dark light

Nicolas10

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,936 through 1,950 (of 4,147 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Eurofighter Typhoon News & Discussions Thread V #2304375
    Nicolas10
    Participant

    Stopping Ivan at your airfield’s perimeter? Like good old Rudel? 😀
    Too bad he doesn’t have a laser pointer buckled on in this picture.

    I think tha tthe same load with 1 LDP instead of the centerline fuel tank + 2 CFTs would start to look okay.

    Nic

    in reply to: F22 production ends #2304644
    Nicolas10
    Participant

    For the last three years he’s been predicting that the USA will have food riots, tax riots, mass movement to survivalism & an economic crash as severe as that of 1929-30.

    He was wrong in 2008, 2009 & 2010. Why should he be right in 2011?

    Because it’s for 2012 maybe.

    Nic

    in reply to: F22 production ends #2304869
    Nicolas10
    Participant

    I agree with manson’s analysis.

    Nic

    in reply to: Should Nato RoEs be changed ? #2305075
    Nicolas10
    Participant

    Well, please go on your own, but don’t expect Europe to settle for a “French” standard instead of a US standard. In fact, the reason European countries can operate side by side is interoperability through a US standard because we’re to busy squabbling wrt national pride.

    I don’t expect Europe to settle for a french standard, I expect them to settle for any standard they want, preferably their own. Where’s that silly idea from anyway?

    Nic

    in reply to: Should Nato RoEs be changed ? #2305135
    Nicolas10
    Participant

    Oh by the way bluewings: example of how NATO is a terrorist organisation:

    http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gladio

    By the way. The sovient union is out, so what’s the point of NATO nowadays anyway? Oh yeah the fight on terror :rolleyes:

    Nic

    in reply to: Should Nato RoEs be changed ? #2305139
    Nicolas10
    Participant

    Europe is in a financial mess. France is about to lose its AAA and Germany may not be very far behind.

    It’s only natural for the US to take the lead in NATO ops because in military terms it’s enormous. The US have all the assets Europe lacks.

    For this to work in Europe, certain countries need to drop their national pride and see what is best for the common good, but since that won’t happen we’ll have to continue rely on the US.

    Please do rely on the US, I’ll keep my national pride thank you very much.

    As far as I’m concerned France has no business in invading or attacking sovereign countries.

    I think France should be closely allied, and cooperate with all the countries in the EU forever, but that’s that, we should not give up sovereignty about whatever to anyone, especially monetary sovereignty.

    Nic

    in reply to: Should Nato RoEs be changed ? #2305143
    Nicolas10
    Participant

    Nic :

    While it is true , this general is wrong in his thinking . The military futur lies in a strong Europe within (or not) NATO .
    Anyway , France ‘s capability to fight on Her own is a tradition and the MoD white book is still going this way .
    Nic , I believe that you have a wrong view on what France ‘s futur is .

    I’m quite pessimistic indeed, for good reason IMO.

    While I understand what you are trying to say in between the lines , I can ‘t agree . If you disagree with the USA ‘s foreign policies

    I disagree with any imperialist policy. If sarkozy does it I disagree with it too, it has nothing to do with the USA.

    I must say that they have changed a lot since Obama is running the show . Bush is gone Nic , gone.

    I don’t see what has changed. Oh wait now I see it: nothing!

    And they are almost bankrupt or not far from it.

    That’s quite worrying don’t you think? If the situation doesn’t change soon, then the only thing that the USA will be left with is a huge army and the choice between using it or die. Not really reassuring thought is it?

    The USA need a strong Europe more than ever before.

    They need to save the dollar, which probably means they’ll screw the Euro, and force european politicians to do all to keep the dollar going by sacrificing their own monetary might.

    Now , when I listen to you , it reminds me some islamic salafist …
    Sorry to say .

    Always nice to be insulted without any argumentation behind it.

    Nic

    in reply to: Should Nato RoEs be changed ? #2305661
    Nicolas10
    Participant

    They managed to take the back seat because someone agreed to do the dirty work (thank you mister sarkozy).

    BTW bluewings, I don’t remember which DSI issue that was, but there was an interview of a high ranking french general who said that interoperability was utterly expensive, and could even become a trouble to the french armies in the future because it would make them unable to fund other very necessary stuff to keep an army that could work all by itself.

    WRT NATO, as an organisation is probably the biggest terrorist group there is, with much much more terrorist acts than any other group (gladio anyone?). It’s a crying shame that we got back into this organisation.

    Nic

    in reply to: Good Russian aviation thread part 6, the return of Ivan Drago #2305671
    Nicolas10
    Participant

    They really need to get rid of the VVS Russia thing.

    Nic

    in reply to: Should Nato RoEs be changed ? #2306003
    Nicolas10
    Participant

    NATO is just a tool to pursue US policies. I think we should pull from it and step away from all this “interoperability” bull$#!t that costs a lot and eats big chunks of our independance.

    Nic

    in reply to: Should Nato RoEs be changed ? #2306055
    Nicolas10
    Participant

    Thank Sarkozy for dragging us back into NATO 😡

    in reply to: MMRCA news thread 10 #2306061
    Nicolas10
    Participant

    If they get full ToT as both vendors agreed, then they can make their MLU themselves so that shouldn’t be an issue at all. BTW they could have gone for the israeli upgrade for the Mirage 2000 if they wanted.

    Nic

    in reply to: Military Aviation News 2011 June – #2306411
    Nicolas10
    Participant

    Bloody shame either way.

    Nic

    in reply to: Military Aviation News 2011 June – #2306419
    Nicolas10
    Participant

    Let’s just dig up some toxic stuff in the ground then.

    Nevermind giving them to some museums.

    in reply to: Top Gun -The Movie Versus Reality #2306431
    Nicolas10
    Participant

    Good summary.

    The footage is just aircraft pr0n though.

    Nic

Viewing 15 posts - 1,936 through 1,950 (of 4,147 total)