As MerlinPete says it is the unique and distinctive sound that the Merlin and Griffon makes that we are discussing. I think we would all agree that many factors such as exhaust systems and overlap etc will change the overall sound but that distinctive characteristic underlying sound is still always there making the engine clearly identifiable.
Minimans Are not TempestNut post #5 and MerlinPete post #9 saying that from their experience the Griffon makes the same sound irrespective of overlap and spanning the overlap value of a Merlin, at least from the figures given, 28-43-74? I appreciate that there are also many marks of Merlin. Presumably the overlap in the Merlins varies so does this change the sound?
Would this not indicate that fundamentally it is not the overlap that is producing the difference in sound between a Merlin and Griffon?
Merlinpete From what I can see on the Shackleton manifold each bank combine into a single pipe. Is that correct? Would you say that the “pulses” coming from these pipes would still be basically the same as stubs added together such that Beermats theory in #45 could still work.?
Mike Yes I did but you have put it better.
Beermat I think you could well have it here! Interference would give you the pulse effect you can hear. Comparison with light is perfectly valid and obviously clearly visualised with Moire Patterns clearly showing the pulse effect. I have to say that’s a brilliant correlation bringing the firing sequence together with interference patterns, well thought of. And as Mike called it the PRF gives it that gruff sound.
all arm-waving stuff,
Me too. Agree doppler doesn’t come into it now I have refreshed my 45 year old memory. Thinking what is likely to make so much noise with so much energy? Surely if it was mechanical that wouldn’t be good. Whilst not pretending to understand Spartabus’s posts I think he has a point and it is likely to be exhaust related which presumably is also related to cam timing and firing order which is what Creakingdoor said back at #7.
That recording is of the plane approaching, passing and going away. I would think that Doppler effect must come into play here somewhere. But I wonder if we/I am looking in too much detail The difference is fundamental we need a sound engineer who can recognise which part of the waveform is producing the sounds we are talking about. I can see where you are going with the pulsing but I still think the more square basic waveform of the Griffon could be producing the gruffness. Of course the two together…..
My sample was the Grace Spit. Have expanded it up similar to yours and I think it looks smoother, so un-surprisingly not all Merlins are the same. I took my sample from when I judged the plane was going past the recorder rather than coming towards or going away, good luck with that! However, isn’t the thing that the engines sound different basically at all times so there must be a fundamental difference which should be identifiable and then related to an or several event frequency/ies in the engines.
Possibly need to be a bit careful here I note that the Merlin is a flac file which is good but the Griffon is a wav, not sure about those. But the sample rate can make a lot of difference to the sound especially with the low frequencies which is why us oldies find mp3s a bit tiny compared with vinyl and valves!! Really need two stationary engines running at the same RPM and recorded with the same equipment. I’ll just pop out and do that now.:highly_amused:
I am certainly no sound expert but to go from a pure sinusoidal wave form sound to a square one like a buzzer do you not add in more what I am calling hairlines until what was a sin wave becomes more square. Can we not see from the wave forms that the Merlin is much closer to a sin wave than the Griffon.
Sure you are all heading in the right direction just need an engine guy to relate the frequencies off the graph with what’s going on in the engines.
Though I agree high frequency pulses probably produces a gruff sound. By which I mean frequent pulses.
Are we not looking at stereo. ie left and right channels, I do not understand why they would be significantly different.
Beermat could you do one for the merlin like your first post.
Is it not the hairiness of the basic waveform that produces the gruffness? I suspect this will not be so much on the Merlin.
Wave form of Griffon (top) Merlin (bottom)
It is no surprise that the Griffon looks gruffer.
I wonder if looking at the wave form of the sound of these two engines would show what was producing the noise. Presumably would have to be careful regards number of blades and superchargers. If a basic frequency could be pulled out then it may be relatable to a frequency of recurring events within the engine.
This site has recordings of both the Merlin and Griffon
http://www.freesound.org/people/J%C3%BCrg%20L%C3%A4chler/downloaded_sounds/
Nice to be able to compare them whilst this interesting discussion develops.
Is this the one
WIKI COMMONS Credit to owner RuthAS
Rolls-Royce Tyne testbed Avro Lincoln G-37-1 at Farnborough 8th September 1956 flying on only the nose Tyne with the four props feathered.
And, of course, at Farnborough 1956 a Lincoln carried out an impressive display with all four Merlins feathered!
Jim
Does a Tyne come into this somewhere?