dark light

Graham Adlam

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,171 through 1,185 (of 1,322 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Replica MkVIII Spitfire and a Meteor engine #1278291
    Graham Adlam
    Participant

    To save yourself a lot of grief, I would suggest to cut the flange off, very accurately, outboard of the weld swing it through 180 and re-weld and dress, locating the two parts in a simple fixture. I think you will find that the stubs will then clear the harness and have the correct relationship to the cowlings. Of course left will then service right and vice versa.

    Try just the one first. πŸ™‚

    Mark

    Gave up on the manifold idea after allot of work it looked terrible. Cut off all the flanges and re-attached them. They fit perfectly now and are clear of the cowling. A bit of work fireproofing the Cowling and it ought to be OK:cool: .I Live and learn, had to try it. They are of coarse 6″ two far back but i think it looks OK.

    in reply to: an anyone help Id this stuff? #1282133
    Graham Adlam
    Participant

    Peter

    The switch is a rotary landing light switch the Lancaster main panel has two of them. If it’s got an aiministry crown it was manufactured before the end of 1943.

    in reply to: AEROJUMBLES – SHOREHAM & BROOKLANDS #1285130
    Graham Adlam
    Participant

    The urge to buy is strong with this one Obiwan:) πŸ™‚ πŸ™‚ πŸ™‚ πŸ™‚

    Can’t wait, Saving my pennies. A new beginning and maybe some new stall holders as well Andy?

    in reply to: Spitfire 400MPH or 480MPH ASI #1285250
    Graham Adlam
    Participant

    No Graham,

    Coastal Command used them too, the better to co-ordinate with the Royal Navy, etc.

    Thankyou that’s useful info:)

    in reply to: Replica MkVIII Spitfire and a Meteor engine #1285254
    Graham Adlam
    Participant

    Spent last night refining drawings for a Manifold. Had a long discussion with the fabricator today and he advised as Mark did to cut off and reweld the flanges. The problems with this are the stubs still need to go forward 6′ to be inline with the cowling, second they also need to stick out about another inch or so, thirdly this doesn’t’ address the hot stubs burning fibreglass the cowling. So I have gone for the manifold, is going to look a little strange with the last stub actually being inline with exhaust port five if you get what I mean. The top of the manifold will carry a square water channel with tubes attached to each end for hose connection from the head outlets and exit back into the cooling system. The manifold will correct the angle of the stubs missing the ignition harness, protect the cowling and the stubs will all line up with the cowling so its looks right externally.
    It’s just a shame we couldn’t get the engine in the right position but the Hub hydraulics are two deep to allow it. Will post pics when it’s done! Going to work on the oil and water system’s until the manifolds are ready. The hydraulics are going to work out really well. They will be linked to the prop pitch control on the throttle and I will be able to increase prop revs very slowly from total stop with the engine revs constant. πŸ™‚

    in reply to: Spitfire 400MPH or 480MPH ASI #1285260
    Graham Adlam
    Participant

    The Warwick was fitted 420 Knots gauge (if watching carefully the pilot’s notes), I strongly believe that there’s is no evidence of 480 m.p.h. A.S.I. on this plane. All the datas & limitations in the pilot’s notes are in knots to, needless to say that is duty asked for knots & wasn’t compatible with M.P.H.

    Cheers,

    Olivier

    As far as I know knot gauges were only fitted to FAA aircraft during the war. Post war all aircraft were converted to Knots ASI’s.

    in reply to: Replica MkVIII Spitfire and a Meteor engine #1286754
    Graham Adlam
    Participant

    heres a pict of my old MKXX the Meteor faces the wrong way.:mad:

    in reply to: Replica MkVIII Spitfire and a Meteor engine #1286771
    Graham Adlam
    Participant

    Thats not altogether right Stuart.
    These stubs are not originals. They would have a kink where the elbow is which makes the outlet point slightly up above the horizontal.
    These appear to be symmetrical in that axis, so the fact that they point downwards would be caused by the vee angle. Assuming the stud positions allowed you to put them on the other side (which they dont) I think these ones would look just the same either way, whereas the original type (Mk XVI Spitfire) were pressed out handed.

    Personally I don`t think they look too bad, the proof is in what they look like with the cowling panels on.

    Maybe the outlets look a bit big? the o/d of these at the outlet should be 2.800″
    There is another type similar to these (you have one 4 sale on your site Graham) which was fitted to the P51 and Balliol / Athena, with a much smaller outlet which has the effect of making the engine considerably louder!

    Pete

    Louder!! good!! theres always a silver lining. P51 you say? I that they were right for the MKVIII still learning.:)

    in reply to: Replica MkVIII Spitfire and a Meteor engine #1286775
    Graham Adlam
    Participant

    back to front

    I have just figured it out, they are copied exactly, its just that the bloody engine’s back to front because its a Meteor AHHHHHHHHHH didnt think of that. If you put them on facing the other way they point up, no wonder they are hitting the ignition sytem!!!!:mad:
    Drives me nuts sometimes. Oh well stuck with them now. When the manifold is made will have to angle it up so the stubs can be picked up a bit.:D

    in reply to: Replica MkVIII Spitfire and a Meteor engine #1287009
    Graham Adlam
    Participant

    Yes probably not such an easy job, better get it made up with some real skill? Any volunteers out there want to earn a bit of extra cash maybe? I think it’s the way to go, I know I am going to pick up some extra heat but think of the hassle of new cowlings and the cost. Have test fitted the stubs, god they look sexy:o . They are way to close to the ignition harness, in fact touching, they have to come out. I don’t understand this because they are exact copies of the original I have??? πŸ™‚

    in reply to: Replica MkVIII Spitfire and a Meteor engine #1287135
    Graham Adlam
    Participant

    You could try that, although fixing alloy to fibre glass is hard to do really neatly. In the original set up theres a slightly complicated steel assy that sits under the stubs and is bolted to the engine, that then fixes to the top and side cowlings; obviously if you go down that route, you are going to get heat transference, if you don’t you have to design something else to hang the cowlings on that doesnt touch the engine.

    R.e the stubs you could make up a “manifold” ,i.e something like a long box section, onto which all of the exhaust ports are bolted, you could then put your custom made stubs on it but space them all forward so that they exit the cowlings in the right place.

    Its amazing how many challenges you come across building something like this. I like the manifold idea THANKS if i create a water space in the manifold, like a double skin I could circulate water around the manifold, take a feed off the outlets on the head then back into the return system. This would make the stubbs stick farther out in turn keeping the exhaust gas further away from the cowlings.This ought to keep everything cool enough to retain the existing cowlings. I am going to have to make mounts for the cowlings, they were originally one piece and held themselves together. I am going off the big tank idea in the tail, might try two or three car rads linked up with some big electric fans. There is plenty of room in the rear as long as we can get the heat out of the fusilarg, maybe an extractor mounted behind the rads would be better? if i can raise the air pressure in there the hot air ought to be forced out through the gaps in the tail and the tail leg. πŸ™‚

    How about this for a quick sketch, yes i know its all out of scale wrong number of stubbs ect, its a fag packet design, do you think it would work?

    in reply to: Replica MkVIII Spitfire and a Meteor engine #1287161
    Graham Adlam
    Participant

    With you having had 4 ,and me only 1, its hard to say “you were lucky”, probably I was unlucky, but did you get any overheating problems? as they all had the rad almost on the road.

    The other thing with the Scimitar was that when you opened up the bonnet ,you thought that you’d been robbed, and someone had made off with your engine ,and left a bald tyre (in it’s place) as a sort of bad joke!

    Back on topic, Graham, if you’ve moved the engine back 6″ approx ,what are you going to do about the last exhaust stub (each side) ; you are right to be concerned about the exhaust heat, looking at the gestation of the Mosquito, I believe Halford said ” the next A/C that we build should be designed around the exhaust system”, he was probably thinking if the Vampire!!

    We were going to cut an extra slot for the back stub and fill the hole left at the front, however I am not very hopeful about using these panels, I am almost certain I am going to cahnge the top cowling and sides for alloy. I don’t want all that hard work and expence going up in flames. I know just how hot those stubs can get, not to mention the hot gasses hitting the panel sides. The problem is that getting the panels and top cowling made is going to cost an arm and a leg, perhaps i can replace say a 1Ft all the way around the stubs with alloy, i could probably do that myself. I don’t think the engines going to get hot enough to hurt the fibre glass two much, its the stubs i am worried about. What do you think?

    in reply to: Replica MkVIII Spitfire and a Meteor engine #1287667
    Graham Adlam
    Participant

    Ha Ha! πŸ˜€

    didn’t they call that the “Plastic pig” put a Merlin in in I say:D

    in reply to: Spitfire 400MPH or 480MPH ASI #1288081
    Graham Adlam
    Participant

    I’d put money on it being from a Whirlwind. The Whirlwind Pilots Notes has examples of an early and a late production panel. Both panels have this gauge, and the date fits.

    Maybe not as exotic as a Tornado or the Speed Spit, but rare nevertheless.

    Best wishes
    Steve P

    Steve

    Have you got any pics of the ASI in a Whirlwind?:)

    in reply to: Good Old Time Prices! #1288090
    Graham Adlam
    Participant

    prices are relative,the prices quoted in the add in the time they were advertised represent allot higher value than the same money now, don’t forget inflation. Prices are market driven pure and simple, and of coarse if a part is rare its going to make more money. There may be fluctuations as with the turn and slips, its true they got very hard to find for a while, but there is one at least every week now. Generally prices will continue to rise because there is not a renewable source for WWII parts. The best way to build a large collection is to start dealing, its allot of hard work but gives some extra spending power.:D

Viewing 15 posts - 1,171 through 1,185 (of 1,322 total)