dark light

ink

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,021 through 1,035 (of 1,597 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: UK military plane crashes in Iraq #2659942
    ink
    Participant

    I must admitt that I too am curious to know “what the plane was doing ” and how and why it crashed. I’m just curious – sorry if that makes me the enemy too. My enemy curiousity wonders whether the Herc was shot down (an would be even more interested if it knew that a Herc was shot down by an anti-tank missile). My enemy curiosity would also be fascinated if it turned out to be true that the Herc was on a special mission. I may be the enemy for being curious about those things because I’m not supposed to be curious – I’m just supposed to shut up and silently respect the families of those involved.
    But ask yourself this: If a Chinese Mi-17 was downed by Tibetans throwing rocks – wouldn’t you be curious? Or maybe you’d just post a short message about how those poor Chinese airmen have families and how our thoughts should be with them.

    ink
    Participant

    Yea but try flying an F-18 nap of the earth at high speed and when the pilots eye-balls pop out onto his lap you’ll realise why Su-24, F-111 and Tornado all have swing-wings.

    in reply to: Iranian Kh-55 #2049956
    ink
    Participant

    I’m guessing that the Kh-55s were sold minus the warhead – otherwise that means (assuming the report is true) Iran has nuclear weapons. That could lead to some interesting developments in world politics.

    ink
    Participant

    Perhaps it was my memory playing tricks on me after all… So SSMs eh? Any word on how effective this approach was? Or perhaps it was a sabre-rattling move.

    in reply to: UK military plane crashes in Iraq #2661664
    ink
    Participant

    I’m afraid that logic is just plain stupid. During the ’99 air campaign against Yugoslavia this forum, and the world’s media, went mad with all kinds of speculation – nobody even considerred stopping the speculation because Serbs who had families over there might hear and be upset. During Operation Iraqi Freedom – same thing – even though lots of posters had friends or family in the services or were Iraqi etc.
    So this is an accident involving an aircraft and we’re discussing it on an aviation forum – how can that be disrespectful? Furthermore, nobody has even suggested that it might be due to pilot error (which is, frankly, the only disrespect you might be able to possibly show in a situation like this).

    Finally, I have one question:
    Everytime there is any significant air-attrition this forum discusses it immediately (be it an Indian MiG-21 or a Russian chopper in Chechnya) – have you ever felt that perhaps we should avoid talking about those events out of respect as well or is this just because its a British accident and its “our boys” and their families this time?

    ink
    Participant

    Sounds like a benificial tade for everyone involved, and will help cement Israel-Turkish relations further.

    Also, it shows that Israel can get along with an Islamic neighbour, despite what some misguided few on both sides say. Peace out everyone.

    Turkey, a NATO member, close ally of the US (with a sprinkling of recent disagreements) and soon to be on the track to EU membership… not to mention the fact that Turkey has been a secular state for some time now. All of these facts discourage the view that this can be reflective of the Israeli state attitude towards ‘Islamic’ states.

    ink
    Participant

    I know this will be off topic (or at least semi off topic) but does anyone remember, or have reports about, an Iranian air attack on Iraq pre-Operation Iraqi Freedom. I used to have a news report on it but I’ve either allowed it to stagnate on my other computer or its backed up on a CD somewhere and I’m too lazy to look for it. If my memory serves me right the Iranians attacked targets near Baghdad with their Su-24s in 2001 – now I can’t remember the details so I don’t know what the targets were but I definitely remember something like this going down… Looks like we really do need Mr Cooper to comment on this thread.
    If I’m wrong about this or it was just a rumour I promise to feel particularly stupid about this post.

    in reply to: Why are the decks of Soviet/Russian ships red? #2061463
    ink
    Participant

    Maybe they were a different colour before they became rusty?

    in reply to: Russia reveals lightweight version of NO11M Bars radar #2606796
    ink
    Participant

    I read that IN wanted to fit Bars on its K’s.

    If thats true I can’t see any reason why the Russians wouldn’t offer it, especially if they’re offering it on other MiG varriants. My suggestion is that what you read is inaccurate – unless its Jane’s that got it wrong at the end of that article.

    in reply to: Russia reveals lightweight version of NO11M Bars radar #2606797
    ink
    Participant

    I read that IN wanted to fit Bars on its K’s.

    If thats true I can’t see any reason why the Russians wouldn’t offer it, especially if they’re offering it on other MiG varriants. My suggestion is that what you read is inaccurate – unless its Jane’s that got it wrong at the end of that article.

    in reply to: The Dhruv thread #2606799
    ink
    Participant

    Sorry harry, I must have missed your post… I think my brain must have switched off after all the pointless bickering.

    in reply to: The Dhruv thread #2606801
    ink
    Participant

    Sorry harry, I must have missed your post… I think my brain must have switched off after all the pointless bickering.

    in reply to: Russia reveals lightweight version of NO11M Bars radar #2606900
    ink
    Participant

    Presumably there are no plans to instal the Bars radar on the K’s because the IN won’t pay for them or don’t deem them necessary – I hardly think the Russians would take a decision like that. These days they’ll fit anything onto anything else if it’ll sell.

    in reply to: Russia to sell Strategic Bombers to China #2606906
    ink
    Participant

    Well maybe because the only bomber they’re operating at the moment is a fifty-year-old design? Thats a thirty year leap – not bad in my opinion.

    Actually crobato is the only one with credible answers as to why the Chinese won’t buy Tu-22M3s. Calling them out-dated or trash is just plain wrong. In terms of performance they’re way ahead of anything the Chinese operate and they’ve got plenty of room for improvement too.

    in reply to: The Dhruv thread #2606927
    ink
    Participant

    I took a look at the HAL website earier, specifically to check out what they have on the ALH, and found quite a lot of info about it. The thing that disappointed me though is the lack of info on the army version. Anyone know how far along that is? Any idea if there’s been a prototype? What are the avionics like? What ATGMs is it going to carry?

    What does a guy have to do (and what kind of cr@p does he have to wade through) around here to get some answers to pretty basic questions???

Viewing 15 posts - 1,021 through 1,035 (of 1,597 total)