dark light

kev 99

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 76 through 90 (of 1,460 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: F-35B or F-35C for the Royal Navy #2029736
    kev 99
    Participant

    So perhaps I’m behind the times but I noticed some quotes regarding F-35b rolling landings adding up to 4000lbs to bring back weight. This would allow 2 storm shadow and 2 AMRAAM to be brought back. Sounds to me like the B version will do the job.

    I’m pretty sure that Stormshadow weighs something like 2700lb.

    in reply to: Naval deployment to Black Sea? #2030267
    kev 99
    Participant

    It suggest Aegis target tracking works well only when there is a number of these ships which can coordinate with each other somehow. This is strange: before the Burke class, carrier escort depended on 1 or 2 Ticonderoga’s (these being the only AEGIS ships at the time) and it suggests a lone AEGIS ship is ineffective (which is silly)

    However you turn it, the bolded parts are inconsistent: you either jam the radar (in which case the algorithm is already loaded) or you prevent the algorithm from loading (in which case there is nothing to jam).

    More importantly it gives information which could only have come from someone on board the ship, the bit about the 27 crew members being traumatised is clearly very silly.

    I’d say this report is as accurate as the one from a couple of weeks ago that stated Russia had downed an RQ-180 over it’s Northern Fleet base.

    in reply to: UK Poseidon and Triton to replace Nimrod? #2225769
    kev 99
    Participant

    Yeah I’m pretty sure Telemos has been rather quietly binned hasn’t it?

    in reply to: UK Poseidon and Triton to replace Nimrod? #2225896
    kev 99
    Participant

    Could a Triton take off from QE carrier? (no pun intended, i really do not know the program, or so little…)

    Not a hope.

    in reply to: Iran building mock-up Aircraft carrier #2031249
    kev 99
    Participant

    Probably to be used as target practice in an exercise and filmed as a propaganda.

    in reply to: Hypothetical Nimrod MRA4 and MH370 #2231626
    kev 99
    Participant

    I guess the other question i wondered about was if we had them would we have actually offered/sent them to a situation happening so far away?

    MH

    Since HMS Echo is being sent to survey the area, then I would imagine the answer to this question is yes we would of sent them if they were in service.

    in reply to: Navies news from around the world -V #2032342
    kev 99
    Participant

    Also that article states that there are 5 GP Type 26 and 8 ASW ones that are to be delivered as the first part of the Future Surface Combatant programme with the Type 27 making up the second stage. How out of date it that?

    Type 26 frigates are actually the 1st of 2 classes of ships to be built under the Royal Navy’s Future Surface Combatant program, also known as Global Combat Ships.

    The first ships of the Type 26 class are due to enter service in the early 2020s, and Britain envisions at least 12-13 of them. The current Type 26 plan involves 5 basic frigates, and another 8 ships with additional anti-submarine warfare equipment.

    By the 2030s, around half of front line Royal Navy personnel are expected to operate on a either a Type 26 frigate, or the 2nd “Type 27″ FSC variant.

    in reply to: Navies news from around the world -V #2032359
    kev 99
    Participant

    Strange: the article about the future British frigates makes the impression that still Type 22 frigates are in service!?

    I read this a couple of days ago and couldn’t believe how much out of date information it contained, plus I think this is the only place I’ve ever heard of a Type 27 Frigate.

    in reply to: INS Vikramaditya: Steaming towards Induction #2032439
    kev 99
    Participant

    This is a splendid opportunity for a joint venture with UK, both need an Osprey AEW badly,
    Brazil should be interested too, and USMC would be self reliant if they tag along

    UK has no interest in an Osprey AEW, it’s going to be Merlin HM2 with whatever solution is selected as part of the Crowsnest program.

    in reply to: QEC Construction #2032508
    kev 99
    Participant

    In all likelihood there won’t be a standard peace time deployment number, it has been suggested that a carrier won’t be deployed with fewer than 12 F35s but then I’m not totally convinced about that number, I suspect 9 will be a more realistic minimum deployment number.

    in reply to: Africa's first aircraft carrier #2032683
    kev 99
    Participant

    Snowballs in hell.

    in reply to: GENERAL UAV/UCAV NEWS AND DISCUSSION THREAD II #2262449
    kev 99
    Participant

    Well this makes it of interest to the US potentially doesn’t it? Can that happen?

    Can’t see any chance of that happening, the US will buy something from the US and I don’t really see France as being interested in anything that wasn’t at least 50% designed and built in France, accept for very small scale puchases like Hawkeye’s.

    in reply to: GENERAL UAV/UCAV NEWS AND DISCUSSION THREAD II #2262609
    kev 99
    Participant

    Do we think the French are going to want FCAS to fly off their carriers (if it is a true Rafale replacement, this is a must is it not?)

    Absolutely yes, for them they will want CATOBAR capable aircraft.

    in reply to: Navies news from around the world -V #2032788
    kev 99
    Participant

    Russia Begins Nuclear-Powered Missile Cruiser Overhaul

    I love this bit:

    The refit will build on the shipyard’s success of overhauling the Kiev-class aircraft carrier Baku, re-commissioned for India as the Vikramaditya in November.

    in reply to: Indian Air Force Thread 20 #2264813
    kev 99
    Participant

    http://www.sps-aviation.com/exclusive/?id=269&q=IAF-to-sign-missile-deal-with-MBDA-shortly

    384 ASRAAMs would be purchased for Jaguars to replace Magic R550. Apparently integrating Python-V would have involved modifications to Jaguar.

    Nice little export order 😎

Viewing 15 posts - 76 through 90 (of 1,460 total)