dark light

Graham Adlam

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 811 through 825 (of 1,322 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Bomber command losses #1183451
    Graham Adlam
    Participant

    Some of the crew were taken prisoner so that seems to fit; from the Lost Bombers website:

    When lost, this aircraft had a total of 502 hours. Airborne 2213 30Mar44 from Skellingthorpe. While on the outbound leg was hit either by Flak or cannon-fire from a night-fighter. Within seconds of being hit, the Lancaster exploded over Waldbreitbach, a village in picturesque countryside, 12 km E of Sinzig.

    Those killed are buried in Rheinberg War Cemetery.

    F/S D.G.Gray POW
    Sgt J.Grant KIA
    F/S A.D.Campbell RAAF POW
    F/S G.Wallis RAAF POW
    Sgt H.A.Wright KIA
    Sgt F.B.Patey KIA
    Sgt D.Maughan KIA

    Thats great info just had this email back from Germany seems pretty sure of his facts so i think we have a match,

    “Time was exactly 0.33 in the night. I have other wrekage from a lot of places where aircraft came down. I know a lot of places with sometimes very curios storrys,it was also printed in a famous paper here, the “Luftwaffen Revue”…so you can see – it´s official & legal.
    I ofen speak with old people who try to remember whats happend in these nights an the following days….very interersting stuff.
    I know round about 4 places where Lancasters came down. From some places I´ve photos out of the archive….so you can sometimes see wich type of bomber it was or read it in other documents out of this time”

    in reply to: Bomber command losses #1183704
    Graham Adlam
    Participant

    Is it certain these are Lancaster bits?

    Take-off time was 22:13 hours from Skellingthrope (if it was R5546) and aircraft was shot-down on the long, slow (against headwind), outboard route, so it should be relatively simple to work out if the time is correct.

    Where does the crash-time come from; a local witness, or a Luftwaffe combat report?

    He is a local who has come across the crash site. He says the aircraft was cleered at the time it crashed. He is not an eye witness but knows an old man who saw it and said the crew were taken as POW, suggests a belly landing? possibly. Although if this was the case I would not expect instruments strewn around the crash site.
    He seems pretty specific about the time and aircraft type, I will email him and ask what makes him so certain and is it local time.

    in reply to: Bomber command losses #1183940
    Graham Adlam
    Participant

    I had a quick look for you last night (you are lucky I happened to have the 1944 BCL on my desk).

    I couldn’t find the place names that you mentioned relating to any Lancaster loss (but it is possible I could have missed them) and the losses are not listed by time-of-loss in the BCL books. Also, as has been said, there are sadly a lot of Lancasters to check for that night.

    One problem may be that the locations that you have given are tiny, little more than a few farm buildings or a hamlet from the look of them, and this is sixty-five years of building later.

    It is very probable that the crash location of the Lancaster in question is listed in BCL in a different way, such as ‘3km West of Waldbreitbach’ for example. The Google-Maps page is linked below:

    http://maps.google.com/maps?f=q&source=s_q&hl=en&q=Girgenrath+Bad+H%C3%B6nningen,+Neuwied,+Rhineland-Palatinate,+Germany&sll=51.169011,6.957092&sspn=0.795649,2.801514&ie=UTF8&cd=1&geocode=FZBVAwMdsndwAA&split=0&ll=50.551835,7.378821&spn=0.012598,0.043774&t=h&z=15

    Presumably you are trying to trace this aircraft from a crash location witness?

    Thanks All

    Yes I have been emailed by a chap from the area trying to trace which aircraft he has found, here are a couple of bits he has recovered I guess on the surface. The oxy gauge is obvious the other piece is AM 11/A which is something to do with the bomb gear.

    Graham Adlam
    Participant

    It’s a real shame that the dogs name is such a big issue, History really should be seen in context and recreated as accurately as possible, otherwise eventually we will loose the truth.

    This issue really is the tip of the iceberg.

    However if the name were used the press will be all over it and the achievement of those Brave aircrew will be lost in a sea of Bull**** about whose offending who.

    Personally it makes me smile to think anyone should or would get offended by a name and in reality I don’t think it would offend anyone.

    The ordinary people would not complain its our corrupt politicians and press that would seek to profit by the use of the name, they would be forced to have meetings, form committees, press releases and run pages of print while fighting each other to see who can get their noses deepest into the expenses trough.

    The real crime of PC Britain is the gradual dissolution of the right to Freedom of speech and the gradual erosion of the British way of life isn’t that one of the main reasons the War was fought, to preserve it.

    When a thing like a Dogs name becomes an issue in the recreation of such an iconic and monumental event in British history you know its to late the Enemy is within.

    in reply to: FW 190 at Duxford – 09Jul09 #1184830
    Graham Adlam
    Participant

    I believe the original plan was for the French contingent to arrive at Duxford at 13.00, but as is the way with best laid plans part of the contingent arrived at 17.20. Hopefully the rest will arrive tomorrow. On landing the FW 190 pilot was given a celebratory bottle of ‘Spitfire’ Beer!

    http://i5.photobucket.com/albums/y200/penpusher/01%20Duxford%202009/Duxford%2009Jul09/01.jpg

    http://i5.photobucket.com/albums/y200/penpusher/01%20Duxford%202009/Duxford%2009Jul09/02.jpg

    http://i5.photobucket.com/albums/y200/penpusher/01%20Duxford%202009/Duxford%2009Jul09/03.jpg

    http://i5.photobucket.com/albums/y200/penpusher/01%20Duxford%202009/Duxford%2009Jul09/04.jpg

    http://i5.photobucket.com/albums/y200/penpusher/01%20Duxford%202009/Duxford%2009Jul09/05.jpg

    Brian

    Nice pictures, functional but an ugly beast me thinks would look better with a MK IX up its tail pipe

    in reply to: Meteor Missfire #1187351
    Graham Adlam
    Participant

    Hi Graham, just what I was going to say!
    When you open the throttle the BMEP (cylinder pressure) goes up and if you have a weak spark it becomes harder to spark through the denser mixture, but to be honest I would doubt that is the case with both mags. The centrifugal cutouts could be faulty if they are spring-loaded.
    If you have not removed the mags then forget the timing base settings (and likewise with the valve timing) as it was running fine for Darren when he had it.
    As far as I know there is no ign. timing adjustment on the front of the mag. If yours have two sets of points, one is fixed and the other is moveable in order to ensure they are 150° apart. This is a feature on Simms mags on the Meteor only, Merlins have one set of points.

    As it is so different to the Merlin I don`t know much about the fuel system, fuel starvation, possibly along the lines of what Bruce was asking, could be an issue which would cause it to pop and bang as it goes weak.

    Flames up the inlet manifold are something which any engine without a flame trap can get.

    That e-mail address is not working at the moment, if you e-mail me via this forum I will get it , apologies for that!

    Pete

    Hello Pete

    Your back, tried running her with one mag off then the other acts as it should
    slight drop but still missfires like a pig when i try to throttle up. I havent adjusted the mags in any way but I took the cover off and both contacts are opening and closing. Like you said it was running fine with Darren so it cant be timing.
    So you think its the plugs and leads? I only have to open the throttle a fraction and it acts up.
    I dont think its fuel starvation the plugs were soaked when i took them out and its blowing big flames when it is missfiring, the carb has plenty of juice in it.
    I noticed when i took the mag covers off that one of the spikes that go into the HT lead had completely rusted away so there is at least one plug not getting a spark.
    Any ideas where i can get a new one from? or even new mags.
    I know they can be coverted to electronic ignition but dont have a clue how to go about it?.
    Thanks to all really appreciate the interest and helpfull comments.

    in reply to: Meteor Missfire #1188550
    Graham Adlam
    Participant

    Just had a brain wave, will run the engine with one mag on at a time this should identify problem both mags cannot have the same problem, if one is ok the missfire should vanish.:)

    in reply to: Meteor Missfire #1188559
    Graham Adlam
    Participant

    That’s a good point(s)…..sorry. 😮 Ahhh…points…that takes me back! 🙂

    Yes, check the points before you take all the plugs out! 😉 Mind you, two magnetos, at least one should be working OK. :confused:

    How are the carbs and mags set up on a Meteor; presumably each magneto fires 12 plugs, six in each bank, but what about the carbs, do they feed one bank each or do all 12 cylinders draw mixture through both?

    It’s tricky this duplication of everything; it makes fault finding hard…..are you sure both banks are affected?

    The Meteor is set up like the Merlin, both mags drive all twelve cylinders with two sets of plugs, I guess if one mag is faulty its going to cause problems. The carb has two intakes but they also feed all 12 Cylinders, going to take off the mag covers and see how much gap opens up on the points and see if both mags are doing the same thing, one thing I noticed when cleaning the mags the points looked quite thin is this normal? . Looks like there is an advance and retard ajuster on the mags but dont want to play with this i might make it worse. I had a small fire in the carb intakes that suggests backfire to me?

    I will also contact the tank experst as advised in the last couple of posts, thanks Gents

    in reply to: Meteor Missfire #1188593
    Graham Adlam
    Participant

    Cleaned all the plugs and contacts in the mags, starts well runs smoothly on tick over, with all cylinders now firing, the second even a 1/4 inch of throttle is applied it missfires backfires and vibrates violenty.

    Having read the advise here I am now pretty sure its some sort of timing problem.

    There is lots of fuel and plenty of spark.

    I think either the points are to close and shorting or its an ignition retarding problem. These engines are big tough and reliable I would be surprised if the ignition had a serious fault.

    Personally I think its the points certainly the simplest to fix first but i dont have any info on how to set them ie what gap and what position before TDC.

    Thanks for all the advise all just need a bit more to hopefully solve this problem, does anyone have a Meteor manual?

    in reply to: Meteor Missfire #1189447
    Graham Adlam
    Participant

    check your fuel filters- are they blocked? and all fuel connections for air leaks and also you say you are running on unleaded fuel are you quite sure it can take it? if not it will damage valve seats.

    All fuel lines and filters are Ok, unleaded may not be perfect and i may add some additive but when you consider we only run her for 5 minutes at most rarely she should last forever.

    in reply to: Meteor Missfire #1189549
    Graham Adlam
    Participant

    Here is the first plug to come out very sooty and has un burnt petrol on the insulator guess this ones not firing.
    Here is a picture of the fuel filter one on each side, certainlky seems to flow Ok the 8 gallons we put in only lasted a few short runs

    in reply to: Meteor Missfire #1189597
    Graham Adlam
    Participant

    Lots of good advise thankyou I think I’ll check and clean the plugs although its a bloody tedious job and the inner ones are a pig to get out, I will also have a look inside the mag covers although i have no idea what gap they should be set at, a good clean cant hurt.

    The throttle linkage operates both carbs as does the choke/buterflies both appear to work fine.

    It certainly looks from the flames out of the stubbs that its not firing on all cylinders (see video) and maybe a good clean of the plugs and points will sort it out, hope its not something more serious like valve trouble that would be a disaster.

    The last meteor I had I replaced all the leads and spark plugs for modern stuff wish I had fitted this one now. I actually saw this one running before i fitted it but the HT leads and plugs are originals and must be at least 40 years old??

    The fuel lines are connected through original Merlin/Spitfire fuel filters so they should be the correct diameter, all those are brand new shiny braided jobs.

    Both mags operate fine either one can be shut down and she keeps running.
    Have emailed Merlin Pete but he must be busy no reply from the Master yet.

    in reply to: Meteor Missfire #1189689
    Graham Adlam
    Participant

    The Meteor differs from the Merlin in that the carb is sat on top of the engine, so no its not fuel injected, I thought at first it was fuel starvation as one of the fuel pumps did not seem to have any pressure in it after numerous pumps on the priming lever but I dont think its that as engines tend to stall when the throttle is opened and there isnt enough fuel.
    It has no air filter the air is sucked straight into the carb from the inlets on top. I am also using super unleaded as apposed to full leaded fuel, however when i first ran it I did use leaded fuel and it still refused to rev and i have been told they will run happily on unleaded.
    You can see a video of it running at the bottom of this page
    http://spitfirespares.com/SPITFIRESPARES.COM/pages/Spitfire%20MkVIII%20Replica%20page%203.html

    there are allot of video but the best is the last one on this page at the bottom, the spluttering and vibration occur every time the throttle is opened, although even on tick over its running a little rough.
    It happened the first time I ran it but I put this down to the engine not being warm, certainly not the case in later runs.

    in reply to: Meteor Missfire #1189952
    Graham Adlam
    Participant

    Accelerator pump?

    Anon.

    Expand please 🙂

    in reply to: Battle of Britain theme tune copyright ?? #1189960
    Graham Adlam
    Participant

    PRS administer copyright on just about all music, that is why in post two I put up the link, we could go into great detail on music copyright but the answer was really in that post guys.

    Thks Chris if thats the case I’ll just pay them the fee happy days.

Viewing 15 posts - 811 through 825 (of 1,322 total)