dark light

Nicolas10

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 2,386 through 2,400 (of 4,147 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Rafale News X #2321938
    Nicolas10
    Participant

    This is a rafale news thread.

    Nic

    in reply to: B-1 Bomber with AAMs (Missile Mothership) Rand concept #2321940
    Nicolas10
    Participant

    Why not use a B2 then?

    Nic

    in reply to: Nimrod R1 earns a reprieve #2321944
    Nicolas10
    Participant

    Okay thanks for the correction.

    Nic

    in reply to: Nimrod R1 earns a reprieve #2322903
    Nicolas10
    Participant

    In the article they say that retirement was decided in 2008, so IMO these planes must soldier on because their replacements (MR4 and sentinel R1) have been scrapped.

    Nic

    in reply to: First export order for the LCA??? #2009909
    Nicolas10
    Participant

    Didn’t the Rafale have issues operating for the Foch? If, memory serves me seem like it was a weight issue and/or something to do with the catapults???

    I don’t think brazil was ever serious about using the Sao Paulo in anger. It was more about developing naval aviation culture and compentences. The Sao Paulo will probably be retired and replaced once the FX arrives in navy service.

    Nic

    in reply to: Rafale's RBE2 AESA pic and news! #2335132
    Nicolas10
    Participant

    Or maybe, the RAF, the AMI and the Luftwaffe had capable AG platforms unlike Adla who untill very recently was forced to use the 2000D in theatre?
    Lets put it bluntly, untill very recently the RAFALE deployment to A´stan had a lot more to do with sales propaganda than any meaningfull combat capability. Sending an aircraft who had zero capability to designate a target to do medium level CAS was simply absurd in military terms.

    I think you are underestimating the Mirage 2000 a great deal.

    Nic

    in reply to: Rafale's RBE2 AESA pic and news! #2335138
    Nicolas10
    Participant

    The Typhoon with two external tanks and one LDP, carries four Paveways and one internal gun, that doubles the number of PGM´s that the standard Mirage 2000D the ADLA usualy uses in A´stan (while having more range), not to mention that it equals the typical RAFALE (or USAF Viper) load for the same mission.

    Why compare typhoon with the older Mirage 2000 and not the Rafale?

    as for equalling the “usual” Rafale load, maybe but does the range remain comparable?

    Nic

    in reply to: Libyan Air Force Mirage F.1's in Malta #2335795
    Nicolas10
    Participant

    I think those Mirages look absolutely fantastic. awesome camo and brand new looks…

    I hope things turn allright for lybian people fast enough.

    Nic

    in reply to: Rafale's RBE2 AESA pic and news! #2340163
    Nicolas10
    Participant

    I am curious about the physics about your claim: you say the original version has 1500 modules, and the current version has 2000 modules, but they use the same modules? That is fascinating.

    😀

    Nice one!

    Nic

    in reply to: Rafale's RBE2 AESA pic and news! #2341634
    Nicolas10
    Participant

    To switch seamlessly between modes doesn’t mean that the radar do both at the same time, quite the opposite. Nor has anyone said that the rbe2 can’t do air to ground. Some modes need to be implemented in the radar programs (gmti/t, isar, maybe even EW), once this is done we will see how they can all be done at the same time.

    That said, I’m fairly certain that the rbe2 will be an excellent radar, at least equal to most of its rivals, and I’m eagerly waiting to see it operatonal on Rafales.

    Nic

    in reply to: Rafale's RBE2 AESA pic and news! #2341694
    Nicolas10
    Participant

    I understand what you are saying, and I don’t disagree, but the fact remains that more modes and interleaving between those modes are required, at least by the uae and probably some by adla/MN.

    I have no doubt that those are in the works and soon to be implemented on the production Rafales. I would think GMTI/T will be available when aesa Rafales enter frontline service, and I don’t doubt that pilots will be able to interleave betweene atoa and atog + ground mapping functions.

    Nic

    in reply to: Rafale's RBE2 AESA pic and news! #2341726
    Nicolas10
    Participant

    I only repeat it because idiots keep saying such stupid things as “Selex has no production AESA”, & so I remind them what nonsense that is.

    I know 😀

    in reply to: Rafale's RBE2 AESA pic and news! #2341803
    Nicolas10
    Participant

    This is when swerve says for the billionth’ time that selex has already developped aesa that are on offer and even flying onboard USCG planes.

    BTW does anyone know why the USCG didn’t go for a domestic solution?

    Nic

    in reply to: Rafale's RBE2 AESA pic and news! #2341832
    Nicolas10
    Participant

    Good Nic, then be as wrong as he was!

    That is what he said in his post 98 of this thread!
    That is what I picked up and answered!

    Do you want to go back to that debate, mec?
    BTW, I copy the posts I answer to on my HD
    so even editing won’t cut it!

    Be your own guest at that endless game!
    Enough for today.

    Good luck in all of your analog lives;
    it is way more important, Tay.

    Much ado about nothing once said The Bard; I concur!

    OK let’s play this, only I will write in french because I don’t understand your english.

    Pour mémoire, voici ce qu’a dit scorpion :

    More interleaving just means more interleaving Up to date the RBE2 can interleave mapping and AA tracking, but can it overlay GMTI/T/SEA contacts on a SAR map? Can it simultaneously acquire AA and AG targets? From what is know there is still a lot of room for more interleaving!

    Or bluewings a confirmé :
    – pas de GMTI/T
    – Pas de détection de cible terrestres et de cibles aériennes simultanément sinon la possibilité de traquer une cible désignée par un autre capteur que le radar.

    Je ne vois pas ou scorpion a dit que le RBE2 n’était pas capable de détecter une cible marine, ou que le rafale devait utiliser l’osf pour tirer sur une cible marine.

    Nic

    in reply to: Rafale's RBE2 AESA pic and news! #2342007
    Nicolas10
    Participant

    Well I’m with scorpion on that one.

    He never said that the RBE2 couln’t interleave tasks, nor as you seemed to imply that the RBE2 couln’t detect sea targets. I honestly wonder where you got that from.

    He said that it wasn’t known whether the RBE2 could detect a to a & a to g targets simultaneously, and all the while following a tf profile or mapping a sar picture. If you get links to prove that it can then be my guest and post them.

    Nic

Viewing 15 posts - 2,386 through 2,400 (of 4,147 total)