Not quite Graham, need a Hurricane then your set will be complete :p However, once you have said Hurricane, then gimme a call, and Id love to help u look after it………. D’oh my secrets out, Cranberrys aint my only vice 😉
Bex
Bex
Got the Hurricane unfortunately all in bits, to many projects so little time!
http://www.spitfirespares.com/SpitfireSpares.com/Pages/Hurricane%20restoration.html
Well after a hectic few weeks the Museum opened to the public yesterday, and it seems the public are suitably impressed!. A few things still need doing, and another exhibit is still to arrive from Italy, which I can’t comment on just yet. Hard to capture how life like the mannequins are in the photos..they were done, along with the sets, by Weta workshops, the same people who did the Lord of the Rings props – some talented people I can tell you!
[ATTACH]148698[/ATTACH][ATTACH]148699[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH]148700[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH]148701[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH]148702[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH]148703[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH]148704[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH]148705[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH]148706[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH]148707[/ATTACH]
http://www.omaka.org.nz/
Awesome its a pitty your almost exactly on the opposite side of the world. I think this sort of display setting is great, really takes you back. Welldone
When you first hinted at a Mosquito, I thought it must be this one.
Its nice to see what has been done finally. However, for someone to have gone to so much trouble to build a Mosquito, and to make so many fundamental errors in shape, it is a little disappointing.
I am unsure how you will attach a wing, owing to the fact that the fuselage is built without provision for it – there should be a large ‘U’ shaped hole where the green painted area is.
I would be happy to come over and offer sone advice, but before I do, would extend an invitation for you to come over to the museum, and have a look at our aircraft. I am sure you can improve on what is there – and I can probably help with some bits and bobs.
Cheers for now
Bruce
Bruce
Thanks for the offer, will try to visit soon can you PM the address?
Whats wrong with the shape? are you goiung from the pictures or have you seen it in the flesh? It could be the picture’s not giving the true dimmensions. I cannot Dave belive built this without a plan, would have thought it almost impossible without them.
Fitting the wing is a long way off although its something Dave had given some thought too and passed the info on. There are a few instruments and controls I don’t like and am going to replace them with correctly dated. Still overal its a superb find for me, just need a Lanc to complete the set LOL I wish:D
Hey it’s the Kemble repro Mosquito/Canberra etc…. 😀
Did the guy give up then ? Bruce, what say yee….?
http://www.bc-heritage.org/bch/KMProject.asp
http://forum.keypublishing.co.uk/showthread.php?t=53503/
Edit: Graham, planning on installing 2x Meteors then ? Now that would be something to see !!
.
Well rumbled already!!:D Yes it’s the Kemble Mosquito; Dave decided to give her up after storage hassles. I obviously wanted to keep quiet about her ID until the sale went through; it’s been very entertaining seeing the rumour mill get going and the speculation of what she was. Sorry :diablo:
I really do want to complete the Job, meteors would probably be the limit of my pocket although allot more hassle to fit. The experience gained doing our replica Spit could make this a real possibility, but obviously the wings are a very big job. She needs a fair bit done to the Cockpit there are allot of non original parts and there is allot to add, hoping I will be getting visits from some of the Mossy experts “Bruce?” I really think getting all the various controls and equipment right and original is important.
Saying that I feel really privileged to own her, Dave did a superb job over the last eleven years and she is a real credit to his determination and skill.
There is an interesting item on page 12 of the current issue of our Forum’s sponsor, Flypast, stating that John Romain of the Aircraft Restoration Company at Duxford has totalled 500 hours on Spitfires.
Considering the short life of planes and pilots in the war, I wondered if anyone else might have exceeded that total?
On thinking further I considered names like Henshaw, Quill and Curtis. If Alex Henshaw actually flew 10% of all Spitfires produced as has been suggested, say for a test flight of 30 minutes, this would give him a total of about 1000 hours flying time. Anyone like to suggest any other contenders?
David Glaser (E D Glaser) was operational from the Battle of Britain 65 Sdr until the end of the war. During this time he clocked up 3000 operational Hrs all on Spits. Pretty hard to top I would say. He was a personal friend of mine and I saw the log books so i know it for a fact.
You can see how he aged from the freshed faced 19 year old in 1940 to the Battle hardened Squadron Ldr in the Northern Territories in 1945. A Brave man!
Here is a link to his story.
http://www.spitfirespares.com/SpitfireSpares.com/Pages/reference2l.html
[QUOTE=tankbarrell;1152882]
I should be using a later rev counter up to 5K but I am pretty sure the Meteor won’t rev much more than 3400 so am using an earlier version. QUOTE]
The Meteor is governed to 2550 rpm
Thankyou for that, I have been told the rev counter I am using is for the RR Kestral.
Hi Graham
I hadn’t seen a rounds counter before. However, I have seen a GA drawing of the Hornet instrument panels with a Rounds counter in place, that is of a linear gauge type, similar in look to the linear fuel gauges shown in the following photo.
Have you ever seen a linear rounds counter, as I have never seen a photo of one in a Hornet (not even the prototypes). It may have been in the initial paper design, but subsequently dropped for production?
Hello David
They must be rare I have never seen one, had a few round ones but never rectangular. I will keep my eyes open.
More progress
The tail wheel and rudder are now fitted and connected to the rudder pedals. Might not look like much but it really was a mission, this replica was never designed for anything to function and we have done lots of fabrication to make the tail work. We will be trying to make the tail wheel a bit prettier, but first and foremost we have gone for strength. We have designed it so everything comes apart quickly for transportation. ie rudder and elevators.
The rudder pedals were fabricated as the alloy repros kept snapping!! looked like a honeycombed inside and were useless. You can see the cables connected to the rudder bars and the manual rev counter drive fitted to the engine. It needs a bit of beefing up on the mounting bracket. I should be using a later rev counter up to 5K but I am pretty sure the Meteor won’t rev much more than 3400 so am using an earlier version. Some of the panels have been prepped for paint and the top cowling fitted. We are wiring up the instrument panel and have got the fuel gauge working from the original sender, thanks to the wiring diagrams supplied by forum members. Still hoping to get it ready for B of B day, still allot to do!;)
I belive cannon ammo counter gauges were fitted in some Spitfire’s although I have never seen a Spitfire cockpit with one fitted. Does anyone know if and where is was fitted, a picture would be even better. We are fitting out the MKVIII cockpit i would like to fit one.:)
By the way I realsie this picture is for 303 ammo
It does help if you read all the posts and then think about what you have read for a few minutes.
It in turn does help if you had read my post properly then. The fact that the paper report might have got it wrong is not an issue with me as you will notice from my first and second post I said that I wouldn’t comment on the farmer but only the report.
first post :-I wonder if this is being reported correctly and wont comment on the farmer only the reported statements.
Second post:-I wont comment on the farmer because as you put it the papers quite often fail to get it right.I don’t think I could have been any clearer on that point.
At the end of the day I can’t afford to chuck money around but instead of bleating on about what a travisty this is why don’t we all put our hands in our pockets and try and make something positve happen.The point I am trying to make is that with any kind of dig the terms of the agreement in this country is that you return the land to what it was like before you did the dig which is standard and other than a bottle or something similar the farmer or land owner generally gets nothing but the thanks of the team and his own personal satisfaction of having done something nice for the families. No money has ever changed hands with our team and landowners apart from plant hire if we have used the farmer’s plant.
If the report is true WHY should this guy get any money from the team doing the dig unless his land is made unworkable due to toxic waste or the like.
And as for bleating on if we all had your attitude we would have to pay for every single thing that we do in life.
I thought we did anyway one way or another LOL
Simply put if the families comments are being reported right then they don’t want to pay for the dig as they don’t think its right either. Perhaps they wouldn’t like money put up for the dig as it would be against their principles.Firstly, is there any kind of legal imperative regarding the recovery of the remains of Service Personnel who were killed on active service? I have personally never heard of money exchanging hands in order for bodies to be recovered, has anyone else?
Hi Kev. On your first point I have no idea how it works in foreign countries but I think that in this country if you can prove that the remains are still with the aircraft then the family can insist they be recovered. I might be totally wrong on that but I am pretty sure I had seen it somewhere.
And as for money changing hands for body recovery then I definitely haven’t heard of this before.
Peter mentions that the crew did not ‘choose’ to die in a field, by the same token I suspect that the land owner’s family didn’t ‘choose’ to have the aircraft crash there either.
Swings both ways on this I am afraid but I don’t know what the MOD policy is if the farmer decides he is totally fed up with the whole thing and demands the RAF come and remove their aircraft. I think he may be entitled to do that by law but again don’t quote me.
I’m sure that there must be ways in which agencies of the Governments involved could work together to resolve the problem swiftly, satisfactorily and as painlessly to the families and the land owner as possible.
On this point Kev one would like to think that this would be the case but I am sure that its not unless the government got one huge kick up the backside about this. We all know politics just aint like that.
OK point taken, not trying to offend anyone, just thought it would be a nice gesture for this forum to offer the family some finacial assistance surely I cannot be shot down for that :confused: Clearly none of us know the full facts and as i have opened my big mouth on the subject I’ll try and contact the Telagraph tomorrow and see if it’s possible to contact the family.
To my mind the government should have a recovery policy in regard to unrecoverd aircrew and a budget. I do not believe they will lift a finger without a very hard push. With an election comming imagine a headline.”Aviation group funds recovery and buriel of war Hero’s” with a line about the British governments total lack of interest in the subject. They were pressured into letting that VC winner in recently. Sounds like a story one of the nationals might get hold of and maybe get a result for all the other aircrew still burried with their aircraft in Europe? Just a thought.
“I would be happy to pledge £500”
You are missing the entire point. Why should anyone have to pay to dig over a piece of land that probably needs dug over anyway. Let alone have to pay to get a family member back.
If I had the money I would pay the £5000 today but that would not be the point of the thing.
I wont comment on the farmer because as you put it the papers quite often fail to get it right.
It does help if you read all the posts and then think about what you have read for a few minutes. Quite simply I take Tangmere’s point that the story in the paper might not be entirely accurate and that the farmer may not be seeking to profit from recovery of bodies but rather be seeking to repair the damage caused. The ammount he seems to be seeking is excessive but that may be an exageration on part of the paper? At the end of the day I can’t afford to chuck money around but instead of bleating on about what a travisty this is why don’t we all put our hands in our pockets and try and make something positve happen.:confused:
If the story is as reported then his actions certainly are reprehensible. However, being devil’s advocate here, it could well be that the farmer just wants some compensation for the inconvenience, potential damage etc. It could also involve land drainage or loss of crops. As a student I worked on an asparagus farm in the Darmstadt area and I know that the agricultural value of the land and crop could be high. We simply dont know all the facts of this case. In the end, the “German farmer demands money to recover RAF crew” angle is an emotive storyline and the press know that. Maybe there is another side of the coin? It has not been unknown for a journalist/newspaper not to allow the facts get in the way of a good story – or to get it just plain wrong. Look at the Guardian a week or so ago who reported, incorrectly, that Flt Sgt Williams and his Hurricane had been recovered when they hadn’t! Dont get me wrong, I am not supporting this farmer IF he is profiteering from the families or holding them to ransom. On the other hand, if he wants a reasonable disturbance fee then this should be met by respective governements. To me, £5,000 or £7,500 for a government to have to pay to recover men who died in its service seems inconsequential. Lets not demonise the German farmer without knowing, fully, the story on this one.
Good point, it would be an exception for the press to actually get it right, its probably a fabrication like most of the cr**p they print. Whats a few grand to our Government surely our national hero’s deserve a few grand for a decent burial? Perhaps someone should point out to Brown that they are now a minority group as that seems to be the only groups they will do anything for anyone in the UK.
I would be happy to pledge £500 if someone can put me in touch with the family, PM me. Perhaps if we all made a contribution the matter could be resolved?
Just spotted this:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2007/08/12/nbomber112.xml
£5000 to fill in a hole, Bender by name and bender by nature:mad:
I have, on a number of occasions let the seller know just what he is selling!
Anyway, I wasnt having a go – I have no issue whatever with what you do, or what you sell.
Bruce
Sorry Bruce i wasnt having a pop at you personally just making a point i think we have all wasted enough time discussing it lets get back to our projects.;)
Hi Graham. Hows it coming along . Do you have an update for us.
Cant wait:)
Rudder has been fitted amd steering tail wheel all rigged, along with the front top cowling , the side panels and tail plane have been rubbed down and prepared for paint. Just a few more things to sort and then a full rub down ready for paint. Still on track to display late this season.