I would like to comment that jammer design has gone to the stage where those thing can be re-programmed very quickly.
the physics of a seeker on a missile dictates that they can prob be only operating in certain bands.
you be better off having a good elint/ew capability and good programmable jammers than a number of missiles.
better yet. able to quickly tweek your missile seekers preferrablly from FPGAs.
having bunch of missile types don’t buy you a whole lot.
If it were that easy , then employing a wide band jammer would have solved all problems.
AAMs have efficient ECCM techniques with programmable logic and guidance algos.IR ones have IRCCM.
Its like a cat and mouse game.The more the mice the less a cat can catch.
So having different types of missiles with different eccms with differing methods of resistance to jamming and varying seeker sensitivities is quite helpful.
SAP 14.
Shouldnt you be starting this thread on the historic aviation forum?
The ideal diversification strategy (in terms of reducing the consequences of adversaries devising successful counters to particular weapons) would be to have a choice of both platforms & weapons, but full interoperability.
The best scenario the IAF could come up with is if they make it a condition for the selected manufacturer to integrate the astra with the mrca.
Among the current aircraft the astra is planned to be integrated with the MKI , Tejas , Mig 29 and the Mirage as well.
Maybe the Astra MKII can be added to the fgfa.
In such a case , all aircraft will have atleast 2 missiles to choose from.
The one thing that I do not understand is why throw the Derby into this mix at all?Why not integrate the RVV with the LCA for the time being?If the upgraded Mirages are getting that instead of the Mica , then ofcourse it makes some sense.
5 KJ-2000s, with information based off PLA Daily on their supposed capabilities, and we have established already that the PLAAF has an edge over the US in AEW platforms.
Lol..very true.Even accounting for serviceability , transit and rotation , the US will have a larger number of E 3 on station at any given time than the PLAAF.Plus there are the Hawkeyes.
If the RSAF got involved, are any of their Typhoons combat ready?
Surely after sending troops to suppress the revolution in Bahrain , they dont plan to ally themselves with the rebels do they ๐
Shooting down a few of Gaddafi’s obsolete aircrafts is not going to change the situation on the land.
Well said EE.
Now here is some news which proves that the ACMs hopes of resolving this by July are too optimistic.
Combat aircraft vendors still wait for setting up of price negotiation panel
Ahead of the price negotiations, a price negotiation committee has to be set up, which is a complex process,โ an industry sources told FE on condition of anonymity. โSo far, neither has the committee been set up, nor the qualifying vendors been informed. Therefore, there is no possibility of the negotiations starting by the month-end.โ
โThose who have been shortlisted have to be given enough time to get ready for the talks and even those who have failed to make the cut would get point-wise explanations from the MoD for not qualifying.โ ๐
An MoD Technical Oversight Committee (TOC) is currently looking at the โoffsetโ proposals, a requirement that the winning contractor source a certain amount of the value of each aircraft that India buys from Indian industry. Their proposals for transfer of technology are also being examined.
After this, the TOC will select three companies to go to the next stage of the bidding process.
The lowest bidder will be called by a contract negotiation committee to finalise the terms of the deal.
And what would that achieve?
see my reply in blue
their tactics would likely be relying on standoff weapons, not fighters , to achieve the minimum degree of air superiority over TW and TW Strait as their doctrine required, and use its IADS network and AWACS+fighter screens to play mostly defense, not offensive. ,
Interesting.How would standoff weapons achieve air superiority?
There was also what I think is a T 4 among the ruined aircrafts.
Added Later:Pictures
http://www.xairforces.com/newsd.asp?newsid=392&newst=6
http://thebaseleg.blogspot.com/2011/03/photos-devastation-at-matsushima.html
18(!) F 2s have been damaged.
In the long term IAF will have atleast 3 types of BVR missiles.
Astra (I and II) , something Russian , and something euro/american to go with the mrca.While it maybe possible to integrate the Astra with the PAKFA/FGFA , I dont think that would be too much of a priority.
All other types including Israeli ones will be either retired along with the carrying aircraft or replaced with Astra.
And I dont think standardising to only one type is a very good idea.Political climate is uncertain , it will be a disaster if the enemy lands up with proper EW /measures against one particular missile type.

* Pirates captured during a gunbattle with the Indian Navy onboard the INS Tabar as it makes its way to Mumbai where the pirates face further questioning.
* Image Credit: EPA
http://gulfnews.com/news/world/india/indian-navy-nabs-61-pirates-and-rescues-1.777011
Russia doesnt operate Su 30 MKI .
But with the IAF the load-out can look like this :
4 X Kh 31 P [2 X innermost wing pylons + 2 on intake pylons]
1 X El/L 8222 pod on outer wing hardpoint
1 X HADF pod centre hardpoint
2 X R 73 [wing tip pylons]
2 X R 77 [middle wing hardpoint]
Ofcourse nobody knows whether IAF uses this arrangement at all.But its possible.:D
as for Su 34