op.
    Solution was just to rewrite the approach plates to emphasise the potential for a mistake and to turn off all the lights when 26L was not in use.
    Not really anyones fault, human error anyone could make if you look at the circumstances.
    The key of course is to ensure everyone accepts all the concepts of human factors and learns the lessons.
    You don’t realise until you work outside of the aviation business how far advanced aviation is regarding human factors training and thinking.:(

    atr42
    Participant

    Signed. If we can preserve the Mary Rose we can do with this ship if the will is there.
    I’ve been following the story for a few years now. Criminal way to treat a piece of history.

    in reply to: General Discussion #350766
    atr42
    Participant

    Just realised something. If the Brawn cars are deemed illegal at the appeal then Lewis Hamilton will now be the winner!
    How crazy is that?

    in reply to: FI team Brawn #1917675
    atr42
    Participant

    Just realised something. If the Brawn cars are deemed illegal at the appeal then Lewis Hamilton will now be the winner!
    How crazy is that?

    in reply to: John Nichol Flies and Airshow World on DVD #1224563
    atr42
    Participant

    Yes please, would like to see them again.
    Personally I have no problem with John Nichol. In fact I’d far rather him than some professional presenter who knows absolutely nothing about aviation.
    I seem to recall he posted on this site some years ago stating something along the lines of he has no problem if some people didn’t particularly like his programmes and encouraging people to have a go at presenting themselves if they thought they could do better. I stand to be corrected though if anyone can find the post.

    in reply to: General Discussion #355160
    atr42
    Participant

    Todays lesson is on the internal workings of an engine.

    in reply to: Whats your caption #1919964
    atr42
    Participant

    Todays lesson is on the internal workings of an engine.

    in reply to: The XH558 Discussion Thread (merged) #1173891
    atr42
    Participant

    Brilliant news. Just been on the site and paid my money.:)
    Personally I don’t think it takes money away from other projects. My view is that projects like this grab peoples attention and get them interested in historic aviation generally and in the long term more people visiting other museums and supporting other projects.

Viewing 15 posts - 256 through 270 (of 403 total)