Unfortunately, that doesn’t make this news story any more true. I’m still waiting to see this reported, or more likely, denied by other news outlets.
I’m not sure the F-5 is really suitable – I imagine that Mexico has rather large territorial waters and the F-5 may be lacking in range and loiter time*.
* Especially if it is operating far from base.
As of right this moment Russia has far more nukes in service than the US, is building a class of SSBNs, and has two types of ICBMs in production. The US is producing neither ICBMs or SSBNs. Doesn’t take a genius to call a spade a spade.
It seems that, for Russian nuclear planning, the steady ICBM number is around 150, with more or less 90 Topol-M plus 60 RS-24. That means far less ICBM than US and a Russian land force around 700 nukes. So, to label “build-up” this current replacing trend is simply senseless.
Do you guys get your information from different sources by any chance? :rolleyes:
Also, don’t forget the JSF.
You forgot the FENCERs.
Who cares about all these “skiis” – I’m much more interested in whether Ka-62s are really being exported.
Berkut never actually used TVC…the intended AL-41 engines were earmarked for the MiG MFI program, so it flew with D30F6 variants without TVC. Close coupled engines were used on the MFI as well, so I don’t think TVC would have been affected. Same layout on the F-22A, and on the F/A-18 and F-15 TVC testbeds as well.
Sean,
I seem to have left out the word would somewhere in my sentence. If I’m not mistaken the Russians seem to thing that TVC works better when applied to well spaced engines. I wish I could remember where I read that – I’m at work now and so in no position to look for articles.
More than likely Top European and US Leaders have already seen it.
There is no reason to assume that – I imagine any testing will be carefully timed to avoid satellite overflights. Who knows whether Sukhoi have been infiltrated by assets who can get the information out? We don’t.
Personally I think that big fighter purchases would be a mistake for Iran. The USAF may not be able to get them while they’re on the ground in the first five minutes of an attack but it will wear them down eventually. With SAMs the situation is a little different. During Allied Force SAMs were able to maintain a threat to NATO assets throughout the conflict – some believe (though not me) that this is what forced NATO to target Serbia’s economic infrastructure rather than deployed forces (basically almost all VJ forces could be considered as deployed during this air campaign).
On the other hand, if Iran could somehow magically introduce a large, modern fighter force into its airforce overnight (which of course it can’t) this would be a useful deterrent to any potential airstrikes. Clearly, however, it would take Iran years to build up a large enough fighter force and train pilots on the new machines.
Wasn’t one of the problems with the Berkut fuselage the fact that the engines were placed too close together? I seem to remember reading somewhere that this adversely affected TVC.
Whatever happened to that Nigerian order?
Now this is just speculative but….
I was thinking about WIG aircraft and came to the conclusion that their military applications, however potentially useful, are limited and questionable. But it did occur to me that they could be extremely useful for maritime trade being that, if build large enough, they could transport very large loads (exceeding even the An-225) across large distances at (almost aircraft like) speed. This would constitute a revolution for maritime trade being that it could cut transport times without increasing costs – at least it could be less expensive than air transport. The only drawback is the massive investement that is needed to start the process: Large, costly and risky WIG aircraft need to be designed, built and tested and port facilities need to be adapted. This would cost billions.
So, I was thinking, this process is only useful for countries that conduct massive volumes of trade across large expanses of water. The following combinations come to mind, China+US, UK/EU+US… Anybody want to add some more?
Another problem here is that Russia is currently, I think undeniably, the world leader in the construction and design of large WIG aircraft so any project would have to involve Russia. If they were clever they could cooperate with the US and China to create a network (perhaps consisting of only two or three port to begin with) of WIG ports across the Pacific. They could also, potentially, come to some sort of agreement with these two countries to jointly develop very large transport WIGs that would ‘sail’ between these ports speedily carrying large volumes of cargo.
Whadya’ think?
Hello!
Some 3D images of the “supposed” Sukhoi T-50 PAK FA used for studies of RCS. This model is very similar to the plane published by NPO Saturn…
Bichito,
My work computer won’t let me see the full-size images – what do the graphs show?
Now that we’re onto the subject of Russian tactical bombers (sorry – cheeky off-topic question coming) – whats the status of the FENCER upgrades? Any news? Seriously, whats going on with that?
Jezza,
Its a dumb statement – I don’t think anybody is going to try to back it up or refute it.