dark light

SpudmanWP

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 4,849 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • SpudmanWP
    Participant

    Not sure the F-35A would have looked any “sleeker”. Its weapon bay placement (ie the cheeks) is dictated by the mandate of a single, large engine.

    in reply to: 2019 F-35 News and Discussion #2094465
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    That is all part of the mission planning. It will all come down to perceived threat vs available assets. This is why the whole “we only need ‘x%’ 5th gen and the rest can be 4th gen” argument is a fallacy since you will not know what you need… till you need it. It’s better to have it and not need it, then need it and not have it.

    Just look at the start of the 1st Gulf War, Package Q, etc to see all of the planning that goes into it.

    In addition, the F-35 has on-board route-planning that allows not only itself, but the rest of the network to respond to popup threats and reroute or assign a response as needed.

    in reply to: 2019 F-35 News and Discussion #2094469
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    If the presence of popup threats are a threat, then escort F-35s will also likely be present to minimize the likelihood of follow-on F-35s having to dump external stores.

    in reply to: Future of Belgian Air Component #2094735
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    Given that Belgium signed the contracts in Oct of 2018, it is WAY too soon to expect any contracts, of any kind, to be awarded to Belgian companies yet.

    in reply to: Future of Belgian Air Component #2094744
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    Because Belgium is not a JSF partner, they cannot bid on Partnership workshare contracts. The only JSF contracts that they will get are a portion of the contracts that are normally promised to the two primes, LM and P&W. This was done with all previous FMS deals. This is how Israel, Japan, and South Korea have any JSF contracts.

    Belgium can also get other, non-JSF contracts. In either case, the current contracts covering these areas are still in place so they have to expire before they get reassigned.

    in reply to: Future of Belgian Air Component #2094833
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    They need to wait for current contracts to expire then the new ones will be divided up.

    in reply to: Future of Belgian Air Component #2094951
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    Belgiumindustrials were dubious about F-35. Now they are angry and make it known to their politics

    https://plus.lesoir.be/231491/articl…on-de-la-farce

    Paywall and not in English.. no thanks.

    in reply to: Military Aviation News #2095281
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    So.. new member to the ABJ?

    in reply to: 2019 F-35 News and Discussion #2095373
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    This DN series is actually pretty good and thanks to this we got response from LM with current status.

    Any good reporter worth their salt would have reached out to LM & the JPO before going to press in order to verify the info and have the latest status.

    Instead they published a bunch of hit pieces which shows that the purpose was not to inform, but to drive clicks.

    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    If Spear(3?) has a decent NoE mode then it will present a serious threat to any IADS.

    in reply to: 2019 F-35 News and Discussion #2095561
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    These are not new and we knew last year that it had more than a dozen Cat2 deficiencies going into IOT&E, which are these along with a couple that thy discovered. These are also not new in that thy have known about some of them for years but they were low on the priority list.

    in reply to: 2019 F-35 News and Discussion #2095598
    SpudmanWP
    Participant
    in reply to: 2019 F-35 News and Discussion #2095605
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    The tire issue was reported in April.

    A current example of an open category 1 deficiency is with lines on the F35’s landing gear, which can rupture when a tire blows, potentially causing loss of a major aircraft system such as the brakes. Such an event requires some repair work to the landing gear, but contractor officials explained that it is not a safety concern. According to the program office, it is not a safety concern because the current workaround for this deficiency is pilot training to avoid braking on the side of the blown tire. Program test officials said that testing with deficiencies is not uncommon and they will continue to work to address them, but some may not be fully resolved for several years.

    https://www.gao.gov/assets/700/698748.pdf

    in reply to: Military Aviation News #2095784
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    Meh… Polish, Finish, Greek, Spanish, and Swiss orders will more than make up for it 🙂

    We’ll throw in donating the Turkish F-35s to Kurdistan just for the giggles :rolleyes:

    in reply to: 2019 F-35 News and Discussion #2095831
    SpudmanWP
    Participant

    The contract is a “Fixed-Price, Incentive” type so no, it won’t affect this contract unless there is some clause in it about cancelations.

Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 4,849 total)