This is a excellent site for info on CVF, Richard Beedall’s Navy Matters
http://frn.beedall.com/index.html
This site is worth a look too
http://www.futureaircraftcarrier.co.uk/
CVF image from October 2004
General Dynamics team entered a trimaran design in the Littoral Combat Ship (LCS) competition.
http://www.naval-technology.com/projects/littoral/
Just watched the trailer again and noticed that all the aircraft appear to be V/STOVL capable.
If you watch the aerial refuelling scene frame by frame you can see vertical jet exhaust coming from the main nozzles and from F-35 JSF style doors just behind the cockpit.
Doesn’t make alot of sense but it looks cool anyway:)
Trailer here- http://www.apple.com/trailers/sony_pictures/stealth/
SteveO,
Can u give any hard specs for the SeaKing Mk7 ASaC ???
Not really, can’t find any performance data for the radar.
Here are some links
http://www.airforce-technology.com/projects/seaking/
http://www-v3.thalesgroup.com/airbornesystems/activities/systems/airborne_radars/1_187_207_74.html
It looks like the Replica program owes alot to the work BAE did with McDonnell Douglas on their JSF proposal.
You are correct for early development, but I reffered to final competition.
In final competition YF-22 had PW F-119 engines. Northrop chose GE F-120 variable cycle engine for its YF-23.
Are you sure?
I thought it was the USAF that made the decisions, not Northrop.
Take a look at Richard Beedall’s Navy Matters site http://frn.beedall.com/fsc.htm
It has a good section and links on Trimaran designs.
Benefits of the A-7 also include a small deck footprint (folding wings) and a engine similar to AMX (both Rolls-Royce Spey). Also it has the same undercarriage as the S-3 Viking which might help with spare part issues if the Navy wants to operate the S-3.
In my opinion the most sensible solution would be to go STOVL and buy some ex Marine AV-8Bs.
The most interesting solution would be to join up with Russia, India, and China and develop a new range of carrier aircraft.
Thanks Wanshan, I thought the YA-7F was a figment of my imagination, sounds ideal for the Brazilians, but I can’t see it happening.
Wow. I’d love to see the YA-7F get reborn. I’ve always thought the A-7 was such a great plan, and to see it in that guise would be awesome! Anyone know what projected performance would have been?
Heres some info http://www.hill.af.mil/museum/photos/coldwar/a-7.htm
The Royal Navy weapons gallery is worth a look http://www.royal-navy.mod.uk/rn/content.php3?page=670&gmode=quick&cat=79
YF-23 was a bit faster in dry thrust ( not much) and was stealthier design but it lost for two reasons:
-Its engines were of new and unproven design ( variable cycle ), and for that reason very expensive too, with questionable reliability.
-Its behaveour at high angles of attack left much to be desired. It was directionaly unstable at high Alpha flight because of small vertical tail area and other reasons.
Because of that, it would have no chance in close combat against modern fighters like Mig-29 or Su-27.So, choice was correct.
Your wrong about the engines, there where 2 prototypes of each ATF design, one powered by P&W F119 engines, the other by GE F120 engines.
I have a very dumb question, since the Rn has small carriers, does it have any AEW planes flying off the carrier, my hunch would be a big no?
Yes, the Sea King Mk7 ASaC – Airborne Surveillance and Area Control (previously Airborne Early Warning).
http://www.royal-navy.mod.uk/static/pages/2008.html
http://www.deagel.com/pandora/?p=mn00067001
Quote-The ARMIGER missile is being developed by the Diehl Corporation (BGT subsidiary) to replace existing HARM missiles in the German Air Force by the end of the decade.
Fantastic work Jozef, what are the weapons under the TSR2s wings?
Quite interesting as it shares some close resemblance to a concept from AVPRO !
I thought it looked familiar, AVPROs FOAS concepts.