dark light

Tartan Pics

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 916 through 930 (of 1,748 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Glasgow to Palma De Mallorca Sept. 07 #441681
    Tartan Pics
    Participant

    Great set Jamie.
    Was that driver steemin’ too:D 😀 he seems to have a leaky nose:eek:
    So we getting some shots from Palma then??

    in reply to: Mingin' Morn at MAN #441686
    Tartan Pics
    Participant

    Absolutely DJ, the AVP is fantastic, outstanding for shooting in a sunny afternoon, the bank on the other side at 23L hold is amazing in the morning too
    Now if some of the MAN locals could just sort out the weather:D 😀 Lance???:dev2:

    in reply to: Boxing Day at EGPH #441824
    Tartan Pics
    Participant

    Nice work Rab.Getting the hang of the new camera then?
    Hope you had yer long johns on there big yin. brrrrrr. Great catch getting the Aer Arrann .

    in reply to: First Bunch from Lanzarote 10-20/12/07 #441829
    Tartan Pics
    Participant

    Fantastic Dan!! real classy set there. Lanzarote looks the business, i take it the beach in your landing shot is accessable?, think i know where i’ll treat her indoors to a holiday this year:dev2:

    in reply to: AN225 at PIK – by Mark Harkin #441833
    Tartan Pics
    Participant

    Excellent stuff mr H. And welcome to the forum…..eventually:)

    in reply to: Gatwick with my new 400D! #441927
    Tartan Pics
    Participant

    Hi Josh
    Welcome to DSLR world.
    A fair attempt, as Allen says above a wee bitty underexposed. Which you will no doubt know. Practice makes perfect, keep fiddling away, you WILL get there,real soon.
    PS Check your PM’s
    Cloud:
    Not being familiar with the camera, i assume it is a point n shoot?, they seem a bit blurry/unsharp. perhaps you are using the cameras zoom full?? which can result in instability and grainy shots. A few also are “missing bits” tails cut etc… compose your shot before pressing the trigger, no need to use full zoom and try fit the subject into a tight frame,zoom out and give yourself some breathing space, get the whole subject in,and you can always fix the crop/rotation etc.. later with photoshop or something. Good set though.

    in reply to: Photo of the week??? #441930
    Tartan Pics
    Participant

    A fine shot DJ, worthy of the title IMO, I am by far no expert on aviation photography, but i know what pleases my untrained eyes!! it is well cropped, sharp with good detail for a night shot,nowt up with that as i see it (as a viewer) i just really can’t get what is so worthy of a shot that is frankly of very poor quality,with no content in sharp focus, and suffers extreme camera shake (fair ’nuff for a landing shot from the flightdeck) by a photographer whose other stuff is of a far far higher standard!
    I’m sure thousands of photographers, still scratching their heads over why their hi quality shots get rejected, log in to JP front page, see this and feel slapped in the face! It does,IMO, a bit of damage to JP to have the “shot of the week” such a poor shot, Perhaps A-Net’s absurdly OTT and ludicrous screening process (to those not bezzy pals with the screeners)has a point after all??:confused:

    in reply to: Photo of the week??? #441943
    Tartan Pics
    Participant

    Ahh good point TDM, that could explain it, but, IMO the shot is not good enough to even be on the database, going by some of the shots that you see on here and other fora that are rejected by JP.

    in reply to: Photo of the week??? #441948
    Tartan Pics
    Participant

    Jim a singer ???? NAW !!!!:D

    Well… at least tyhats what he said he was when he auditioned hehe:eek:

    in reply to: Photo of the week??? #441979
    Tartan Pics
    Participant

    Sam:
    I can see the attraction simply because it is a flightdeck shot, also the fact it is a fisheye shot.
    But there are tons of flightdeck night time shots on JP that are well… sharp!:dev2:

    in reply to: Airbus and Boeing model numbers #568243
    Tartan Pics
    Participant

    I believe it is more or less as Frank explains, with Boeing the -100,200,300,400,500
    all seen as “old” -600,700,800,900 are all the “Next Generation” a symbol of cleaner/quieter/cost efficient aircraft.
    FYI different airlines/etc… do have different Boeing customer codes.. all here:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Boeing_customer_codes

    in reply to: Photo of the week??? #441991
    Tartan Pics
    Participant

    Was thinking along the same lines Allen… Shurely that would NEVER happen??
    P.S. Allen, turns out someone you know is the singer in my band!!.. Jim Reid? somehow it came up in rehearsals last week(also, the jammy beggar won a Harley on the radio last week:mad: 😀 )

    in reply to: Photo of the week??? #442003
    Tartan Pics
    Participant

    Yeah,Jason. I agree, i also have had shots rejected that are of good/fair quality, some stuff from my recent Asia trip that are’nt in the JP database at all (even a first shot of type!!)all of at least decent quality (or at least as good as the one’s i have accepted). I was thinking there must be some sort of “artistic” merit to this shot,maybe??, that is whooshing over my head,that qualifies it as shot of the week.

    in reply to: Rocketing to Tokyo: FUK-HND on JAL (ex-JAS) 777-289 (+pics) #405951
    Tartan Pics
    Participant

    Excellent report, Japan is just awesome for spotting/shooting. Must get back some time soon.
    P.S. your report looks like it should have pictures?? in some parts. Can’t see any, do you have any shots?
    Good work all the same.

    in reply to: This week…. in pictures!! #442105
    Tartan Pics
    Participant

    Cheers Josh.. you too
    Heslop.. they don’t!! AFAIK the Lufty A310’s were withdrawn around 2004. The one in the shot is an A300B4.

Viewing 15 posts - 916 through 930 (of 1,748 total)