I have a friend in the Borders police,and they are still very much involved with the G8,as are probably ALL forces in Scotland. All their leave has been cancelled over this period.
My devious mind led me to the Red Arrows show calendar site,because I wondered if perhaps they were the REAL reason for the cancellation of the EF show. They don’t show EF on their calendar,and makes me wonder if it was EVER there! You get my drift? If they couldn’t get the Arrows,then who would go to the show?(thinking general public here). If I am totally wrong,then I apologise,but I’m VERY suspicious!
OSH, I think you are wrong about this as I seem to remember the early shows being somewhat a local sucess and only got better every year. That was before the red arrows. I assume not every airshow has the red arrows in attendance and are very successful so I would assume your comment is wrong.
Robert, I noticed that on the Evening News too. Also noticed that the Duke of Hamilton had made a commet about the Reds using Leuchars and so could some of the bigger aircraft and also that the smaller aircraft could use Archerfield.
Makes you think the Duke should put on a smaller display from Archerfield himself if it viable. I dont know the possibility of this as I have never seen the Archerfield area before.
Just go to Duxford Merlin.
Well Der if East Fortune IS going to be on then I wasnt going to Duxford this year anyway. I was going to go to East Fortune, Elvington and Leuchars.
Just waiting to hear the news thats all.
How can a “Museum” lack enthusiasm.If you are saying that there is a lack of enthusiasm, it can only be about the staff. How am I not supposed to take that personally?
Fair enough point taken. I withdraw my comment and apologise for saying that the museum lacked enthusiasm.You are right in saying that it can only be the staff that I am critising and when I look at it from your point of view I can see that now. But sometimes it seems like nothing is being done about things or that there could be more done. Down to the point of even advertising for local help instead of contractors to tidy up or paint doors etc etc. All this would save money in the long run.
Let me just tell you something. I’ve not yet been there three months, and already I’ve worked about the equivalent of a week and a half in flexi-time which is more than can be carried forward and therefore I will never get paid for. I’m not complaining about this – I’m happy to have done it and get through the work needing attention.
If you are not complaining about it then why mention it. I too dont get paid for any overtime I work but I work it just the same so that my job is made easier the next again day. I even work on Saturdays for no pay. There are many of us who work for little or no pay.
I’m trying to ensure that the collection is properly documented so that we know what we’ve got.
And you are to be congratulated in bothering to do this why else would you be appointed assistant curator unless you could do the job.Well done.
Without this, we can’t look after it. But don’t tell me the museum is not enthusiastic because I can only be offended when such inaccurate comments are made. I stand by my earlier statement – please withdraw your comment.
Answered at the start of the page RE Apology.
As regards planning for the airshow, has anyone making comments here on this subject ever organised a civil airshow? Our events officer does it single-handed, along with a multitude of other events throughout the year and is under a lot of presssure. She didn’t want to cancel, but has been facing increasingly impossible odds. How about supporting the museum which you claim to enjoy, rather than complaining about the cancellation of one event in an otherwise busy calendar. And it’s not as if there is no flying taking place at the Museum of Flight at all this year. The airshow is one day – the WWII weekend is two days. Where is everyone saying “well done” for that. Exactly! Some things are just beyond our control and you have to look at the bigger picture. I’m happy to take constructive criticism, but whingeing is no help whatsever.
Just remember it is the whingeing public that make the museum and pay your wages without which there would be no museum and indeed no jobs. I have supported the museum over the years and you know that from quite a few years back. I havent had a go at the event planner organiser as such but there is one thing I totally disagree with is having one person organising the events when at other events around the country it takes a whole army to organise such things. This should be amended but as for her being under pressure well arent we all. I would love to swap jobs for a week and see what its like to do something I love under pressure rather than something I put up with.As for VE/VJ day why would we want to say well done until we have actually experiance the weekend I dont have the powers to see into the furture and besides it might turn out to be a complete waste of time. Who knows? In the other hand later on in the year once it has passed I may well be saying great show how about one like that next year etc etc. We will just have to wait and find out.
As regards the suggestion that we are no longer interested in the long term preservation of our entire aircraft collection, this takes time and money which Concorde will unlock. Development of the museum on a scale never possible before should take place, but it doesn’t happen overnight. Yes, three of the hangars are not ideal conditions, but there are restrictions to what work can be carried out due to the site being a scheduled monument, etc. Look at how many months it takes to build a small conservatory – scale that up and you can only begin to imagine the task involved in bringing the whole site up to the standards we would wish to see. This is only possible because of Concorde, which is definitely good for the museum. But to suggest that I’m not interested in preserving our aircraft collection is deeply offensive and personally hurtful.
Never once did I say the staff were not interested in the preservation of the aircraft but the organisation of the aircraft at present is less than ideal is it not. I remember someone on her complaining about some aircraft sitting in pools of water in damp condition under a leaking roof.
What I did say was and I quote.”but Jonathan dont you feel the same about the level of care the aircraft at the museum get. And I dont mean the level of care the staff give them.”
Perhaps it is mor eto do with the managment of the museum rather than anything else then. As it is always the management who get the blame. I wish I could remember back to some of our conversations over the years about the museum I seem to remember some fierce critisim from yourself over the years Ian.
I have to say, these comments over the past few days don’t exactly make me feel like welcoming a forum visit. I thought members throught more of me than this, but clearly not. You are all welcome to visit and I hope you enjoy the museum, but I’m not sure that I want to participate in any such visit.
I hardly think these comments are fair as it is only me really that has said anything about the museum and not any of the other scottish forumites so please dont take out your frustration on them. Please dont feel that you wouldnt be invited or welcome to any forum visits in the future as I wouldnt like to feel that this was because of me. And for the record Ian I have seen you do more for the museum in your short time there than some others have done in years so I do respect you and the job you do I just dont have to agree with you 100% of the time. Anyhow if the other forum members decide not to invite myself to a museum visit because of this then so be it. I can visit myself anytime as a paying member of the public although it was nice to be part of a group visit and I think another is long past due but does anyone want to organise one.
One last thing I know I am not the only person to have these thoughts and that a lot of others will have the same thoughts and feelings its only that I just cant let them go without saying something. Better to have said something at the time and regret it later than to have kept quiet and wondered what might have been.
Well,everyone knows that G8 was just ‘sprung’ on them! I’m sorry,but there is a complete lack of lateral thinking in my opinion.I’m not saying that G8 was known about at last year’s event,but it has been known about for some considerable time.
I am also concerned that the policy has shifted from the ideal of preserving aircraft for prosperity,and charge to let the public see them,to ‘we’ve got Concorde now,we can dispense with all these other aircraft,the public will come in droves,and pay more’
Just my thoughts,the fire proof suit is on!
Not sure I agree with your opinion on the case of concorde but say no more we have all been down this road before.
Must agree with the G8 comment though.
And the “I want the moon on a stick” award goes to….
but Jonathan dont you feel the same about the level of care the aircraft at the museum get. And I dont mean the level of care the staff give them.
Also while I am still in rant mode. At last years PFA Flyin we didnt see the ballon burst or other such displays as in years gone by. This was due to “insert your answer here”
Well from the words of a pilots mouth that was at the flyin. “We didnt get asked to provide a display by the museum therefore cant display”
Pathetic!!!!!
Will this wrong be righted this year. Usaully we at least see Jim McTaggart perform brillantly with his aerobatics and usaully the Duke of Hamilton will display and Gavin Hunter if asked.I remember the Hurricane and the Avenger too all of which displayed why cant we have all this back is there a safety reason??
I will be at any of the flying events at east fortune as I love the place but do not have to like the way it is run or what happens there and as a paying member of the public should I not be allowed MY OPINION. Even if it is adverse to the beliefs of others.
I must say that I take personal exception to your comment that the museum staff have a lack of enthusiasm. On what basis do you make this comment? I find it highly offensive and would strongly encourage you to withdraw it and apologise. 😡
Ian please read my comments before you take them personally. My comment wa that the Museum lacks enthusiasm when it comes to these things and not the STAFF. I was commenting on the way the museum has been held back over the years and for “planning reasons” etc we have seen the decline of the airshow from a 3 day spectacular to 1 day. Sorry I will have to correct myself it was a 2 1/2 day spectacular.We have seen promises of bus services for years which from other sources comment seems to have been rubbish. But I cannot comment on the service now as I havent heard any feed back as to what the service is like now that concorde has finally arrived. I know some buildings have been repaired or renovated but what of the important ones that house the proper collection of aircraft are they too to be airconditioned and dehumidified in time or are they to stay original. We have seen the Yes we will buy the runway etc etc etc this story is now so boring I dont even listen to it any more. This was the plan at one time wasnt it.
Personally Ian I find the staff at the museum rather plesent when I have visited but is there one member of staff down there who wont complain or have a complaint about the way the museum is run.
Now do you still wish me to apologise or can my commetns now be taken in the context they were meant in.
I am like anyone disappointed in this decision to cancel the airshow. As in my opinion there could be alternate arrangements and sorry to disagree with you Ian but the way the papers reported the story was that Edinburgh Airport could not cope with the increased air traffic and ground handling required not that the airspace was controlled or indeed restricted. Is it not the case that some of the smaller aircraft like the Pitts, Starduster, Extra and insert as many more aircraft of this size as you want can all land and take off on the microlight runway. Obviously larger aircraft might cause problems but what wrong with approaching RAF Boulmer and RAF Leuchars. I am sure that these airfields would accomodate the aircraft. The airspace can and should be controlled and give aircraft landing at Edinburgh plenty room to move about freely and give airshow traffic plenty space to perform especially if coming form the south. And hang on a moment couldnt Newcastle airport help out too. Hey just had a though some larger aircraft could even take off from Glenrothes. Wow never knew there so many alternates.
I am starting to grow tired of the museums inability to provide alternate planning and lack of enthusiasm to try and provide the proper care that the aircraft at the museum and the public require.
I had been given a choice this year by my wife. East Fortune, Elvington and Leuchars this year or Duxford and Leuchars and because of the recent decision to cancel my hand has been forced.
Of course it is not impossible that a model event could be pulled of to take on the roll of the airshow arround that time. A lot of people would go to that sort of event just approach the Large Model Association and I bet they could pull off a good show. We need a model show on the East of Scotland as this years Scottish Model Airshow is going to be in Dumfries and Galloway at Castle Kennedy and a lot of people who had gone to Glenrothes said they will not travel to Dumfries. Cmon MoF get the Large model guys in and get a show organise for the airshow weekend and I bet it will get a good crowd. Also it may just persuade me to stay in Scotland and go to it instead of Duxford and then next year I will go to Duxford.
http://www.transportphotos.com/Air/PN48/Military%20Selection.doc
This is the only link to any kind of picture I could find during a quick search. It has a Black and White picture listed on the document.
Goodluck in your search for a colour photo and I hope you find one.
I do not wish to sound rude but have you actually read any of my posts on this subject.
I have NOT once said I am going to fly it, the bloke I am building it for probably will not fly it even if he dose nobody will get hurt if he slams it into the ground at a million miles an hour as he lives on a farm only if somebody is trespassing will they be hurt should it be flown and hit the bit of ground they are standing on.
I have disabilitys myself and find great joy in building models, this is the first R/C model I have built even though it is not for me even though it will not fly I will not be cutting corners as I take pride in my work.
Yes I have read your posts and apologise if I have misread your post but I understood from the beginning that it was not your Spitfire and your were building it for someone. I was meaning go fly the mustang if it has the ability or is it an large airfix etc.
And without trying to be too funny about it IF this bloke decides to fly his aircraft he WILL actually require insurance because if he does not and in turn kills a passerby trespassing or not or even does any damage to anything not his own he could end up in prison. First word of advice ALWAYS have insurance. At Last count I think our club insurance covers us for £5 Million.
I hope the model you are building gives you great pleasure in building it and that you dont have any problems with any parts as I hope we wont.
(That is why my big Mustang is finished but still on a shelf waiting for my skills to catch up with my confidence…. re. Piper Cub vs. tree fiasco )
Cmon get a grip of yourself man. I have crashed 2 aircraft to date and still I push the boundaries of model flight. I had a mid air experiance with my plane and my brothers and a large model 83″ span that lasted 4 flights due to a battery detachment. Still I chuck my mustang about the sky. I now have an even bigger project on the go which is 93″ span and all the gear to date has cost roughly £1500. And how pray tell shall I fly this aircraft. Chuck it about the sky I will all be it in a scale manner. Just go for it and if it ends up in bin bags then its only money just build another.
Now for the serious bit. Kiddies who have bought the spit and never flowen before please go and buy a trainer aircraft and learn on it first. Visit your local club and try and get an older trainer from a club member and some gear. Also join a club and fly with the trainer while building you spit. In a years time when you have finished the spit you might be able to fly a low winger and will have gotten valuable rebuilding skills after your many bangs and scrapes.
I dont mind admitting that we are buying the magazine for our son. He has shown a very keen interest in building the spit. He is disabled and enjoys building things. The format suits his needs a couple of parts each week to fit onto the model and he is happy.For me its not about the money its about seeing the enjoyment on my lads face when he completes the first part of his model.
I am one of those people who believe it is better to try and fail than not to try at all
This is the best comment on this thread by far.
Well done DGH
As a person who has never had the pleasure of seeing a vulcan in the sky I just want to see it actually take flight because its been a long time coming.
so there.
That’d be a Mk1, wouldn’t it? (Or if not, then a MkV that started out as one?)
There’s a subject for a model…! 😉
Aha the plot thickens. On consulting my little book of spitfire I noticed that the aircraft was struck off charge after this accident but then went to Scottish Aviation Ltd.
Heres a breakdown of what I can make sense of.
Supermarine Spitfire R7152 MK1E fitted with a Rolls Royce X engine. 1481st aircraft off the production line. First flight 24/02/1941. Taken on charge with 9 MU on 26/02/1941 and then on to 123 Sqn on 22/06/1941 before going onto 58 OTU on 02/10/1941 and being crashed on 05/10/1941. It was then struck off charge but the date given contradicts the data previous so will assume that instead of the date being SOC 01/10/1941 that it is in fact 11/10/1941. It was then cancelled and went to Scottish Aviation LTD and onto 61 OTU on 16/6/1942 presumable after extensive repair at Scottish Aviation LTD. The aircaft then goes onto 76MU on 10/10/1942 and onto Tarantia in November 1942. Then it goes to Port Sudan 29/01/1943 before going to the Middle East on 28/02/1943 and finally being struck off charge on the 01/03/1943.
Wonder how it ended it days. Is it some pots and pans in the Middle East or is it waiting to be discovered. Perhaps we will never know.
Thanks guys for the sites. A few of the I know of and have downloaded from before.
My brother has just found a pretty effect intensive f14 tomcat on wspilot.com
Catapault launch, sonic boom and flame and vapour effects.
very nice to see this in action plus it flies nice as well.