WTF is this?
Answer questions and fly an advanced fighter jet
A Swedish defence firm has brought to Indian combat aircraft lovers an opportunity to fly one of the world’s most advanced multi-role fighter jet after answering some questions posted on the company’s website.
The winner will be flown in SAAB’s most advanced multi-role fighter aircraft, the Gripen, during the Feb 9-13 Aero India air show in Bangalore.
Su 30 MKI – interesting load out of R 73 , R 77 and FAB 250s.All dummy of course.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/abhishek_photography/5074642142/in/pool-1186583@N25/lightbox/
Hercs to be inducted on 5th Feb at Hindan AFB
and..
US has removed DRDO and ISRO from the Entity (export restriction) list..
Looks like a mish mash of several attack helos and the length looks closer to Rooivalk rather than Tiger or Mangusta.The stub wings appear quite large.The exhausts are open invitation for manpads but probably will get a IR suppressor.
Well several problems with having a “only” sam network come to mind..
1.Radars can detect enemy aircraft from a long distance , but if they are not within your SAM range , then how do you intercept it and prevent it from coming within ASM/ARM launch range?
2.SAM radar do not have 100% coverage of area(terrain etc.)
3.SAMs can be taken out by a variety of methods eg cruise missiles
4.A squadron of interceptors guided by GCI is much more flexible than fixed sam sites.
5.SAM sites are vulnerable to saturation attack.
6.Aircrafts can be used for offensive roles like ground attacks , sams cannot.
well…all these points can be suitably modified for aircrafts too…for eg 10 aircrafts facing 200 aircraft guided by an awacs.
And as djcross mentioned sams and aircraft are basically the same thing except that aircrafts are more versatile than sams.none of the two are self sufficient for defence.on the otherhand having a squadron of aircraft can help in offense too , which is not possible with an only sam airforce.
India-maybe keen to acquire the capability
Well..this is from March last year..
According to Admiral Walter F Doran, president Asiafor Raytheon, Indian officials had already been briefed on “this latest radar, for highly effective 24-hour surveillance and target acquisition capability”, India Strategic magazine reported in its latest issue. The system is being operated now by the British Army and Royal Air Force (RAF) in Afghanistan with five ASTOR aircraft and eight ground stations.
Admiral Doran is quoted in the magazine as saying that Raytheon, a military technology giant, had also submitted a formal proposal to the Indian government. He declined to give details.
US offers latest airborne radar to India
dunno what came of it though..
IAF Jaguar Fleet To Be Upgraded With MBDA’s ASRAAM
seems like an advert of asraam rather than actual news..lol.
I think most of the orders to date have comprised only single digit numbers, or very low double digit numbers at the most.
Well the first Dhurv was delivered in 2002.In 8 years number of deliveries+ordered:
Domestic –
Military: 110
Civil: 26
Export (Civil+Military) ~ 30.
So in total 166 birdies.Pretty good actually.
[The actual numbers are probably more than I calculated.Check later]
There are many reasons .Like this one where the MEA prevented the sale of 7 dhruvs to bolivia due to some stupid reason!
http://indiadefenceonline.com/735/mea-rejects-hal-plan-to-export-dhruv-to-bolivia/
what kind of band and range does this baby have?
S band.There is also the possibility of having side mounted L band arrays.But not too sure about that.Range for dorsal antenna is supposed to be 300 km for 5 sq m target and 375 km in “extended” mode.Coverage -240 deg.
more here including some pictures..
http://livefist.blogspot.com/2010/07/components-of-indias-aew-system.html
http://livefist.blogspot.com/2010/07/indias-aew-programme-gets-ready-for.html
http://frontierindia.net/the-indian-aewc-project-detailed
LRDE LSTAR radar for CABS AEW&C

Yes, my point was that they cost more than the F-6s.
But I thought your point was that earlier Pakistan was distrustful of the chinese[so they got MB seats even if they cost more than the plane itself] and now that the things have moved along well and problems related to manufacturing is gone now ..so how come the JF17s still have them:diablo:
all the information are floating around, you will see what you want to see.
Not really !:rolleyes:I see what is there in the picture.My eyes can be bad but I guess this is not a forum filled with blind people!!
in the case of weapon bay, a single line in the picture could tell many things.
That single line can be either a PSed one or a true one.I cant see you being able to give points in favour of either.
if you want to prove the J20 is a inferior fighter, it is just a line PSed. or there is indeed a weapon bay, and the photo was PSed to cover the truth.
well what a joke!its got nothing for me to prove lol.It can be either way but from the present picture I just dont see it.Now if you want me to see the picture and imagine things then say so please!!Or else be happy with whatever is other people’s impression about it.
So, do you see a PSed line OR a weapon bay from the picture?
I have said it before havent I?All I see is a faint line .Dont really know whether its PSed or not and also if its not PSed , then whether it means something or not.
Even the Pakistanis were distrustful of early Chinese military aircraft. I recall that the F-6s had Martin Baker ejection seats installed that cost more than the plane!
I thought JF 17 still has MB zero-zero seats.
So, you honestly believe it’s simply poor “marketing” that’s holding the Dhruv back from winning more international orders?
Interesting.
What do you mean by “more”?
Dhurv has already been exported to 7-8 countries.
There are a lot of factors to consider eg . US coercion to buy US stuff.
This is true for all categories of non US aircraft , not only helicopters.