dark light

TEEJ

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 976 through 990 (of 2,134 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Typhoon In The Falklands, Argentine Enraged? #2380675
    TEEJ
    Participant

    Falklands’ thick fog forces two RAF Typhoons and tanker to land in Punta Arenas’

    ‘Two Royal Air Force Euro Typhoon fighters and their Vickers VC10 refuelling tanker had to land Wednesday afternoon in Punta Arenas, extreme south of Chile, because of adverse weather conditions in the Falkland Islands Mount Pleasant Airport.’ (The aircraft transited via Argentine airspace)

    http://en.mercopress.com/2010/06/04/falklands-thick-fog-forces-two-raf-typhoons-and-tanker-to-land-in-punta-arenas

    TJ

    in reply to: Military Aviation News from around the world – V #2380819
    TEEJ
    Participant

    ‘Falklands’ thick fog forces two RAF Typhoons and tanker to land in Punta Arenas’

    ‘Two Royal Air Force Euro Typhoon fighters and their Vickers VC10 refuelling tanker had to land Wednesday afternoon in Punta Arenas, extreme south of Chile, because of adverse weather conditions in the Falkland Islands Mount Pleasant Airport.’ (The aircraft transited via Argentine airspace)

    http://en.mercopress.com/2010/06/04/falklands-thick-fog-forces-two-raf-typhoons-and-tanker-to-land-in-punta-arenas

    TJ

    in reply to: Harrier incident Kandahar. #2381003
    TEEJ
    Participant

    From a layman’s point of view what got me was how little time the pilot had under the fully inflated chute before hitting the ground, it’s only about 3 seconds.
    I’d have thought that a “zero-zero” seat would have taken the pilot higher, so that in a worst case scenario there would be room to steer away from the burning aircraft.

    The RAF Harrier pilot during the following ejection was unfortunate to land back on top of the aircraft. He broke his ankle.

    Lowestoft Seafront Air Festival, UK – 2002

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1USNC3Ozw18

    Aircraft Accident Summary

    http://www.mod.uk/NR/rdonlyres/610DA872-1AC5-4CAF-B7CB-B4FFC76BD148/0/maas02_01_harrier_gr7_zd464_02aug02.pdf

    TJ

    in reply to: Harrier incident Kandahar. #2381298
    TEEJ
    Participant

    There was a series of images taken at the time. The only one I can find is the following.

    http://img30.imageshack.us/img30/7407/3447786819z.jpg

    TJ

    in reply to: Harrier incident Kandahar. #2381299
    TEEJ
    Participant

    whos harrier was it?

    UK. Part of Joint Force Harrier.

    According to the Harrier List ZG478/68 was on the strength of the Naval Strike Wing. No markings. Info correct as of 5th May 2009. It was also claimed to have been an RAF 1 Squadron aircraft by news sources at the time.

    TJ

    in reply to: Bruntingthorpe Latest #1129350
    TEEJ
    Participant

    not that it matters one jot what colour 715 is painted, but the picture in the link of XL164 in 85……pink?

    http://www.airliners.net/photo/UK—Air/Handley-Page-Victor/1259853/L/&sid=d29b2c9c71b78b69a35cd0c0ee37d0c9

    It is still hemp and not Desert Pink. None of the Victors served in Desert Pink during Operation Granby.

    The full XL164 photo search showing image of XL164 taken a few days earlier.

    http://www.airliners.net/search/photo.search?regsearch=XL164&distinct_entry=true

    Again I’ll stress that I’m not simply being pedantic, but the original statement still has

    “After quite a bit of research we discovered that all of these aircraft were painted in ‘Desert Pink’…so the general consensus amongst our volunteers was that ‘Teasin Tina’ should return to her ‘war colours’”

    The fact still stands that none of the Victors were re-painted in Desert Pink for Operation Granby. They went off to war in hemp and returned in hemp.

    Additional photographic evidence of Victors returning to the UK in 1991, including XM715 and XL164.

    http://forums.airshows.co.uk/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=20710

    Mad Dan wrote

    “…Anyway, here is what I have – all were taken in 1991, with XL164, XL231 and XM715 being shot at Marham on the day that several of the Victors came home..”

    Additional link from RAF website.

    http://www.raf.mod.uk/gulf/victors.html

    ‘Victor Colours

    The eight aircraft of No 55 Squadron deployed to Bahrain during December 1990 and January 1991 to provide AAR for RAF and other coalition aircraft. They remained in their overall Hemp scheme, but had a variety of nose art, largely featuring a variety of ladies with the 55 Squadron emblem, a spear, added in theatre by the Squadron artist.’

    This is an Historic Forum. As long as everybody keeps a level head, with no personal attacks, then there is no need to stifle or curtail debate on the subject.

    TJ

    in reply to: RAF using Alpha Jets? #2381799
    TEEJ
    Participant

    Owned by QinetiQ and operated out of Boscombe Down. QinetiQ bought a number of ex-Luftwaffe examples.

    http://www.targeta.co.uk/qinetiq.htm

    More details here

    http://www.pprune.org/military-aircrew/168277-raf-alpha-jet.html

    TJ

    in reply to: Bruntingthorpe Latest #1130345
    TEEJ
    Participant

    Obviously it is a contentious issue. Hats off to all who keep these aircraft alive. The issue is that the new colour is being attributed to ‘war colours’. XM715 nor any other Victor participated in Operation Granby in anything other than hemp.

    “After quite a bit of research we discovered that all of these aircraft were painted in ‘Desert Pink”.

    Posters have brought up the issue of other simply being pedantic, but the above statement is simply incorrect. That research requires to be highlighted if history is to be re-written. Not even the RAF website on Op Granby colours states anything other than hemp. The photographic evidence of Op Granby shows all Victors operating in hemp.

    XM715 in hemp going home from the Middle East – copyright John Cotterill

    Direct link

    http://www.aeroflight.co.uk/pics/gulfwar/victors/Victor%20K2%20XM715%20going%20home.jpg

    From

    http://www.aeroflight.co.uk/pics/gulfwar/gwraf.htm

    http://www.raf.mod.uk/gulf/colours.html

    ‘The Nimrods, Victors and VC10s remained in their overall “Hemp” schemes, but several of the Tristar tankers were given a coat of “Desert Sand” on thier fuselages.’

    Direct links to Op Granby images showing Victors in hemp.

    http://www.raf.mod.uk/gulf/gallery/3types800.bmp

    http://www.raf.mod.uk/gulf/gallery/dbvicbuccs800.jpg

    The following is a link to the history of one of the other Victors during Operation Granby XH672 from the RAF Museum.

    Jan 91 ‘Involved in Desert Storm operations against Iraq. Operated from Muharraq in standard hemp and light aircraft grey colour scheme’

    http://www.rafmuseum.org.uk/cosford/collections/aircraft/aircraft_histories/1995-1001-A%20Victor%20K2%20XH672.pdf

    Additional points have been added to the UKAR thread.

    http://forums.airshows.co.uk/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=23255

    TJ

    in reply to: BBMF on YouTube #1134775
    TEEJ
    Participant

    Well done, Yvonne. Great work!

    TJ

    in reply to: Camo Truders #2385275
    TEEJ
    Participant

    The first image of 159899

    http://cgi.ebay.com/USN-A-6-Intruder-VA-165-USS-Constellation-8×10-Photo-/270573671988

    ‘Photo Description: An overhead right side view 8×10 photo of a United States Navy (USN) A-6E Intruder aircraft (BuNo – 159899) assigned to Attack Squadron 165 “Boomers” (VA-165) aboard the aircraft carrier USS Constellation (CV-64) on 15 February 1990. Note the non-standard camouflage paint. In the background is a Lockheed S-3A Viking (BuNo 160578) from anti-submarine squadron VS-33 Screwbirds. Both squadrons were assigned to Carrier Air Wing 9 (CVW-9) for a voyage aboard Constellation from San Diego, California, to Norfolk, Virginia, around Cape Hoorn from February to April 1990.

    Photo Credit: DoD/PH3 Dewitt
    Photo Date: 15 February 1990
    Photo Location: USS Constellation (CVN-64)
    Photo ID: 810-A60013′

    TJ

    TEEJ
    Participant

    Superb, Mike. Thanks for posting. Quite a ride!

    TJ

    in reply to: Camo Truders #2385412
    TEEJ
    Participant

    http://www.airwarriors.com/forum/showthread.php?p=541529

    ‘Here’s what was written on VA-165’s camo experiment in the Summer 1990 edition of The Hook magazine (used here by permission of The Hook magazine)

    BOOMERS IN CAMOUFLAGE
    In a ComNavAirPac approved project, the Boomers of VA-165 painted some of their livery in temporary browns and greens and flew them at Red Flag and during their around-the-Horn transit in Constellation. The paint used is waterbased, can be quickly applied over existing paint and (most important) can be quickly removed using normal aircraft wash procedures.
    The project was developed by LT Mike Overson and LCDR Graham Gordon of VA-165’s maintenance department with the intent of using the aircraft color scheme to tactical advantage during Exercise Red Flag 89-5 at Nellis AFB. LT Overson had previously worked for Boeing Aerospace co. and discovered the alkaline-based emulsion used to protect parts during manufacturing there. After gaining permission for the test in early August 1989, the Boomer corrosion control work center, under the supervision of AMS1 Richmond Voss, applied the two-tone brown paint overnight to two A-6E aircraft. Details such as simulated canopies painted on the undersides of the aircraft were added. Tactical use of the scheme brought positive results during numerous Red flag missions. Once back at Whidbey, the paint was removed.
    Phase II of the test took place at sea in Connie in winter 1990. The coating was tested for resistance to sea spray and catapult steam as well for resistance to visual acquisition over different terrain. Phase III is scheduled for fall 1990 and includes mixing of separately stored pigments and adding them to a neutral base to crease the desired color.

    *****

    It’s not known how Phase III turned out. In the article, there’s one color inflight shot and one b/w flight deck shot of the camo birds.’

    TJ

    in reply to: Typhoon In The Falklands, Argentine Enraged? #2385420
    TEEJ
    Participant

    fixed it!

    🙂 By that time the Falkland Islands Defence Force will be self funded by oil funds and able to afford a squadron of their own. Argentina and the Falkland Islands know that they have to be prepared for a Bulgarian pincer move!

    TJ

    in reply to: Why British Reluctance For Sidewinder #1135803
    TEEJ
    Participant

    On the face of it the AIM-P Sidewinder seemed a capable missile but the RAF and FAA didn’t use it until much later than other countries.

    The AIM-9B was used in the 1960s by the FAA.

    http://www.abpic.co.uk/photo/1055799/

    AIM-9Bs on Scimitars

    http://www.thunder-and-lightnings.co.uk/scimitar/pictures.php

    The stockpiles of AIM-9Bs were passed onto the FAA Buccaneers.

    http://www.blackburn-buccaneer.co.uk/Pages1_files/Self-Defence_Index.html

    TJ

    in reply to: Why British Reluctance For Sidewinder #1135810
    TEEJ
    Participant

    Nice thought, but capability must have been a strong factor when it came to defence even then, look at the American kit we were using, AI radar, tactical nuclear weapons etc.

    The Harrier GR.3 I find interesting as I have seen it somewhere that it was Sidewinder capable just prior to the Falklands, but it was that conflict that made it AIM-9L capable, does anyone know precise details on this?

    The Harrier GR.3s were modified to carry AIM-9Gs while the Sea Harriers received the AIM-9L stocks.

    http://harrier.hyperlinx.cz/FAQ-falklandwar.htm

    http://www.raf.mod.uk/falklands/1sqn_1.html

    TJ

Viewing 15 posts - 976 through 990 (of 2,134 total)