As far as Im aware the the targeting pod will go on one of the slots usually used by an AMRAAM or METEOR.
That’s right, Eurofighter adverts always show it in that position.
Also it would seem that Flight Global got their info wrong:
How? that quote lists the load in the pic you posted. The only thing wrong with it is that they should have said six LGBs and one fuel tank or four LGBs and three fuel tanks.
The primary and secondary ECS heat exchanger outlets are further forward at the roots of the leading edge flaps. HX inlets are between the main engine inlets and fuselage.
According to my cutaway the primary and secondary ECS heat exchangers are between the vertical tails, on top of the starboard and port engine respectively.
The outlets at the roots of the leading edge flaps (on top of the LEX) are combined engine inlet bleed cell and fuel/air heat exchanger exhausts.
First time on any forum.Here are the specs. for the Vosper Thornycroft Harrier Carrier concept. These were posted on another Forum several yrs. ago & also match the specs. printed in the book Wings Across the Ocean a history of Aust. Naval Aviation.I don’t have a pic.
Full load disp. 7200t
Length overall 135m
Length at waterline 122m
Flight deck beam 28m
waterline beam 21.2m
Draft 6.5m
Ships fuel 740t
Aircraft fuel 570t
Range @ 16kts. 4500nm
Max speed 25kts.
Max power 32000 shp Gas Turbines
Fresh water 70t
Provisions for 60 days
Naval Aviation Stores for 45 days
Max complement 385
The ship was to be fitted with 3 twin 40mm Breda guns.It was to be powered by 9 gas turbine generators driving 2 electric motors.Four of the turbines were to be locatedaft right below the flight deck and five below the starboard island superstructure.Capacity was to be 8 Harriers & 2 Helos. The article noted that the ship would be ideal for disaster releif as up to 20mw of power could be generated and transferred ashore.
The book I mentioned also lists the carriers & carrier concepts submitted to the Aust. Govt. as a replacement for the HMAS Melbourne in1977.Icould list these ships & specs. if you like
I’d love to see this idea updated for the F-35B age, if the ship used the latest ”off the shelf” gas turbines, electric propulsion pods and ship systems it would be a superb multi-role asset.
It could act as a hospital ship, troop and equipment transport or a depot ship for support and repairs. It doesn’t need it’s own airgroup it just carries what ever is needed for the occasion. The large deck area could be used for mounting cruise missile launchers or even Army artillery pieces and be used as an Arsenal ship 😀
I’m certain even British yards could deliver one of these basic carriers for less than the £600 million price tag of a T45 Destroyer but I guess the RN is too much in love with it’s multi billion pound CVF program to even consider risking looking at another carrier concept 🙁
I have just looked at a cutaway I have of the Super Hornet and it turns out that they are part of the environmental control system (ECS) that provides cooling for the radar among other things.
The small hexagonal door is the ECS auxillary inlet for the heat exchanger which exhausts out of that slit or the new style nozzles (it’s called the ECS ram air exhaust).
Maybe the new style exhaust improves air flow through the heat exchanger to improve cooling for the new AESA radars.
This one is pretty good too http://www.navy.mil/management/photodb/photos/040720-N-5253L-004.jpg
My guest is that the new style could have a better IR signature, what do you think?
This Hi-Res pic shows off the old style outlet pretty well http://www.navy.mil/management/photodb/photos/050702-N-5781F-165.jpg
😮 Fantastic pics shiplover!
Welcome to the forum, it’s nice to have another small carrier fan around 🙂 Have you seen the Lets see some mini/small carriers thread yet? http://forum.keypublishing.co.uk/showthread.php?t=40890&page=1&pp=30&highlight=small+carriers
I think this is a redesigned exhaust for the bleed air system(?) on AESA equipped Super Hornet’s. I can’t find a numbered cutaway that confirms this but these pics show the difference.
http://www.flightglobal.com/ImageArchive/Cutaways/Miliary%20Aviation/Mi…
…then a few years later battle merged with Action, and went by the title of Battle Action for a while.
Actually it was called Battle Action Force for a while and I think it went back to just Battle when the Action Force toy range changed name.
I had hundreds of the comics and me and my brother had a large portion of the Action Force range. I still can’t believe I gave them all away when we moved house 🙁
Action Force toy range http://www.geocities.com/MKBIP/webpages/actionforce.htm
http://www.qinetiq.com/home/newsroom/presspacks/fia2006presspack.Par.0001.File.pdf
ITN journalist flies QinetiQ’s VAAC Harrier to demonstrate advanced control system
Demonstrating the prowess of the development of ‘Unified Flight Control’, which is a novel control concept developed for the Short Take Off Vertical Landing (STOVL) Joint Strike Fighter (JSF), an ITN journalist with no previous flying experience last week flew and landed QinetiQ’s unique Vectored-thrust Aircraft Advanced flight Control (VAAC) Harrier, which is a research test-bed for the control system. Prior to flying the aircraft, the journalist, Lawrence McGinty, spent just one day with the company ‘flying’ its VAAC Harrier simulator under the guidance of ATEC test pilot, Lt Chris Götke RN, who flew in the front seat of the VAAC during the flight.
The advanced control system developed for the JSF is designed to make the aircraft extremely easy to fly. Test pilot Justin Paines said: “Flying a Harrier is notoriously difficult and requires extensive specialist training and frequent practice along with the right aptitude from the start, but flying and landing the VAAC Harrier, with its advanced control system, is as easy as parking a car.”
In 2002, Lockheed Martin selected ‘Unified Flight Control’ for the STOVL JSF aircraft. This concept was pioneered and matured by QinetiQ in partnership with the UK MOD, JSF Programme Office and Lockheed Martin. The system enables the pilot to simply command the aircraft to go faster or slower and up or down whilst the fly-by-wire control system does all the hard work.
The development of the STOVL flight control technology has advanced significantly within QinetiQ in both guidance and flight control. From a limited vertical landing capability just 10 years ago it has progressed to today’s multiple research capabilities throughout the STOVL flight envelope – from take-off to rolling and vertical landings ashore and vertical landings at sea.
Last year the VAAC Harrier reached an important milestone in its risk reduction programme when it achieved the world’s first automatic landing of a STOVL aircraft on a ship.
😀 I want a go!
This control technology must be ideal for fly by wire helicopters too, it would totally revolutionize VTOL operations.
I have seen the same story as you Arthur,well at least I read it somewhere on several occasions “No VIFFing during Falklands conflict, some reasons were given but I have forgotten them
IIRC, VIFFing is useful for getting enemy fighters of your tail in a dog fight, the Fleet Air Arm pilots never knowingly had this problem so the tactic wasn’t used during the Falkland’s war.
Thanks AndersN, very interesting posts 🙂 I had not heard of this project before, why was it abandoned in 2005?
Isn’t the CRV-7 supposed to have better performance than the Hydra rocket?
Despite my remarks in post #14, Flight has now bitten the bullet and is offering cutaways as part of its digitised archive project:
http://www.flightglobal.com/StaticPages/cutaways.html
Fantastic! Well spotted Papa Lima 🙂 I wonder why Flight is being so generous these days? Let’s hope Key will follow their example 😀
I’d like to see all future VTOL capable aircraft (Harrier, F-35B, V-22 and helicopters) using VAAC control technology
VAAC Harrier – Easiest plane to fly ever? http://forum.keypublishing.co.uk/showthread.php?p=969321#post969321
It replaces the Harrier’s 2 engine controls (throttle and nozzle position control) with 1 control which acts as a speed selector.
If the Harrier is stationary with the engine running and speed selector in the zero speed position, you can pull back on the stick and do a vertical take off, then if you push the speed selector forward the Harrier transitions to normal flight. Pulling the speed selector back will make the Harrier transition to the hover and pushing the stick forward will make it land vertically!
VAAC is flying again 🙂 http://www.flightglobal.com/Articles/2006/07/18/207826/JSF+risk-reduction+flights+resume.html
I hope this technology makes it’s way on to all VTOL aircraft, it will save a fortune in training costs and accident rates.