Remind me again who it was that pushed the US into going into Libya?

Oh please, sarkozy couldn’t decide to put his finger into his nose alone. He was doing the the US administration’s job in their place so they wouldn’t seem too aggressive taking down one country after the other.

Nic

Yet you got images of the article that was taken offline.

Nic

also the French regime believe A was behind this chemical attack.

Fixed that for you.

3 years for an integration study???

Yeah it’s plug and play with their UAI or whatever it’s called.

Nic

Sigh.

2 fighters being able to bring 4000kg payload to 1000 km, one uses 5000lb fuel the other needs 7000lb fuel. Which is better?

1 fighter maneuvers better than another at 50% fuel, but the other has twice the range in that configuration? Is that a fair comparison or is it a biased comparison? It’s ridiculous to compare “at 50% fuel”, you should be comparing at similar range/payload achievable. What good is it to be more maneuverable at 50% fuel if you can’t reach the target while the “less maneuverable fighter” can?

As I said subjectivity is flawed. Why not comparing real data instead?

Who cares what % of fuel there is? Comparing at given target range vs payload vs fuel used is the only worthwhile comparison.

The fact that it represents 10, 50, 60 or 90% internal fuel is totally irrelevant. Subjectivity sucks.

Nic

Very light. It’s happy hour here. In any case, T-VIP isn’t American (I don’t think) so the whole America-stronk thing doesn’t make sense.

You can take him if you want.

Scratch that… please take him.