[ATTACH=CONFIG]224646[/ATTACH]
Forgot one then here is
The Q-5J is also capable to do a2g attack. The roll for this J version is more alike SAAB A-32 or Alphajet with powerful payload.

Its quite nice-looking but too old to be modern combat aircraft.
1) According to the Beijing Aviation Exhibition this year, the weapon load of JH-7A up to 10 tons, this figure is more reasonable for the size of JH-7.
2) The point shall be focused not is its profile but its powerplant, if AL-31 be installed, the specification of JH-7 will be much greater than equivalent.
3) If we talk about aerodynemics, then JH-‘s inlet should be redesigned, Why V-G inlet didn’t be used I wonder.
Mirage F-1 also called Mirage IIIF.
MiG-23 series significantly heavier than Mirage III/5/50 even Mirage IIIF and Mirage IIING. MiG-23 also powered over 10 ton thrust compare to Mirage III series never beyond 8 ton until some Mirage IIIF retrofitted by RD-33.
Only armaments their are similar.
The Video presented Barrel Roll, Pugachev’s Cobra, Helicopter Spin and Vectory Roll.
more sexy one[ATTACH=CONFIG]220292[/ATTACH]
The diameters of wheel won’t be same as engine nacelle, otherwise, the wheel packed inside of undercarrige should be an angle like this:
[ATTACH=CONFIG]217923[/ATTACH]
Bugatti 100P (’30ies design). There’s a project to make it fly (as it was near completed in 1939), well at least a replica, donator’s welcome.
This is a really beautiful aircraft, however, rest of them turns to negative direction.
I don’t get it. Slipper doesn’t mean it so simply I think. Perhaps he saw a pylon with side- launch rail like which has been mounted under MiG-23’e belly or something like F-15 usually fitted.
Thanks to GJ Flanker from http://www.mycity-military.com/Avioni/T-50-novi-ruski-lovac_475.html for the video
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IfG0dr8cPRU
Can someone translate what they’re saying?
I don’t read Russian, but according to video, it clearly is that PAKFA was testing spin maneuver.
Su-35 – 2000 L 😉
Which not means that 3000L PTB will not be suitable for Su-27/35BM
[ATTACH=CONFIG]217568[/ATTACH]
From the foto above, you can see that 2200L DT which under F-22’s wing is relatively smaller compare to F-15’s wing
Too heavy to be loaded by PAK-FA but not to be carried by Su-27/35/34?
[ATTACH=CONFIG]217567[/ATTACH]
Sufficient space under wing for 3000L according to foto comparision
DT 2000 L & 3000 L
[ATTACH=CONFIG]217500[/ATTACH]
Well, I didn’t see the case why DT under PAKFA’s wing will not be 3000L.
Sorry, my misunderstanding, I didn’t check your drawing of scale in the latest thread
forum.keypublishing.com/showthread.php?121995-Pak-Fa-News-Thread-part-22/page22
But according to the newest photo relaesed, the external fuel tanks under Su-34’s belly is as well as which under Su-24’s wing, ergo, that is 3000L.
BTW, if the data contributed by this link is true, then I doubt that Ð Ð’Ð’-БД – AA-X-13 ARROW could be carried internally by PAKFA.