Is this a bad time to remind everyone that the ‘Great’ in Gt Britain doesn’t actually refer to ‘greatness’ but rather to its greater size/area compared to Brittany?
It is? I’ll get my coat then. In seriousness, I’m sure Elly and crew are looking into the specifics of the situation. They need us to write the letters, make the calls, and generally make nuisances of ourselves to those that can make the difference.
is that a good thing?
I think so, I loved those falling cartridge cases they added in to one shot in DBW.
I’ve been known to commence the occasional grossly misproportioned Spitfire in my margin, and they never get any better. And that’s with a ‘life model’ zooming about outside. It’s those wings…
No problem, I didn’t mean to come across as frowning on the asking. I know the aviation museum and collection world has grown on a different path to other museum disciplines and that by necessity things have been done in a different way. Swaps, purchases etc with the public can be made where they are not accessioned items. I was thinking really that it’s perhaps as well to respect the position taken by museums in general (ie no sales!) in seeking parts for restorations/private collection as it saves everyone trouble.
as long as they are behind the instrument glass i understand they are relatively safe – BUT if the glass is cracked and the paint is flaky can cause probs…
Handle them carefully and keep em behind glass!
Cracked glass and flaky paint are indeed visual cues that if you hang on to the object you have every change of becoming a candidate for the Darwin Awards, but the glass does not protect you from the emitted radiation. Best to ask the experts (see below). You absolutely must do so if the item is an open source (the aforementioned missing or cracked glass).
National Radiological Protection Board
Chilton
Didcot
Oxon
OX11 0RQ
Telephone: 01235 831600
Fax: 01235 833891
http://www.nrpb.org/ (A great deal of information to be found here)
Society for Radiological Protection
76 Portland Place
London
W1B 1NT
Telephone: 01364 644487
Fax: 01364 644492
Email: [email]admin@srp-uk.org[/email]
Radiation Protection Special Interest Group
http://www.ipem.org.uk/sigs/rpsig/radprot.html
The Environment Agency (re disposal)
Telephone: 08708 506 506
http://www.environment-agency.gov.uk
Yes I do have some good advice,
Scream inside with frustration, recognise that they dont let stuff go no matter what you offer for it, draw a line under your quest in that direction and look elsewhere.
I can tell a similar story…
Happy hunting.
HP
Definitely a case of the wrong tree to bark up there. Any museum, particularly a National museum, that sold any of its collection to the general public would be breaking the public trust as well as numerous ethical guidelines.
Best to get them checked out with a Geiger counter.
Sorry, my mistake. The point stands though; let them know what you think. You can complain to us lot all day long, and nothing will change for the better. At the least you will receive an official reason for each problem you highlight, and at best a change will be effected. The reality will be somewhere in between of course, but surely if its worth the effort to highlight here, it’s worth actually calling RAFM about? Or writing a letter?
To deny access to the BoB museum is DISGUSTING, hope you complained Anna
Anna states in the first post that this was for filming to take place. Unless you would suggest the museum not accept film crews and thereby deny a source of funding and PR, this must simply be put down to bad luck. I find a call in advance avoids disappointment in any museum visit.
That may well be the case in a lot of museums, but in regard to the exhibits it’s at odds with museums being accountable and accessible. A registered/accredited museum should be able to provide details on any item in their collection, including photographs. The only info that may be withheld pertains to the people it was acquired from, and if in store, its precise location and associated security measures. In short, avoiding people capturing the layout and security measures of galleries and stores is a valid reason, withholding information on exhibits and stored objects is most definitely not. Of course, staff time is another issue, which is why said museum can legitimately request notice and a good reason for providing access to normally inaccessible objects, including for photography purposes.
Get rid of plastic crap!!! Anna 😉
I’m not sure of your particular complaint, but perhaps some sort of industrial solvent/Ex-Lax mixture would help?
You are now entering…The Emoticon Zone…
Here’s what’s on at IWML: http://london.iwm.org.uk/ in case any of the temporary exhibitions take your fancy. I may be biased, but I think it’s worth the visit for the veteran Camel and Spit MkIa. And the Holocaust exhibition of course 🙁
It’s unfortunate there’s no-one from RAFM present to address your concerns. Have you called, written, or emailed them about this?
I hear you, but it really shouldn’t be any more ‘special’ simply because of the connection with servicemen/women. If museums look after every last thing to the same standards, there can be no situation in which they are forced to prepare the guest room for Mr Cockup…
The National Trust thing is interesting, but with the concept of ‘access for all’ there’s only so much you can do. Even on a basic level people need to find their way to things, and even in the days of hardcopy museum catalogues (and nowt else) you have situations during/after the Middle East conflicts where thieves use the museum guide book to target the most valuable artefacts.