RE: Free entry to air museums.
Hi Ashley,
Sorry to ask but after reading your post on the Moxey topic I was wondering if you would be able to help this guy or not. Here is his message.
To whom ever can help
My grandfather(Robin Goodfellow) was in the Royal Auxiliary Air Force no.603 squadron(Turnhouse) from 1934 to 1938(I believe, flying Hawker Harts).
I am searching for specific details(his rank/position,who he flew with, where he flew, training schedules and so on) of his air force career.
If anyone can provide this information or direct me to sites which will help me in my search that would be greatly appreciated.
regards
Alec Harris
any ideas. There are of course the usual sources such as innsworth and the RAF museum etc etc. But reading the other post I was wondering if you can help.
Regards Merlin.
RE: Free entry to air museums.
Thanks everyone for their information. I find Duxford a strange case but I can understand why they can and are charging for entry.
On a similar note Scottish Museum of Flight still charge as well and I think I am right in saying that this is a National Museums of Scotland site. So why do they still have charges.
In the passing and I probably shouldnt say this here but what the hell.I have heard ,nd it is showing,that the M of F are getting less and less money to run every year. And only operate the main hangar in winter as it is too cold in the jet hangar. But all credit to the staff they make the effort to open the jet hangar for at least 45 minutes so the public can get round and have a quick look. I seriously dont mind paying to get into the museum and I would go so far to say that even if the museum were to turn free entry I would still pay to get in as I want to see them get more money for what they do. And in turn it would create a better museum and better exibits in the long run. I also heard from someone, but I cant confirm the story, that the M of F are to close during the winter for 6 months as the visitor number drop dramatically and the dont turn a profit. Surely this should not effect a museum of such importance. The funding should be there for these conditions. I will try and get a statement from the museum about this but dont know if I will get a reply.
I will post more when I know more.
Merlin
RE: Air museums free entry, good or bad?
Guys I didnt know the museums were free to get into. Can anyone provide a list of exactly which museums are free for entry.
Regards Merlin
RE: What is the most risque food you have ever eaten?
not what you call risque food but I have eaten swordfish and it is the most delicious fish I have ever tasted and the most tender. The greeks do it in olive oil and it really does swim in the stuff but we got to know an English guy who had a restraunt there and he grilled the fish. it was great justd one to perfection.
I hear Ozzy Osbourne does a good line on fried bats heads.
lol
Merlin
RE: What is the most risque food you have ever eaten?
not what you call risque food but I have eaten swordfish and it is the most delicious fish I have ever tasted and the most tender. The greeks do it in olive oil and it really does swim in the stuff but we got to know an English guy who had a restraunt there and he grilled the fish. it was great justd one to perfection.
I hear Ozzy Osbourne does a good line on fried bats heads.
lol
Merlin
RE: Space Shuttle Columbia Lost over Texas
I have just heard on the news that the fuel tank insulation that was thought to have damaged the leading edge of the port wing has all but been ruled out as the cause of the accident.
The have looked at the footage and the piece of insulation similar to that on the fuel tanks and it could not have been this that caused the damage. The reason being that the insulation is little more than polystyrene foam. Much like something you would find toys packaged in.
This was reported by NASA and they are still looking for the cause.
Had I know the insulation was foam I would not have speculated that it was this that caused the damage. Still we do have the dent on the port wing the only problem now is if it wasnt the insulation that caused it what the hell did.
Regards Merlin
RE: Space Shuttle Columbia Lost over Texas
Hi Lancman,
I guessed it was Ebay but didnt know,Well done to them for acting so quickly.
I think we are just guessing here but I think the whole left wing theory happened just the way you said Lancman. Damage to the leading edge resulting in a build up of heat.
regards Merlin
RE: Space Shuttle Columbia Lost over Texas
Just heard on todays news that all the crews bodies have now been accounted for. I had posted before that about 2000 pieces of wreckage had been found but in todays news it was reported that over 1000 pieces have been collected. And I was rather disappointed to hear that some sicko had seen fit to offer pieces of columbia for auction on a website but when the website realised what was going on they shut down operation and no doubt forwarded details to the authorities.
Does anyone know which site this was. Well done to them for spotting the idiot who was doing this.
I know that a few patches were found and also two helmets have now featured on the news. Do they have to show these items on public TV. I feel that as these are such personal item ie items that would have been worn around the body of the families loved one, That just to be a little bit understanding in how the families might feel about seeing this on TV.
Fair enough that the wreckage has been show. Although this aswell could be said to be hard for the families it is of global interest for people to see. And this I think should be shown as global interest But personal items such as clothing patches helmets shouldnt be show as this would have been the last thing the families would have seen their families wearing. I just think it all just too much.
NASA has been releasing a statement saying that they are investigating the build up of heat on the body of the orbiter near the tyre area. The think this is where the damaged area was but I dont know if it is the same area hit by the tank insulation or not. Before break up the sensors registered this bulid up before the readings were lost.
Can anyone else add to the story I havent really heard any more news than I have already posted in this post and my others.
As I have said before my thoughts and feelings are with the families.
Regards Merlin
RE: Space Shuttle Columbia Lost over Texas
Further to my previous post it was said on the news this morning that the fault were are with the left wing (the one that was hit by the insulation) they started to lose reading from the tyre heat sensor, tyre pressure and other sensors several minutes before break up. It has been thought that this was due to damage on the wing. It has also been said that the problems encountered were almost certainly because of the massive amount off heat given off with rentry.
the single fireball that departs from the maim body is said to be the tail plane and the puffs of smoke are meant to be the whole thing rotating out of control. As you will be aware if the body of the aircraft is exposed say the fuselage or the upper surface of the wing it is only aluminium and will melt. Thats why the tiled surface is exposed to reentry heat and kept in the nose high attitude until the get into the earths atmosphere properly when they drop the nose and glide in. It seem that the shuttle started to rotate and this is why it broke up. there are several points at which you can see puffs of smoke from the trail and this is what is happening.
I know the have found about 2000 pieces of debris but I was surprised to hear and see that they had found a body. No information has been released but they took away a body bag with what I would call a sizeable piece of a body. I dont know specific details but did see this happen on the news. Also saw a mission patch and a helmet the right way up but just sitting it look blank nothing in there it was a spooky kind of an image no face to fill the void. I know there were several other bits found but you would think there would have been nothing left of the bodies because of the heat and disintegratinon and the extremes the body would have been facing. I only hope they had a quick death and were not suffering on the way down.
Merlin
RE: email programs
outlook and netscape but mainly outlook also various web based emails (hotmail, yahoo, msn etc)
RE: email programs
outlook and netscape but mainly outlook also various web based emails (hotmail, yahoo, msn etc)
RE: Shuttle lost (blows up?) on re-entry
Guy have a look over on the flypast forum about the same topic. You will see my post about Columbia. Dont take what you see there as the truth just a summary of what I have listened to and seen on the news.
Arthur you mentioned 3 remaining shuttles. Well I dont know if NASA got it wrong and missed one out but they mentioned only 2 remain operational. ???
I dont know the whole story but it seems NASA have forgotten about one of their shuttles. Anyone else cast light on the situation.
My thoughts are with the families.
I have lived through two shuttle accidents and I just pray I never see another.
Merlin
RE: Shuttle lost (blows up?) on re-entry
Guy have a look over on the flypast forum about the same topic. You will see my post about Columbia. Dont take what you see there as the truth just a summary of what I have listened to and seen on the news.
Arthur you mentioned 3 remaining shuttles. Well I dont know if NASA got it wrong and missed one out but they mentioned only 2 remain operational. ???
I dont know the whole story but it seems NASA have forgotten about one of their shuttles. Anyone else cast light on the situation.
My thoughts are with the families.
I have lived through two shuttle accidents and I just pray I never see another.
Merlin
RE: Space Shuttle Columbia Lost over Texas
guys,
in regard to the piece that broke away from the configuration and struck the left wing.
A piece of auxillary fuel tank insulation (actually thought to be ice in the first immediate instance) detached from the tank during the rotation period and struck the port wing of the shuttle Columbia. They could not abort because they were well on their way and it was thought that it did no damage so the mission continued. ( I guess they can bring the shuttle back after take of and before entering orbit)
While the shuttle was in orbit some 80 experiments were carried out and no faults were reported so everything must have been all right then.On re-entry they did the stall move to bring them back into the earths atmoshere and they rotated and fired the rockets to fall back in. When they were re-entering they started reporting faults all on the left side. Some sensors were out and the tyre pressures were reading strange. This was the last transmission. As mission control asked them to repeat the last transmission they had heard the part about the tyre pressure but broke up on the last sentance. The crew member said roger and I think he started to say something about the tyre pressures but this was the point of the break in communication.
Next if you look at the footage of the debris. The one mass coming down is the Columbia coming down normally and if the speech and footage are put in real time.You see one big ball (columbia coming in looking ok) then a little fire ball comes off but they still have contact and you see the trail fanning out slightly then going back into a straight trail and then another and at the point where a big puff of smoke is and several trails leading off that is when all contact was lost. It was a break up in several small stages I dont know if the crew knew what was happening but it takes several seconds before it breaks up into small enough bit that the crew could be definately called perished.
It was said that the trajectory was right for a “Natural disintegration” This is what a Russian expert has said.NASA had said this too that it wasnt an explosion.
My thoughts and feelings go out to the crew members families and I hope these people didnt die for nothing and they find the fault and fix it so as the space program can continue. I feel that if all manned flight were to be stopped permanent then the people and those who died on Challenger will have died for nothing. After all how many test pilots are killed trying to improve the aircraft they are testing. This was their job its what they are good at and if anything can be learnt from their sacrifice then they didnt die in vain.
Please do not take this as solid information I have only put this together through watching all the footage and listening to some of the technical aspect that former crew have been saying.
Merlin
RE: Vulcans?
Hi guys. Correct me if I am wrong but hasnt a guy in the US of A gone and made a full size replica from composite materials.
Merlin