dark light

fightingirish

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 991 through 1,005 (of 1,043 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Mikoyan MFI = MiG-37 ???!!??? #2654994
    fightingirish
    Participant

    Was the Mig-28 also an export designation of the Mig-23 or Mig-27 ?
    Remember reading about it!!!

    fightingirish

    fightingirish
    Participant

    From Flight Daily News:

    Surprise’ attic space helps 747 Advanced take shape

    Boeing is revealing first details of dramatic interior changes to the 747 Advanced which, together with 7E7 engine technology, could provide the foundation for the launch of the first long-awaited stretch of the model, in around two years time.
    The studies form key parts of the 747 Advanced project which is aimed at boosting seating to 450 and increasing range to 8,000nm (15,000km). This aims it squarely at what Boeing sees as a “200 seat gap” in the market between the competing Airbus A340-600 and A380-800, and provides today’s 747 operators with a platform for future growth.

    Although Boeing maintains that it has no interest in competing directly with the Airbus behemoth, having abandoned an earlier stretch study in 1997 dubbed the 747-600X, it admits that the emergence of the A380 is opening up a potential market opportunity.

    “A lot of customers are not interested in moving up to the A380, and there are still a lot of people in a ‘wait and see’ mode,” says Boeing product marketing director Brad Till. “We fundamentally see a much smaller market for an aircraft larger than the 747, and we don’t see a business case for that makes sense for an all-new aircraft.

    “But we think using the 7E7 technology provides a good approach. The market certainly is interested in a 400-450 seat aircraft, but we’ve got to make sure it makes sense. We think this does.”

    Although Boeing originally announced details of its initial 747 Advanced plans in 2003, the interior design plans represent a fresh initiative.

    The new interior studies build on the innovative upper lobe crew rest designs created in recent years for the 777 and 747-400. Boeing is now extending these to create a series of ‘Sky Suites’ for passengers which could run for virtually the entire length of the stretched 747’s main fuselage aft of the ‘hump’.

    Accommodation

    Using previously unused space in the ‘attic’ area above the main deck cabin ceiling, the suites provide so much new accommodation space that it has shocked the study team. “We have amazed ourselves at what we’ve been able to do with the space,” says Boeing interior configuration lead Richard Johnson.

    By moving ducting and wiring aside, Boeing has created a series of suites connected by a passageway with a 1.88m (74in) tall stand-up space, reducing to 1.82m under frames. With individual, curtained off bunk spaces on either side of the passageway, the ‘Pullman’ railway coach-like atmosphere of the Sky Suites is reinforced with the creation of meeting rooms and rest areas.

    Built over the ‘monuments’ or galleys on the main deck, the meeting room zones are wider and provide flat floor over a cross-section similar to that of the average regional jet.

    Space is potentially available for 20-40 upper berths, depending on the size of the bunk cubicles and the number of meeting or business room suites. The favoured size appears to be 1.5m wide, though 1m and 2m wide units have been designed, says Johnson who adds various artificial lighting concepts are also being evaluated.

    The spaces would be sold for premium prices to passengers who would occupy economy seats on the main deck by Door 4 for take-off and landing.

    Further forward, Boeing has also conceived an entirely new upper deck stairway and entryway by Door 2 which creates a previously unknown feeling of spaciousness in the 747.

    In place of the current fore and aft stairway on the port inner side of the main deck, the Advanced design incorporates an open atrium area with a wide, sweeping stairway on the starboard inner side. For the first time on the 747, the upper deck floor is opened up to the crown to enhance the ‘openness’ of the stairway area, with extra windows added to the upper deck window belt as well as additional ‘skylight’ windows added to the crown of the aircraft itself.

    The passenger version of the Advanced would be stretched by inserting two plugs – a 2.03m stretch in the forward double-deck section and a 1.53m plug by the trailing edge of the wing. The stretched freighter would also have the same aft stretch, but would incorporate a slightly longer 3.56m stretch in the forward fuselage just aft of the hump.

    These changes would take the overall length of the 747 Advanced Freighter to 75.8m against the 70.6m of the current model – making it the largest of the proposed derivative models should it get the go-ahead, possibly as early as 2006.

    Added to the improved economics of the 7E7 engines, Boeing is confident the innovative Sky Suites concept, revised interior and other flight deck and aerodynamic modifications planned for the Advanced will make the new 747 an attractive option to carriers still needing growth but not ready to step up to the A380.

    If the plan sells, airlines could be offering ‘Sky Suites’ from around 2010 onwards.”

    A sweeping stairway to the upper deck is part of the interior design revamp.

    http://www.flightdailynews.com/farnborough2004/07_19/images/airtransport/747b.jpg

    fightingirish

    fightingirish
    Participant

    You remember Executive Decision starring Kurt Russel, Seven Seagal (only 20 mins 😡 ) and Halle Berry? There is a lot of space over the cabin.
    It’s time now for Boeing to use up that space!

    fightingirish

    fightingirish
    Participant

    747 ADV

    From Flug Revue September 2004 :

    BOEING STUDIES 747 ADVANCED
    By Sebastian Steinke

    The good old Boeing 747 is having a tough time these days: on the one hand, the A380 threatens to upstage it as the biggest civil aircraft in the world, while on the other hand rivals that were originally smaller than the jumbo are also poaching customers in what was once the undisputed territory of the double-decker giant from Seattle. Apart from the A380, two other contenders are the A340-600, with its high cargo capacity, and the 777-300ER, which may have only two engines but is constantly being improved.

    But Alan Mullaly, President and CEO, Boeing Commercial Airplanes, is confident that the time to cease production of the tried and tested four-jet aircraft has not yet arrived. “The Boeing 777 will gradually replace the older versions of the 747, that is, the -100, -200 and -300, as it offers the same seat mile costs. In the past 747’s were often purchased purely because of their range, without the capacity really being needed. One day the 777 will even replace all the 747’s. But the 747-400 will stay around for many years to come, and we will continue to improve it. We plan to make a decision about the 747 over the next year.”

    To significantly improve the time-tested 747 a second time will be no simple matter: the present highly successful -400 version, which has won 659 orders so far, is the product of a major update programme carried out by the manufacturer at the end of the 1980s and aimed at modernising the jumbo basic design, which dated from the 1960s. This entailed the installation of modern engines, a two-man cockpit and improved aerodynamics. Significantly more elaborate plans that would have entailed lengthening the 747 into an A380 competitor and would have required an entirely new wing had to be shelved despite several initiatives, due to lack of interest on the part of the airlines.

    Today Boeing is following a different approach with the further development of the 747, as Brad Till, regional director of product marketing for the 747, explained in an interview with FLUG REVUE in Seattle. “We do not see any market in the size of the 747 that would justify developing a completely new aircraft. No one wants an 800-seater. Instead, we are planning a series of improvements that will not cost hundreds of thousands of engineer-hours, but will still bring a lot of benefit.”

    The 747 Advanced could carry 34 passengers and two freight pallets more than a 747-400 and also satisfy the stringent QC2 take-off noise restrictions around London Heathrow. Its 1,370km extra range would permit non-stop flights from Frankfurt to Buenos Aires, from Hong Kong to New York or from Sydney to Dallas.

    Riding on the back of technology developed for the 7E7, the 3.6m longer 747 Advanced could benefit from the fuel-saving engines on the new twin-jet, albeit in a variant with bleed air that has still to be developed. According to Boeing’s calculations, the 747 Advanced would need 15 percent less kerosene per seat than a 747-400 and 14 percent less than an A380 over a distance of 11,000km. Till is critical of the way that the empty weight of its rival, the A380, has risen during development. “Compared with a 747-400, the A380 is about 57 percent heavier per seat.” According to Boeing, the trip cost of a 747 Advanced (450 passengers) will be 19 percent less than that of an A380 (542 passengers) over a 5,000km distance, and the seat mile costs will also be three percent better than those of its larger European rival, which is already designed for future growth.

    New materials, such as aluminium alloys and composite materials, will make the 747 Advanced lighter, and its cockpit will resemble those of the 7E7 and 777, allowing standard pilot training as for a family of aircraft. The 747 Advanced will inherit the undercarriage, tyres and brakes of the 777, while its electronically wired (“e-enabled”) cabin with internet access over a satellite antenna will come from the 7E7.

    The Boeing engineers have come up with an extra trump card for future versions of the 747: they propose to utilise the “attic” space that is currently wasted to the rear of the upper deck bulge, above the main deck. Here one could accommodate up to 40 “Sky Suites” or “Skybunks”. Passengers would be able to move to these triangular-shaped sitting and sleeping compartments from their normal seats in the main deck directly after take-off, climbing up a small, separate staircase in the rear cabin area. FLUG REVUE was allowed to visit a full-size cabin mock-up of the area. As an alternative to the hotel-room like, larger Sky Suites which were also presented, Boeing expects even greater customer interest for the somewhat more modest, but still very comfortable Skybunks.

    The individual compartments, either curtained off or fitted with sliding doors, branch off on either side of a central aisle above the main deck, with sufficient headroom available for FLUG REVUE’s 1.9m tall journalist to stand upright. Here one could sit either with one’s feet up and watch television on a large screen or surf or work unobserved on a computer, or else one could sleep in a diagonal position on a full-length bed. It is not possible to install any windows in the Skybunks, as they are surrounded by countless airducts and cables. A separate lounge area with bar plus a spacious toilet in the “small upper deck” complete the comfortable optional extras available for a surcharge on the ticket price. Alternatively, storage areas for food trolleys or office compartments could be installed above the rear main deck.

    The new fixtures would not alter the present bulge of the jumbo with its upper deck area, but Boeing has changed its layout. From the entrance in the main deck, passengers will now be able to climb to the upper deck via an imposing curved staircase. In this respect the 747 Advanced copies the impressive spaciousness of the A380 entrance. The Americans are also proposing to have a kind of porter’s lodge by door two, which could be used as a sound-proof office cabin during the cruise if a concierge was no longer required after boarding. Finally, the new design package features LED lighting and reshaping of the cabins. In particular, the complicated cabling for in-flight entertainment and on-board internet access, which is relatively costly to retrofit, should get many airlines thinking about their next jumbo.

    Whereas Boeing would like to stimulate demand for the new 747 through the gradual conversion into special freighters of today’s large stock of around 1,400 jumbo jets, in Chicago they are also thinking about an entirely new Advanced Freighter. This would be stretched even further than the passenger version, by 5.1m, and would have a maximum take-off weight of 422 tonnes. With 130 tonnes of cargo on board, the Advanced Freighter would have a range of 8,260km. An extra four pallets could be accommodated in the main deck, with two extra containers and two pallets in the lower deck. According to Boeing, the engines, cockpit and materials for the product development study resemble the passenger version. Both Advanced jumbos would have a modified wing with reinforced structure, larger tanks and the raked wingtips which are already familiar from the 767-400. Provided that sufficient airline interest can be generated, the two new jumbo versions could be available by the end of the decade.

    From page 28 of FLUG REVEU 9/2004

    One pic shows the smaller upper deck, it looks just like this, but remind, it is from the Boeing 763-246C as shown on Aerospaceweb.org :

    http://www.aerospaceweb.org/question/design/airliners/b763int.gif

    fightingirish

    fightingirish
    Participant

    HeloJet

    This chopper looks very similar to the one in the move “The 6th Day” starring Arnold Schwarzenegger….

    Yes, it’s from the movie “The 6th Day”.

    I have that pic since 2 years on my PC. While searching for it, I remember reading the “HeloJet” or “WhisperJet”was a down-civilised version. You can see at the chin of Chopper the round turret, which could hould a FLIR or gun in the Army version.

    Here some more pic’s from the movie:

    fightingirish

    in reply to: Japan to stop buying F-2 #2650784
    fightingirish
    Participant

    Yes, the F-15E is selling well in Asia. After F-15K in Korea and maybe the F-15T in Malaysia, we might see the F-15N (N for Nippon, not NAVY).

    If one seater, the airframe could be based on the F-15F proposed to Germany during the 90’s.

    fightingirish

    in reply to: New Mikoyan light fighter info #2661329
    fightingirish
    Participant

    Why after working on the Mig 1.4X airframes would they go back to the Mig-29 9.1X airframes ? It makes very little sence.

    Yeah,
    I presume, the new aircraft should look like a Mig 1.44, maybe then only one engine and TVC.
    Just like a JSFsski !!! 😀

    fightingirish

    in reply to: New Mikoyan light fighter info #2661351
    fightingirish
    Participant

    “MiG-33” and Yak-43

    From “MiG-33” and Yak-43 thread :

    The Mikoyan 33 project was for a simpler, cheaper fighter than the MiG-29 with more of an air-to-ground mission.

    It didn’t get very far.

    The Chengdu FC-1 is based on the Mig-33.

    fightingirish

    in reply to: Which WWII aviator/s would you make a film about? #1828892
    fightingirish
    Participant

    German pilots

    Adolf Galland – he lived long after the war and became one of the most powerful men in the Luftwaffe during the war. He knew what was needed, but was at loggerheads with Hitler.

    Nein
    , 2 weeks ago I was talking to Joseph Brock at a Air festival in Hamm, Germany. He was a Luftwaffe pilot in WW2 and a manufacture pilot for Messerschmidt.
    He knew Adolf Galland, but he did not like him! Joseph Brock was a NCO, who didn’t want to become an officer.
    He did’t want to have “Halsschmerzen (sore throat)” 😀
    Halsschmerzen (sore throat) means , he didn’t want start a carreer as an officer and to get then the “Ritterkreuz” (knight cross – around his throat) from Hitler.

    Many pilots didn’t like Galland. Galland was a noble snob and part of the Nazi system. I agree, he also had differences with Goring and Hilter, for example during the Battle of Britian, when Göring asked pilots, what they do need to win, he, Göring would get it immediatelly! Galland answered: ” A few Spitfeuers (Spitfires), Sir!”. He got sacked as the Generel of the Luftwaffe over Me 262.

    If you want to make a movie in Germany about a german pilot in WW2, he just not have to be a sucessfull pilot or have an interesting C.V., he must also have done something honourable, like rescued Jew’s from the KZ’s or fought against Hitler/Nazi system like the officers from “20th July 1944”.

    Pilots like Udet or Steinhoff are not known outside Germany.

    Why not a female pilot like Beinhorn or Beate Uhse 😀 ???

    Back to Joseph Brock:
    After WW2 he flew F-86 in the USAFE and as a manufacture pilot for Dassault. Last jet he flew was a Mirage III. He was also a stunt-pilot, a press reporter and he helped a swiss museum to rebuild a Dewoitine D 520. Today he lives in Switzerland or in the Bretange, France and writes books.
    One book, ” Nachtflug ins Ungewisse” is written like Ken Follets WW2 books.

    Again, Nazi Germany and their pilots lost WW2, so who wants to make a movie about losers! Would the British make a movie about losing in penalty kick??? 😀 :rolleyes:

    fightingirish

    in reply to: Canada selects the Sikorsky H-92 #2661541
    fightingirish
    Participant

    VXX Presidential Airlift replacement program

    From the thread H-92 Superhawk :

    Date:20th June 2003 18:46

    […]
    it’s currently competing for the USMC VXX Presidential Airlift replacement program…it’s only competitor is the US-101 (EH-101)…and this appears to be the best opportunity for its first military sale. The winner will have a leg-up in also securing the USAF SAR helicopter replacement for over 100 aircraft.

    fightingirish

    in reply to: Canada selects the Sikorsky H-92 #2662153
    fightingirish
    Participant

    From Sikorsky homepage :

    The Maritime Helicopter Team Selected to Replace Sea Kings

    Jul. 23, 2004
    – Ottawa — The Government of Canada today announced the selection of the Sikorsky Aircraft-led Maritime Helicopter Team to replace Sea King helicopters currently in service with the Canadian Forces.

    The selection was made as part of Canada’s $3-billion Maritime Helicopter Project (MHP) for the acquisition of 28 aircraft. The Maritime Helicopter Team will furnish the Sikorsky H-92 SUPERHAWK medium-lift helicopter and support services over the next 20 years. The first helicopter will be delivered in 2008.

    Canada’s new H-92s will be multi-mission capable and will perform anti-submarine patrols, surveillance and ship-borne duties, and a wide range of utility roles such as Search and Rescue support, cargo and personnel transport, and disaster relief support.

    “Sikorsky has been a part of Canada’s history for more than 50 years, and we are proud to continue this legacy,” said Sikorsky President Steve Finger. “The MHP specifications are rightfully among the most demanding in the world. There is no better aircraft to fulfill these missions than the H-92.”

    Sikorsky Aircraft has reiterated its long-term commitment to Canada by joining with two leading Canadian companies to form The Maritime Helicopter Team. General Dynamics Canada, based in Ottawa, Ontario, is responsible for the H-92 systems integration and will furnish a 100 percent Canadian-developed and built Mission Data Management System. L-3 MAS Canada, based in Mirabel, Quebec, brings proven performance in long-term in-service support for the Canadian Forces.

    “General Dynamics Canada has been serving our Armed Forces since 1948, and we have consistently proven our capability to successfully complete large, technically complex projects,” said GD Canada’s President John Watts. “Our team of qualified and dedicated workers are eager to provide the H-92 with a world-class Integrated Mission System. We will draw on the extensive systems integration experience we have gained over the years to ensure the success of the MHP programme.”

    Sylvain Bédard, President of L-3 Communications MAS Canada added: “We are pleased with the selection of the MHT which will provide the Canadian Forces with the next generation maritime helicopter. Our Sikorsky-led team recognizes the advantages of the safety and reliability inherent in the H-92 design and capitalizes on the strength of the Canadian industry partners–GD Canada providing the mission suite and L-3 MAS with the leading role for the provision of in-service support.

    “This selection continues the long-standing L-3 MAS tradition as the leading provider of quality, responsive and innovative solutions in support of the Canadian Air Force operational requirements.”

    The Sikorsky H-92 Maritime Helicopter Team was selected over the AgustaWestland team and its EH-101 Cormorant offering. A Lockheed Martin/NH Industries consortium NH-90 proposal was eliminated earlier this year.

    The H-92 flies faster, farther, is safer, carries more and costs less to operate than its MHP competitor. It builds on the heritage of five million flight hours achieved through the Sea Stallion, SEAHAWK and BLACK HAWK aircraft, and the Sikorsky Sea King that has served the Canadian Forces for more than four decades.

    Breaking new ground for medium-weight helicopters, the H-92 provides unprecedented levels of safety and reliability. It is the only rotorcraft in the world certified to the latest FAA, EASA and JAA safety regulations and is designed to the latest specifications for flaw tolerance, bird strike capability and turbine burst protection.

    I thought, a EH-101 flies farther and carries more !!! :confused:

    fightingirish

    in reply to: Some Farnborough pics #2663508
    fightingirish
    Participant

    UCAV AAR

    Hi folks,

    from Aviation International News :

    The X-45C and X-47B will both weigh about 18,000 pounds empty, carry a 4,500-pound payload, fly to 40,000 feet and reach about Mach 0.8. Apart from stealth, the biggest design challenge in the air vehicles may be for the engine providers: how to ensure that enough lubricants are provided for two-day mission. DARPA has even asked the two prime contractors to demonstrate aeriel refueling–from a KC-135

    fightingirish

    in reply to: Some Farnborough pics #2664004
    fightingirish
    Participant

    Air Refueling of a UAV / UCAV

    Could the Navy X-47B be refueled in their air???

    I know, the Navy and most Nato counterparts uses the a hose reel and “basket” refueling system and the USAF the “flying boom” system.
    I presume, it is much difficult to refuel a UAV / UCAV with Navy/Nato system than with the USAF system. The pilot of the aircraft, which is being refueled, is in charge with the Navy/Nato system. The “flying boom”- operator on the refueling aircraft (KC-135/ KC-10) is in charge with the USAF system.
    And while a Navy UAV / UCAV is uninhabited, who would be in charge?
    The flight controller on ground or on a CVN ???
    I don’t know any UAV / UCAV refueling studies done for both systems.

    fightingirish

    in reply to: TV alert (German ARD) #635403
    fightingirish
    Participant

    Jagd an der Startbahn

    Hi folks, especially “spotters”,

    just saw “Jagd an der Startbahn (Hunt at the runway)” on ARD.
    The report about “spotters” was very good.
    It started with Mr.Christoph Rogosz and his son on their way from Dresden to Zürich.
    They caught a B744 from Thai Airway with the dragon boat painted on the sides. (Reg: HS-TGB ???). The son wants to become a pilot one day.
    An old man 79 years old, who faught in WW2, was taking some pic’s at Frankfurt. He complained about high security since 9/11. But at Zurich, Mr. Rogosz showed holes in the fences, so spotters can put the lens through.
    Well, that is service !!!
    Zürich seems to be Mekka for spotters!!!

    A spotter (Helmut Bierbaum???), normally a Co-pilot by LH, who is allowed to pass security, shot some fotos at Hamburg Fuhlsbüttel . He caught a A343 from Gulf Air with a new colours and german reg.. He was also allowed to foto Boeing’s first BBJ from inside. The BBJ came from Genf to Hamburg for some minor repairs.

    A 767 Co-pilot at LTU takes pictures during the flight from the cockpit.

    Two spotters from germany flew this year to Man for Champions League finals, not to see the match, but take some good shots from charter aircrafts.
    Nearly 300 spotters were that day at Man. Other spotters were interviewed, why and since when they do this “sport”, about the history and, of course, what does their wifes, families and friends think about their hobby!

    Unfortunally I missed the last 5-7 mins., because I got a phone call. 😡
    The spotter from Hamburg ( Helmut Bierbaum???), shot some pic’s from a AF Concorde on her last flight. I didn’t get the reg, but it might be for the museum at Sinsheim. :confused:
    There is much more to say, but I would have to to see the report again , to give you all information, photographer names and aircraft reg..

    I recommend this report for all spotter and non-spotters!!! 🙂 😀

    You might find the pic’s, I mentioned, at Jet Photos. net!!!

    If ARD sells a copy on VHS or DVD, I’ll let you know! 😉

    fightingirish

    in reply to: First RIAT photos #2666489
    fightingirish
    Participant

    Wow thanks very much for the list there fightingirish, great help! On the Mirage V, could you identify it any further if i showed you this shot? It’s a very poor shot, but quickly snapped it in hope of being able to identify it when i got home.

    Not a Mirage V, my fault!!! 😮

    The aircraft is a Dassault Mirage IVP from ERS 01.091 ‘Gascogne’ from Mont-de-Marsan.

    wannabe pilot, here is a provisional RIAT list

    fightingirish

Viewing 15 posts - 991 through 1,005 (of 1,043 total)