dark light

ink

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 166 through 180 (of 1,597 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Pak-Fa news thread part 21 #2272986
    ink
    Participant

    That way we can get to hear from GarryB … Now that is someone who is missed !!

    Hear hear!

    in reply to: RuAF News and Development Thread part 10 #2272991
    ink
    Participant

    The Russian navy are getting Ka-62’s equipped with ASW equipment because the Ka-27+ are too heavy for Project 20380.

    Thanks spoky. Will those Ka-62s really be Ka-62s? In other words, if the Ka-62 is the civilian off-shoot of the Ka-60, will these naval Ka-62s be a re-militarised version of a civilian chopper? Will they have Russian engines? If so, which ones? In short, none of the news I’ve found out about this is very precise. Is the naval version in development? What will it be designated? Or is this just one of those bogus news stories that’s leaked out into the ether and become accepted as fact?

    EDIT: Just saw TR1’s post… is VK-2500 (or a derivative thereof) a contender?

    in reply to: RuAF News and Development Thread part 10 #2273899
    ink
    Participant

    Kamov and Russian Helicopters only mention the ’62 as a civilian helicopter (and needless to say Atlas Táxi Aéreo are getting civie birds) but if its true the RuAF and Navy are also interested does this mean there is a machine with Russian engines in the works too?

    EDIT: If there is a military version in the works (with or without domestic engines), what will this new version be called? Would it be too logical to call it a Ka-60 – perhaps with a fun suffix to show that it’s a newer more modern version, like Ka-60M.

    in reply to: RuAF News and Development Thread part 10 #2273925
    ink
    Participant

    As I understand it, Ka-62 is the Ka-60s civilian sister. But I was just looking at the Ka-60 wikipedia page (I know, I know…) and it said sales of the ’62 were planned for the Russian military. Should I be confused?

    in reply to: Serbian AF: Future Equipment #2343147
    ink
    Participant

    As I said before, unless some country literally gifts new jets to Serbia – there’s simply no way to afford them. Serbia has maxed out its credit cards and has no means of earning any significant new money.

    Most likely scenario, in my opinion, is that the AF high command continue to campaign for new jets but get nowhere for at least ten years.

    Second most likely scenario: Serbia leases a small number of MiG-29s from Russia on some sort of deferred payment scheme.

    in reply to: Serbian AF: Future Equipment #2344761
    ink
    Participant

    Serbian AF still pushing for new jets:


    Politika daily interviews AF chief (in Serbian)

    Speaking about the status and prospects of the aircraft “MiG-21” I emphasized that we need a procurement of new fighter aircraft. It is a process that is taking place in countries both in our immediate and wider environment. The need for procurement lies in the fact, on one hand that the resources of time aircraft “MiG-21” are at the very end, on the other hand we are obliged to preserve the ability to control and protect the sovereignty of its airspace, which is part of the European sky. It is unacceptable that today, in conditions of great expansion of air traffic and various forms of possible new threats to security in and out of airspace, to any part of the airspace in Europe is not fully under control. If we are unable to do that, it will take someone else, you certainly will not be free, and will have other negative consequences for safety.

    Frankly, I still can’t see any procurement happening for at least a decade. Not unless, as I said before, somebody comes along and gifts a squadron-worth of airframes to Serbia just for the fun of it.

    in reply to: Russian Navy Thread #2013923
    ink
    Participant

    Interesting article from DefenceWeb:

    Russia wants naval base in the Seychelles, Cuba or Vietnam

    in reply to: RuAF News and Development Thread 9 #2355201
    ink
    Participant

    Huh, NATO aircraft are all required to have imperial indicators?

    Ha! That would be funny, imagine the French reaction.

    in reply to: Italy's M-346 and Russia's Yak-130 thread #2355955
    ink
    Participant

    From RIA Novosti:

    Irkut plans Yak-130 sensor upgrade

    But on a more important note, when are we going to see a reasonable nickname for the ‘130? Doesn’t have to be an ASCC reporting name or anything, just something a bit better than “Yak-130”.

    My humble suggestion, “Yakizzo” from how Yak130 looks if you pretend its written using a combo of cyrillic and latin scripts.

    EDIT: ******! Should always remember to check my facts before posting – t’interweb tells me that the ASCC have assigned the “MITTEN” as the reporting name for the ‘130… so we can call off the search for a decent nickname.

    in reply to: RuAF News and Development Thread 9 #2358972
    ink
    Participant

    The latest Ka-62 helicopter with the touch screen glass cockpit technology

    So shiny!

    Othwerwise boring – like just about all other civvy helicopters

    in reply to: RuAF News and Development Thread 9 #2288692
    ink
    Participant

    One must wonder, if they are aiming high enough..

    Must one?

    The PAK-DA programme has already been around for quite some time and associated technology is already in development (I refer here to construction techniques, steath technology, on-board computing systems and avionics, sensors etc etc. ad nauseum).

    What’s more, I’m sure the time when the design bureaus would have feverishily dusted off concept designs was a few years ago – they will have progressed beyond that stage now.

    Engines are, of course, the key component – but my opinion is that eight years should be plenty of time. Unless they really are starting from scratch, right this minute.

    What I’m more concerned about is that the concept should be properly worked out so that the RuAF gets a proper bomber to replace the Bear (and, in time, the Blackjack) and not some medium range Su-34 on steroids.

    in reply to: RuAF News and Development Thread 9 #2289771
    ink
    Participant

    Sorry if this has been posted already.

    RIA Novosti report that Russia will receive its first indigenous strike UCAV in 2014

    in reply to: PLAN News Thread #4 #2015190
    ink
    Participant

    Here’s some interesting news from Reuters:

    China starts ‘combat ready’ patrols in disputed waters

    Its been a long time coming but China finally seems ready to flash a bit of military muscle over the Spratleys. Vietnam don’t look to be doing too much backing down either.

    in reply to: RuAF News and Development Thread 9 #2290374
    ink
    Participant

    Sorry, couldn’t find a separate PAK-DA thread. RIA Novosti report:

    PAK-DA takes shape – says RuAF commander

    in reply to: Military Aviation News-2012 #2290425
    ink
    Participant

    Serbian B92.net online news service reports that:

    Rosonboronexport offers MiG-29M/M2 to Serbia

    (news is in Serbian but more or less readable in google.translate)

Viewing 15 posts - 166 through 180 (of 1,597 total)