We are talking about a brand new 5th gen fighter here, not some upgrade of a 3rd gen fighter
When did I state otherwise?:)
India has only recently handed the ASR to Russia. There would be negotiations and only then a contract would be signed, and God alone knows how long this would take. Shri Antony is talking of inducting FGFA into IAF by 2017. PAK-FA has not yet flown. Even PAK-FA (as it would be) is EXTREMELY unlikely to make the 2017 date (you are talking about around 2020 at the earliest), let alone FGFA. If FGFA would involve (as you put it) modifying the original bird sufficiently, ANY serious work could only begin onCE PAK-FA has proven itself as a concept, and the induction date slips to beyond 2025 or so. So, either those dates given by Shri Antony are extremely optimistic or FGFA won’t differ too much from PAK-FA, i.e. MKIzation.
As can be seen from the interview by the HAL chairman above , they want to start development of the Indian variant as soon as the basic version start flight testing.As regards the timeframe..mmm I guess it is a bit optimistic.FGFA will differ that much what is required to meet Indian ASRs.
PS. My personal opinion regarding FGFA is that currently its the best option for IAF but not Indian aviation industry’s goals.
Well who(I mean Indians ) doesnt want a totally indigenous 5th gen aircraft for India.But given the current state of affairs its not possible right now.I think collaborating with Russia for the FGFA is the correct thing to do at this moment and the current focus of the Indian aviation industry should be the LCA.
Are don’t you asking a bit too much?, are don’t you overating the Indian importance in the aerospace market and technology?
The russian attitude is balance, is their program, many of you probably are still thinking the russians are broken and are willing to sell all their industrial knowledge, infrastructure and programs to India.
Nothing has been signed yet, india is not putting money in the pakfa, russians are worried to design a plane not only to sell to India, but for the worlds market
Not overrating russians, not diminishing indians, but seriously there is a bit of inflated nationalist self importance in this thread
I dont know what you are complaining about.Are you very sure about the “money” thing?
This is from a recent interview by HAL chairman Ashok Nayak
Certain modifications according to the technical requirements will be incorporated in the Indian version and these have already been discussed in detail between HAL and IAF. This then, is the starting point. As you know, it takes a few years between the prototype flight and the acceptance of an aircraft, this time will be utilised between Russia and India to work closely on the Indian version. I can say that metaphorically speaking, India has taken its first step for the fifth generation aircraft. I would also like to dispel a prevalent notion that while India will pay 50 per cent of the money, it may just get about 10 per cent of the work-share. This will not happen. India will be an equal partner in all aspects in the FGFA.
Its clear that India is paying 50% of the money atleast for the Indian version and also will get some of the workshare which is most probably productionizing some components for the Russian and Indian version and also more advanced work on the Indian version.About the Russian only version ..as I said there is very little India can contribute if at all.
Good to see you post again Ray, long time. Anyway, Shukla’s latest article seems to fly in the face of the bonhomie shown by MMS and Sarkozy in Paris for the Bastille Day parade. Sarkozy looked too damn happy – there must be something going on that sweetens the pot a bit for the French. May very well be that like the UAE chaps, the IAF will get rid of current M2k’s and forego the upgrades only to buy a large amount of Rafales.
But of course, another possibility is that India winds up buying UAE Mirages too.
One way or the other, it seems doubtful that the French will be given a total shaft – No MRCA + No upgrade – won’t be too good for a pretty well established relationship. JMT
USS.
Yeah..been busy.:)
Maybe Sarkozy was just too happy showing off his trophy wife π
I dont think IAF is in a position to get rid of the current M2Ks with the dwindling squadron levels and also considering the fondness of the IAF for these birds.Considering this..what are the options if the French continue to be obtuse?Only the Israeli upgrade i would think or relegating these birds to 2nd line aircraft after a few years.
As regarding the french being given a total shaft…more Scorpenes maybe(whats the latest news about Project 76/75B/:confused:)
Although Im not aware of this single/twin seater issue, I find it a little strange to find myself standing on the same side of the fence as you on this issue. π
According to the ToI article posted by Austin, India and Russia, after protracted negotiations and some glitches, are now going full steam ahead to finalise the joint project for the stealth fifth-generation fighter aircraft (FGFA). Since FGFA is a Russian concept and the joint project is yet to be finalised, isn’t it logical to assume that ADA/HAL etc. could not have had any INPUT (be it design or development) into this project so far?
The article also states that IAF, in fact, recently finalised the technical requirements for its FGFA, which will have long-range strike and high-endurance air defence capabilities, and submitted them to Russia. So the requirements have been submitted. Russia would review them, negotiate them with India, and so on. Now for the sake of argument, lets assume that the actual contrat for this joint venture would be signed sometime next year.
Finally, Antony, on his part, has already declared India wants the FGFA’s development to be completed by 2016 to ensure IAF can begin inducting it by 2017. Now I dont know if this is also a part of ASR or not, but what sort of contribution would Indian aviation industry be able to make to this 5th generation 50:50 project in 6-7 years times, be it the development of Radar, Engines, Stealth, Avionics etc.?
The PAKFA is a pure Russian bird and it does not meet Indian ASRs for FGFA atleast in some respects.All the agreement/contract/co-development bit is regarding the development of the India specific variant.And that agreement is yet to be finalised.Contribution of India in development of the PAKFA is very less if not altogether nil.Maybe some finances and production of some components in India(for both the Russian and Indian versions).Remember that the PAKFA has not flown yet and it will need lot more cash regarding clearing IOC,FOC and productionizing.These are the only places that India can chip in w.r.t the original PAKFA.
Now regarding the Indian FGFA , Indian contribution there could be quite a bit..ala MKI even more than that.Contributions can come in terms of avionics,use of composites (stealth?) ,productionizing many components in India ,integration of third party hardware.contributions regarding radar – not likely ,engines- zilch..other than locally producing them.From the reports it seems that the agreement to be finalised most probably also concerns modifying the original bird sufficiently to increase endurance (more fuel capacity) ,double seating and other things to meet Indian ASRs(which makes it different from just MKIzing) and that may require changing some basic design parameters which is not possible without Russian help.Hence negotiations.
okay..just got another reference..
Article :Upbeat mood at HAL
Interavia Business & Technology, July, 1994 by Hormuz P. Mama
Surprise new trainer
HAL’s big surprise is the HTT-35 trainer, aimed for the first time at the export market. “We are investing our own money,” says Sharma. “If we can get orders for about 70 to 80 aircraft from three or four customers, we can go ahead with detailed design and development, and even speed up the project.”
He hopes to export the HTT-35 even before the IAF receives its first units. First flight would be due 30 months after a go-ahead. In the Pilatus PC-9/Embraer Tucano-class, the HTT-35 will have a more advanced design and a glass cockpit. “A major advantage will be product flexibility,” adds Sharma. “It will offer a choice of engines — Garrett TPE331-12D (1,100shp) or P&WC PT6A-62 (950shp) — and equipment. This will provide customers with flexibility, so they can tailor their training according to requirements, from primary screening up to advanced and weapons training.”
http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_hb3126/is_n580_v49/ai_n28640956/
Just came upon this…HTT-35 turboprop trainer..had never heard of it before!Anybody have anymore info..?
pix of mockup..

The first photo is that of the long-forgotten HTT-35 advanced turboprop trainer, in particular its full-scale mock-up, which was designed and fabricated in-house by HAL in the late 1980s and rolled out in the early 1990sβall in all a four-year effort. The objective at that time was to team up with a global avionics supplier (most probably THALES) and co-design the semi-glass tandem cockpits and offer the aircraft for evaluation by the IAF by 1998. However, after 1994 the HTT-35 disappeared, literally!
more here
http://trishulgroup.blogspot.com/2009/10/bottoms-up-not-top-down.html
So bored by the MMRCA already looking forward to decision day.
Lol..bored already?heh we have been waiting since 2001..:D
Eventually they will come to a negiotiated price , these are common tactics adopted by OEM to get more money and end user to reduce the cost.
The upgraded Mirages will be here for the next 25 years or atleast untill 2035 , same for upgraded Mig-29.
At ~ $2 Billion the cost of upgraded 51 M2K is more than double the cost of IAF upgraded ~ 65 Mig-29 which costs ~ $ 950 million , additionally the airsuperiority Mig-29 after upgrade will get full multirole capability and a new RD-33 series 3 engine.
So it would be interesting to see what goes inside the M2K upgrade to cost $ 1 billion more for 15 less aircraft to upgrade.
Well..I am not so sure this is going to work out.Going by the recent trends in weapons purchases i think Dassault already knows that Rafale is not going to be selected for mMRCA.And the upgrade would/could not have any such stuff so as to have such a high cost.
In anycase I dont know why the IAF is ruling out an Israeli upgrade.I would have thought that would have been the better option even if the French upgrade didnt cost so much..and if you really wanted the French weapons..Mica that could be easily done with the Israeli upgrade I think.
No it is not beyond my knowledge when the establishment and the party which headed the former government is clear and definite in its public briefings. is an accomplished scientist but by no means a distinguished one. He is only famous because of this row now.
Ya are correct(obviously)!
He is the unaccomplished and undistinguished scientist standing in the same row with the other unaccomplished and undistinguished scientists of India.
And (obviously),all of them are famous because of this row now.
You have been awarded (very deserved) 10 points.

Thanks for enlightening us!
For me he has achieved nothing
He has achieved the right to stand in that row and in front of that banner hanging from the wall.Lets see you do that boss.
Santhanam is the one who proved the PRC-Pak nuke nexus while working as part of RAW, served over a decade in the DRDO shepherding our nuclear plans, has BARC has his parent organization, and people on the net, with not even a fraction of his accomplishments are to judge him.
To be a whistleblower in India, requires solid guts and big brass goolies, and one has to be so well accomplished that even the establishment is afraid to take you on. Santhanam fits all these criteria.
Good to get your views on this and agreed.
‘sometimes the naive will do more harm than the evil’
Ya are proving that right….
Good to know that Mr.Santhanam thinks we have CMD.
And did you also read this:
it really doesnt make sense that you fly the Agni missile 4000 km and deliver a 20 KT bomb.This will certainly not be in the category of what we will call inflicting unacceptable damage to the adversary who attacks us.For sure we need to carry out a proper thermonucear test.
btw..why is it good to know for you..didnt you think they were “rouge” scientists and what not , who know nothing about nuclear policy?
We do not sanction anyone because we are not in a position toientists like RC etc sanction anyone. If one day God willing we are in the position America is now you will see how hypocritical we are. In these things timing is key we must do right things at the right time and the current policy goes well with the need of the hour.
So you agree that the US is a hypocrite, and you support that and agree that it is the right way to go even if all the US has done by its hypocrisy is to hurt Indian interests?Doesnt it bother you that after all the revelations by AQ khan the US does nothing?…and I guess those who are advocating India does not need to test want India to be closer to the “west” and would not bother if India gets hurt in the process..as long as we remain close to the “West”.Kinda reminds me of this
And what “right timing” are you talking about??Did anyone (in the establishment) say such a thing as there’s gonna be a “right time” when we will test?last time I checked the government , scientists like RC etc were saying that hey we dont need to test anymore!!
What makes you so sure that testing a TN device (while it is still doubted whether the first test is successful or not) is in the interest of the countries billion people. Many have rightfully pointed out that the current deterrent level is enough.
And similarly others have said that the current level isnt enough..
If testing a TN (or indeed building a TN weapon) isnt in the interest of the billion Indian people then why did we have to do it the first time?Why did we have to do PoK II?What was it..just a million $$ showoff?
What credentials do Santhanam or all these rouge scientists have to talk about Minimum deterrence,
The same credentials that RC or AK has…..since its they who were actually concerned with carrying out teh tests ,since its they who were aware of what happened ands since its also their country after all.
NSA..puhleez that fellow only parrots whats been told to him..its not as if he has some special knowledge about nuclear science.
I would rather believe the scholarly circles who have studied the matter in much greater detail and who are level headed.
:D:D…
what matter?you mean the nuclear bomb?And your scholarly circles have studied them in greater detail than scientists like KS or other scientists who have mad their life out of working with such technology?
The reason why I doubt its a move to destabilize India’s relations with the west is that they have remained silent till now (rather than some rogue noises after the test) and decided to come out in public during this time which is signified by closer co-operation with the west, signing of the nuclear deal and IAEA waivers. It is easy to see these guys have other agendas. I won’t even be surprised if some of them are on Chinese payroll, after all DRDO and BARC only pays so less. Seeing how China Opposed the IAEA waiver given to us.
……And I thank God that those scientists had the courage to bring all of this into limelight before the final works were done..and has done a great service to this country by pre-emtively blocking (at least to some extent)the possiblilty that Mr . Mumble mumble does something under the table..
Its easy to see those “guvmint” guys have other agendas..I suspect they are on US payroll..
See your game can be played bothways..
Nevertheless do you believe when the current government and the two main political parties who may head future governments say that they are convinced the test is successful that there will be a change in that view which will necessitate further tests ? Do you recall that the Vajpeyee government was very close to signing the C.T.B.T.
And in the case of a third front alternative the disregard the CPM and its allies have toward nuclear tests are well documented. So who do you think is going to test. Santaclaus this coming Christmas ?
Whatever the government or the political parties do are in their interests..not necessarily in the interests of the country.Remember when congress did such dirty politics during Kargil Divas commemoration..?what utter disrespect to the soldiers who gave their lives for the country…is that the same political parties you are talking about?
Its a different matter whether there will be anymore tests or not but it is very clear that those tests need to be carried out…
Just live with the truth my friend that there will be no nuclear tests no matter what Santhanam or whoever says. π
“Whoever undertakes to set himself up as a judge of Truth and Knowledge is shipwrecked by the laughter of the gods.”
—–Albert Einstein
Navy orders 6 LCA
….snip….
Navy backs Tejas with Rs 900 cr
Business Standard has learnt that the navy has okayed the placement of an order for six Naval LCAs. At an approximate cost of Rs 150 crore per aircraft, that will provide a Rs 900 crore infusion into the Naval LCA programme.
That investment in the Tejas programme is rooted in the navyβs plan to operate both light and medium fighters off its aircraft carriers. The Naval LCA will supplement the heavier Russian MiG-29K, which has already been ordered from Russia. The Indigenous Aircraft Carrier (IAC), being built at Cochin Shipyard, Kochi, has been designed with a separate aircraft lift and maintenance facilities for the LCA, in addition to facilities for the MiG-29K. That has linked the development of the Naval LCA with the construction of the IAC, which is expected to join the fleet by 2014.
But the LCA programme faces a bottleneck in choosing a new engine. Two uprated engines β the General Electric GE-414 and the Eurojet EJ-200 β are currently being evaluated, but will be supplied only by 2013-14. And only with the new engine will the LCA have the power to get airborne from an aircraft carrier.
P S Subramaniam, the Director of the Aeronautical Development Agency, which coordinates the LCA programme, explains: βWe will fly the Naval LCA with the current GE-404 engine to test its flight characteristics, and whether its structural strength is sufficient for aircraft carrier operations. After the LCA is fitted with a new, more powerful engine we will take the next step of operating from an aircraft carrier.β
Meanwhile, a major shore-based test facility is coming up at INS Hansa, in Goa, which replicates an aircraft carrier deck on ground, complete with arrested recovery and a ski jump for take off. This facility, which is expected to be operational by October 2011, will be used for certifying the Naval LCA before actually flying off an aircraft carrier. This will also be used for pilotsβ training and for training maintenance crews.
150 Crore INR/ac = 31.25 mn USD /ac
It is scietnfically proven that you only need to have a certian sized willy to get the job done
And now its been revealed that we havent reached that certain size yet..
It is because with what we have we can kill millions of people and thats unacceptable damage worthy of detterence.
So I guess you’d say that a single 15 KT mounted on a single Agni I/II is sufficient aint it..because it could kill lots of people..and that would certainly qualify as “minimum”..
Not true but all this Nuclear Willy Waving is un-necessary
It will be unnecessary when 1)There will be no nuclear willy table(read : P5)
2)Our neighbours stop waving their willies at us.
we have our minimum deterrent against both our neighbors. And thats all we need.
WTF is a “minimum” deterrent?Either there is one or there isnt.And currently its not sufficient to deter our larger neighbour.
I am not concerned about the U.S relations.
Yeah..your avatar says it all though..
Testing now will be a blunder thats all. I told you we can and should test. Just bid for our time.
What you said was..
I am against further Nuclear tests till we have indigenous production capability of all our weapons and sub-systems.
Letme guess when that is going to happen….uhhh..NEVER!