dark light

Nicolas10

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 211 through 225 (of 4,147 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Future of Belgian Air Component #2131395
    Nicolas10
    Participant

    Believing in something that there´s no proof of existance is called “Religious Belief” and no Air Force is going to include Religion in its KPP´s.

    Good luck believing something that you have proofs of. The word for that is knowing.

    Just saying.

    That said planning your airforce is an act of belief since you have to wonder what kind of threats you will face in 20 or 30 years. And you have to plan for it right now.

    Nic

    in reply to: Russia moving tac air troops to Syria #2131839
    Nicolas10
    Participant

    In case you havent noticed the USA have been massively bombing the Islamic State in Iraq for a few years now.

    All I’ve noticed is what they have claimed. Whatever they really are doing is much less noticeable to me.

    Nic

    in reply to: Russia moving tac air troops to Syria #2131861
    Nicolas10
    Participant

    You are a pretty strange chap.
    You’ve stuck a pair of links that connect chemical weapons to the Islamic State, this in Iraq, and then you ask “who is Trump going to bomb”?!
    In case you havent noticed the USA have been massively bombing the Islamic State in Iraq for a few years now.

    Just pointing out that the narrative that it was Assad who used chemical weapons against its people (without proof) and not IS is all the more ridiculous when you consider that IS has been using chemical weapons in several instances, has whatever it takes to make more.

    And yet you guys conclude that it was Assad.

    But I’m the strange one 😀

    Nic

    in reply to: Russia moving tac air troops to Syria #2131934
    Nicolas10
    Participant

    What is Iraq role in Syrian Crisis ?

    Are you suggesting IS would use chemical weapons in Iraq but not in Syria?

    in reply to: Russia moving tac air troops to Syria #2131954
    Nicolas10
    Participant
    in reply to: 2017 F-35 news and discussion thread #2132559
    Nicolas10
    Participant

    Europe is not a country. You may want to be more accurate

    in reply to: Small Air Forces Thread #16 #2132596
    Nicolas10
    Participant

    I always liked the Strikemaster. Very nice plane.

    Nic

    in reply to: Russia moving tac air troops to Syria #2133222
    Nicolas10
    Participant

    The “23” claim made by Major-General Igor Konashenkov is utterly ludicrous. It is just embarrassing that a military professional has to peddle such non-sense.

    Maybe he took lessons from Colin Powell.

    in reply to: Russia moving tac air troops to Syria #2133559
    Nicolas10
    Participant

    Gased babies chocking to death is not “increadibly stupid” enough for you?! C’mon Sintra watch what you’re writting.

    Do you still believe that the Iraqi soldiers pulled all those babies from incubators and slaughtered them?

    Just asking for a friend.

    in reply to: Russia moving tac air troops to Syria #2133563
    Nicolas10
    Participant

    Don’t the Russians have S400s there? If they knew about the strike with an hour’s warning, why didn’t they just knock down the missiles?

    The S400 missiles are probably more expensive that whatever they destroyed. The Tomahawks too I guess.

    Nic

    in reply to: Russia moving tac air troops to Syria #2133567
    Nicolas10
    Participant

    What is funny is that the Syrian government & Bashar El Assad are fighting the very guys that every bloody politician in any western country would say is our worst enemy, and yet we bomb Syria.

    What a bunch of hypocrites.

    I must say that I don’t consider half of the posters here to be even remotely decent at all judging from your posts. Many here are just a bunch of hypocrite a…… . And I rarely had an opinion that was closer to being a fact.

    Nic

    in reply to: SAAB Gripen and Gripen NG thread #4 #2134477
    Nicolas10
    Participant

    A brick more so.

    in reply to: Russia moving tac air troops to Syria #2134656
    Nicolas10
    Participant

    Why wouldn’t he/they (he meaning the regime)?
    Their world view is very different to the West and he was saved by Russia despite everything that was being pinned on him. Russia so desperately wants its deap water port, that Assad knows they won’t turn their back on him.

    Personally, what is the distinction between using fuel air explosives, barrel bombs unguided weaponry in built up areas and some chemical weapons? The distinction is not one that Syria has signed up to, and the Russians are not going to suddenly get all soppy because some chemical weapons are used every now and then.

    He has every reason to think that a) he will get away with it again b)Sarin is just another weapon to use in the fight against his enemies.

    Assad knows very well that a use of gas would be gold for all its western enemies to justify whatever they want to do in/against Syria. So using “just another weapon” that comes with such loaded political baggage would be ludicrous even if he was the real bloodthirsty dictator that everyone is trying to make him look like.

    Nic

    in reply to: Russia moving tac air troops to Syria #2134658
    Nicolas10
    Participant

    No offense scar, politics and the earlier argument we had aside, as I know you are a rational poster from your history. Isn’t it just a bit more plausible that Assad did launch this Sarin attack than what is being reported in Russian news? I’m not saying there is 100% evidence, but it it pretty clear that the preponderance of evidence is in favor.

    Why would Assad do it? He is not a dumb dude, you have to give him that. So why the hell would he do it? There is absolutely zero reason to do so if you are in Assad’s shoes. None.

    in reply to: Russia moving tac air troops to Syria #2134865
    Nicolas10
    Participant

    My gut feeling is that Trump sent out a half-arsed strike to buy himself time to run his foreign policy without being too much criticized by the establishment. He probably has to fight as many internal foes as external and the strike was maybe aimed at shutting them down for a while. They way I see it the message was internal if anything.

    After all he can’t realistically it’s a false flag without implying the US has acted so many time on false flags in the past. Would be a political suicide.

    Nic

Viewing 15 posts - 211 through 225 (of 4,147 total)