The thing is, dogfight is very heavily influenced by individual pilot skill. We ‘ve had too cases of T-33 outmanouvering F16 (!), Mirage F1 gunkilling F16, but objectively, it was about a better pilot exploiting the weak spots of the opponent, not about having a better aircraft.
I thought it was clear that I was joking when I said Typhoon > Rafale :diablo:
Well a Mirage 2000-9 managed to get a gunkill against a F22, which the Rafale didn’t. So Mirage 2000 > Rafale, so if the Typhoon = Mirage 2000, then Typhoon > Rafale.
Nic
They probably use the gvt money to pay for the increase in length of their civilian version. They had to cut so much from the cost of their aircrafts that they’re probably trying to shaft the US taxpayer in other ways.
Nic
It’s true. Some of the things being turned down make me want to shoot myself. The Hornets were for the Air Force though, not the navy.
Its curious because every time I mentionned the RN anyine getting hornets, everyone would reply that the US had no spare F18 to sell, should it be SH or vanilla hornets, and now I learn that the US had at least 24 F18C+ to spare.
Nic
I’m quite curious to see the new IR missile. I really hope it is based on the Mica concept more than on the ASRAAM concept.
I hope it doesn’t prevent the Meteor to receive an IR seeker too.
Nic
it may be plummed for CFT but does it have the flight profiles to actualy use them, no doubt wacking 2 donking fuel tanks on your back will change how your aircraft flys.
Quote directly from the dassault: Fox Three 2nd issue:
http://www.dassault-aviation.com/fileadmin/user_upload/redacteur/AUTRES_DOCS/Fox_three/Fox_Three_nr_2.pdf
The CFTs are being tested at the Dassault Test Centre in Istres, and the first flight of a Rafale fitted with CFTs took place on April 18, 2001, with pilot Eric Gรฉrard at the controls. Supersonic speeds have been evaluated, and various configurations have already been successfully tested: long-range strike with three 2,000 litre drop tanks, four Mica and two Scalp stand-off missiles, and air-to-air configurations with Mica missiles. It has been determined that the CFTs had negligible impact on aircraft handling.
Nic
Iranians are not arabs, does that answer your question?
Nic
There will be no bonus for the taxpayers in NATO countries involved. Weapons will be the least important buy of Libya for several years to come.
It’s okay anyway, NATO countries are already ordering, or will soon be. Arms manufacturers don’t care where the money comes from… my pocket or yours.
Nic
I wonder if Mirage F1 could be updated according to what the Moroccan Mirages got, but there have to be enough Mirages F1 to warrant an upgrade. Maybe they would buy the last Mirages that are used by the AdlA, but those are probably getting long in the tooth.
0r else… Rafales for Libya :diablo:
Nic
To question 2. In the future Libya will have much smaller military forces. The present surplus and dated ones will be wrecked and be replaced by a much smaller number similar to Tunesia. Like the Iraq Russia will have its share in replacements too.
The price of oil is set by the OPEC and the market demands.
Well whatever stuff the future Libyan armies will order are a bonus to the replenishment of the stocks that NATO countries used over Libya ๐
Nic
There are some mistakes about the Rafale claims to stay polite. The future max external fuel-load is 8500 litre (CFTs+ETs). The present max external fuel load is 6000 litre with 3 ETs. None has taken the CFT option sofar. ๐
You are wrong on two (all) accounts;
1. 8500L external fuel is WITHOUT CFTs, but with 3 2000L ETs + 2 1250L ETs. Proof of that is that the CFTs carry 1150L hence the total would be incorrect.
2. Every Rafale produced is and has been plumbed for CFTs, so it is not about “taking the CFT option”, but about ordering the CFTs. Very different things.
Total external fuel load is 10800L as quoted directly from Dassault:
http://www.dassault-aviation.com/fileadmin/user_upload/redacteur/AUTRES_DOCS/Fox_three/Fox_Three_nr_2.pdf
It’s not because the AdlA nor the MN ordered CFTs that the option suddenly ceased to exist.
Nic
He did not mentione Rafale in that sentence either…. :diablo:
Seriously, I think this is BS — I doubt Typhoon is that much better than the Rafale. But I could be wrong of course.
Well I don’t think a Typhoon driver should be “afraid” of a Rafale, between both it will come down to the situation (alt, speed) and pilot skill mostly.
Vs a F22 however the Typhoon will be at disadvantage, as would be pretty much every other aircraft bar the future PAK-FA.
TBH I think Jon Lake was pretty fair in his latest round of articles in that particular issue of air international.
Nic
Only DACT with SU30, F16, F15. No mention of DACT with Rafales :diablo:
Nic
BTW if it is true that Argentina got an offer for 24 F18C+, and turned it down, what are the odds that the RN would want them? A F18C MLU would be nothing to sneer at and buy the RN some time to decide whether they want the F35C or not, and it would allow them to train pilots and crew for the QEII.
Nic
Here’s what normal operations could look like in a 32.000t BSAC 240. Use of deck parking would see only 9 Rhinos in the hangar. The CVW would still be made of 18x F-18E, 9x E2 (3x AEW&C), and 9x NH-90.
I would think that during normal operations at least one of the E2 would be in flight with one more on the flight deck, so this would allow for considerably more room in the hangar as is shown in your drawings.
Edit: just realised there were only 2 AEW E2… but then I think two C2 below deck is too much. You’d have one at most and maybe one either on deck or on its way to some land base and it could be turned around there.
Based on your airwing with 3 AEW E2, then I’d think 1 is below deck, 1 is on deck and 1 is in flight?
Nic