dark light

LoofahBoy

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 211 through 225 (of 466 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Physics question about fighter jets? #2478397
    LoofahBoy
    Participant

    What I’m getting at here about the 4.5g turn is purely a theoretical concept. You know those, uhm… “internal dampeners” from Star Trek…? http://www.cheesebuerger.de/images/smilie/konfus/a075.gif

    Lets say the plane is equipped with a device that halves the g-load an aircraft experiences by half. I know it’s completely impossible, since inertia is a core element of basic existence as we know it, but if it WERE possible (A wizard did it; there’s your explanation.) How would that work? A 9g equivalent turn, but the aircraft itself only experiences 4.5g due to that impossible technology. In other words, the planes doesn’t experience as much as a load factor as it normally should. Do you understand what I’m getting at here?

    in reply to: The PAK-FA Saga Episode IV #2478642
    LoofahBoy
    Participant

    Short video but shows a probably more recent T-50’s layout

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bk1UxjoTFA4

    Well that was… retarded. :confused:

    I wonder which plane has more fan-art made about it? The PAK FA for the J-XX? πŸ˜€

    in reply to: The best aircraft to chase UFO #2478818
    LoofahBoy
    Participant

    Lets play some serious SF speculation at the moment. Lets say today, the Earth suddenly found itself surrounded by alien motherships. The foes we are today among countries suddenly have to unite to deal with the alien threat. What would you choose as the weapon systems to best defend Homo Sapiens?

    [Might be fun to make some kind of novel or tv series out of it.]

    Cyanide pills. Would make our death a lot less painful.

    Let’s face it: if an alien species was advanced enough to cross the cosmos in a realistic time frame, then we probably wouldn’t stand a chance. Besides, they could just bombard the planet from long range just as easily.

    Now if they decided to come through, say, a wormhole they created that opened over the north pole, but they were still technologically similar to us, then that would make a good plot right there..

    BTW, for an interesting novel about an alien invasion and the world’s reaction, look up Turtledove’s Worldwar series, which features an alien civilization with tech similar to us in the 1990s, invading earth during WW2.

    in reply to: The best aircraft to chase UFO #2479106
    LoofahBoy
    Participant

    Those UFOs are said to be able to zip from zero to mach thirty in a half-second. If they really are up there, then the best bet is to let the lawnchair rednecks sitting around Groom Lake chase them with cameras.

    An aviation forum is the LAST place you should be asking this. UFOs are kind of a taboo topic amongst pilots, you know…

    in reply to: Effect of the MRCA contract on the Winner #2479919
    LoofahBoy
    Participant

    I did not say the aircraft is inferior. I implied that the claim that the AESA radar is superior is false.

    Manufacturer is saying it is not inferior to F-18E radar which is larger aircraft and more in line with Su-35. so how it is not superior to non-existent EU AESA. remember Russians work in different time lines and cost schedules that no one can match.

    Words words words.

    http://www.cheesebuerger.de/images/smilie/konfus/c028.gif

    in reply to: The absolutely WORST aircraft of all time, evar? #2480705
    LoofahBoy
    Participant

    I was waiting for the Christmas Bullet. The project was a con trick and killed every single pilot who attempted to fly it. It is universally acknowledged as the worst aircraft ever….

    From http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christmas_Bullet.

    “His design (such as it was Christmas doesn’t appear to have drawn any plans) lacked any kind of struts or braces for the wings. Christmas apparently believed that, in flight, the wings would flex or even flap like those of a bird to provide lift.”

    *facepalm*

    in reply to: Effect of the MRCA contract on the Winner #2481096
    LoofahBoy
    Participant

    Well, the French could sell their souls to somehow nab the deal with their Rafales…

    My two pesos on the contenders:

    Rafale: Certainly doable, considering that the IAF already has some French aircraft in service. But would the French be willing to cooperate?

    Typhoon: It’s relative lack of multirole capability as of the now might hurt it like in… singapore, I think it was. Besides, in general it’s pretty similar capability wise to the Su-30MKIs they already have; I’m sure the Indians would prefer something cheaper and more multiroleish, if you get me…

    F-16IN: Politics will probably stop this one (Pakistan already owns them). And buying American nowadays is just messy from what I’ve seen.

    FA-18E: http://www.cheesebuerger.de/images/smilie/boese/a030.gif

    Gripen: It can be debated that the Gripen and Tejas are too close in capability and it would become redundant. And it’s small size and payload might hurt it.

    Mig-35: Here’s the one I’m voting for. Common architecture with the IN’s Mig-29Ks and it’s already good business relationship in place with Russia speaks good things for this plane’s future. It’s a medium weight and sits right in the balance between the lightweight Tejas and the heavyweight Flanker in IAF service.

    in reply to: the best modern dogfighter aircraft? #2481308
    LoofahBoy
    Participant

    I would take MIG-35 (MIG-29K wing with TVC)

    I was under the impression that the Mig-35 as it currently stands does NOT have thrust vectoring, but comes as an export option. :confused:

    in reply to: Rafale news III: the return of the revenge #2482044
    LoofahBoy
    Participant

    Has anyone seen this simulation at all, or am I the only one?

    It exists only in your mind. http://www.cheesebuerger.de/images/smilie/frech/d045.gif

    in reply to: How successful was the Harrier? #2482071
    LoofahBoy
    Participant

    So how would you say what harrier was most capable in the A2A area in the end? The Sea Harrier FA2 or the AV-8B Harrier II+ with the radar?

    in reply to: The EuroFighter Typhoon #2482124
    LoofahBoy
    Participant

    I don’t know if this is true, but apparently if any of the computers fail in the Typhoon it’s going to crash. Unless the person who told me this was chatting rubbish! Don’t they have a back up system?

    The same could be said for ANY modern fighter with FBW and the likes nowadays. I’m not familiar with the Typh’s systems, but I do know that double/triple/quadruple redundancy is common on electric fighters.

    For example, the X-29 would fall out of the sky if it’s FBW failed, so it had a total of four identical computers; if one failed or malfunctioned, the other three could pick up the slack. You would need to have all four computers malfunction during a single flight for you to have a catastrophic failure like that, which is extremely unlikely barring an EMP pulse during a nuclear war (and at that point you have bigger things to worry about). But dont quote me on that…

    in reply to: The PAK-FA Saga Episode IV #2483359
    LoofahBoy
    Participant

    The final layout of the PAKFA?
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9h6_AvT-uv4

    The first pic is an Su-47. The second looks a lot like a raptor; it could just as well be a generic stealth mockup for this demonstration, similar to a lot of the photoshop jobs floating around on the internet.

    Still, good find.

    in reply to: the greates aircraft of all time (any country) ? #2484161
    LoofahBoy
    Participant

    The Wright Flyer. Duh. http://www.cheesebuerger.de/images/smilie/konfus/c028.gif

    in reply to: IAF – News & Discussion #2485895
    LoofahBoy
    Participant

    US Air Force’s (USAF) F-15 Tomcat

    http://img329.imageshack.us/img329/8062/facepalm2sn8.jpg

    in reply to: (Notice) UK&Ireland TV programme upcoming 24/8/08 #2486320
    LoofahBoy
    Participant

    Missiles fly straight, of course, instead of ballistic.

    Hmm? :confused: How should they fly in real life?

    And… “Mirage Rafale”? Maybe Dassault got a name change? πŸ˜€

    Quote: “Aircraft like the… French-built Rafale are widely exported and easily obtained..”

    πŸ˜€

    EDIT: The Su-47 sequence was just… *facepalm*

    And DOES the Su-47 have thrust vectoring…?

Viewing 15 posts - 211 through 225 (of 466 total)