dark light

Nicolas10

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 2,161 through 2,175 (of 4,147 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Rafale News X #2314376
    Nicolas10
    Participant

    R27T & ET IIRC.

    But without mid course update I don’t know how the range could be fully utilised except for tail chase engagementsi.

    Nic

    in reply to: Eurofighter Typhoon News & Discussions Thread IV #2314386
    Nicolas10
    Participant

    Indeed it is very far fetched. The IAF has had multiple opportunities to do DACT against F16s, and they also had the opportunity to do DACT with Typhoons and with Rafales. It’s not a nameless article on an internet forum that would change anything.

    Nic

    in reply to: Eurofighter Typhoon News & Discussions Thread IV #2314468
    Nicolas10
    Participant

    Well various pakistani websites claim he was exchange pilot in the turkish air force, which would explain that PAF didn’t participate in that particular exercise.

    That said it doesn’t prove anything. It might still be a hoax.

    Nic

    in reply to: Eurofighter Typhoon News & Discussions Thread IV #2314474
    Nicolas10
    Participant

    And anyway, IIRC the first time RAF Typhoons attended Anatolian Eagle was in 8 – 19 June 2009, of which was the dates the RAF Typhoons first participated where as the PAF didn’t, at all.

    Hmmm I think I’m going to have to call BS on that little “story”.

    A stunt by the PAF to try and put the Indians off buying Typhoons? I think so, & I believe they, the Indians, know how the Typhoon performs against their aircraft anyway & they seem rather impressed by it. Nice try Pakistan.

    A quick glance on google brought me to PAF forums, where it was said that the PAF pilots were flying turkish F16s, so it could have happened if PAF pilots flew with the turkish air force (exchange pilot or visiting I don’t know).

    I seriously doubt that the PAF would try to tilt the balance like that. I’m fairly sure the IAF would smash the PAF whatever it buys for MMRCA.

    Nic

    in reply to: Eurofighter Typhoon News & Discussions Thread IV #2314485
    Nicolas10
    Participant

    You think that biased as he is, he’d make that up?

    Nic

    in reply to: Eurofighter Typhoon News & Discussions Thread IV #2314492
    Nicolas10
    Participant

    Oooops, I dropped it. :diablo:

    Guessed you mixed it up with the soap 😮

    By the looks of the canards it looks more like a Typhoon than a Rafale, maybe a case of a pilot misidentifying its foe :p

    Nic

    in reply to: Eurofighter Typhoon News & Discussions Thread IV #2314500
    Nicolas10
    Participant
    in reply to: Eurofighter Typhoon News & Discussions Thread IV #2314596
    Nicolas10
    Participant

    Impossible as we all know as only the Rafale is a stealthy upper super plane with Spectra cloaking device (why does it need it anyway?). You know Typhoon has such a big RCS and crappy ECM it can’t hide so it must fight its way through the defences.:p

    Surely you mean super duper instead of upper super? :p

    Nic

    in reply to: Which Aircraft For South Korea? #2314600
    Nicolas10
    Participant

    I wouldnt mind seeing Rafale in there.

    I doubt they will even reply to an RFI this time around.

    Remember than when the coreans made an RFI for their second round of purchase, only the F15K was proposed.

    Nic

    in reply to: Eurofighter Typhoon News & Discussions Thread IV #2314724
    Nicolas10
    Participant

    I’m sorry but I don’t see the logics. Sacrificing range to get one more air to air missile sounds silly in my opinion, and I don’t think no pilot in their right mind will look for a confrontation with enemy fighters if they have a strike mission to carry.

    It would be much wiser to use the extra range to avoid the enemy fighters altogether, and either try to go undetected, or have a fighter sweep take care of the enemy fighters.

    Seriously I really don’t understand your logics.

    Nic

    in reply to: What if….? #2001343
    Nicolas10
    Participant

    Ah yes that makes sense, it could mean they have used their numbers of cat launch and traps, but still have life in them.

    But then it’s strange that more F18C/D don’t show up in USMC land based squadrons or offered for export?

    Nic

    in reply to: Rafale News X #2314734
    Nicolas10
    Participant

    No, not compared to dedicated WVR missiles that are closer to 100G at their optimal state right before burnout and relatively low alt.

    Which missiles, got a link?

    In anycase, 50g agile enough to intercept even manoeuvering targets.

    Nic

    in reply to: Rafale News X #2314771
    Nicolas10
    Participant

    Mica isnt agile when compared to WVR missiles,
    but it does edge out AMRAAM BVR in agility.

    50G isn’t agile?

    Nic

    in reply to: Rafale News X #2314775
    Nicolas10
    Participant

    BTW how does MICA IR have such an extraordinary range when it is a mere 20 cm longer than ASRAAM and only 22 kg’s heavier ?

    Beats me.

    in reply to: Rafale News X #2314813
    Nicolas10
    Participant

    Well I really like the Mica concept of a super agile dogfight/BVR missile with both EM & IR seeker, so I hope they build up on the sam concept for its successor.

    Nic

Viewing 15 posts - 2,161 through 2,175 (of 4,147 total)