dark light

Nicolas10

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 2,416 through 2,430 (of 4,147 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Hot Dog Typhoon thread III #2344173
    Nicolas10
    Participant

    Not really a proof of anything. By the same token you could conclude that the 75KN rafale has way enough power as none of their users have asked for a power increase. & one of those users even operates it from carriers, so you would think they would need more power.

    Nic

    in reply to: Rafale's RBE2 AESA pic and news! #2348481
    Nicolas10
    Participant

    In the french doctrine, the radar is there to bear your missiles onto the target, not to serve as a mini awacs. So either Dassault, Thales, the adla and the MN are stupid or their are confident the current number of modules will be sufficient.

    With plans to add more aesa arrays for 360° coverage, electrical power and cooling could become an issue when you have 1500 modules up front already. I don’t know if it could be an issue, but definitely something to think about in my opinion.

    Nic

    in reply to: Rafale's RBE2 AESA pic and news! #2348586
    Nicolas10
    Participant

    Great song 🙂

    in reply to: Rafales for Brasil #4, Cachorro-quente! #2348891
    Nicolas10
    Participant

    In my book, 100% ToT means all the knowledge to maintain and upgrade the aircrafts. Build new parts, integrate weapons, upgrade software and so on.

    I don’t think it means teaching Brazil to develop a new plane from scratch.

    Nic

    in reply to: Rafales for Brasil #4, Cachorro-quente! #2351317
    Nicolas10
    Participant

    I for one thing the timeframe is a little bit short considering the delivery date of 2027. Keep in mind this is Brazil!

    Nic

    Nicolas10
    Participant

    This plane looks very good, and the paint scheme is just awesome…

    I wish they used it for some fighters

    Nic

    in reply to: Someone Besides Hot Dogs's F-35 Cyber News Thread #5 #2352380
    Nicolas10
    Participant

    I agree Sens.

    Nic

    in reply to: Someone Besides Hot Dogs's F-35 Cyber News Thread #5 #2352392
    Nicolas10
    Participant

    Which is a pretty silly point:

    a useless version added costs, delay, complexity, and compromised the overall design of other versions. It’s not even certain right now that this version isn’t going to be axed. How this could be considered a positive is beyond me.

    awesome program management guys!

    Nic

    in reply to: Rafales for Brasil #4, Cachorro-quente! #2352397
    Nicolas10
    Participant

    If Taiwan really meant business, they could have bought the M2k production line & ToT after India declined to take it (oh no I start to use the & like swerve does), and be able to build and maintain and upgrade their Mirages as they see fit. They could have integrated whatever missile they wanted on them, be it israeli, south african or brazilian if eads didn’t want to provide more Micas.

    But it seems these people are more interested in filling their own pockets (see frigates deal) than doing what’s best for Taiwan (if they’re not PRC agents in the first place).

    Nic

    in reply to: Rafales for Brasil #4, Cachorro-quente! #2352400
    Nicolas10
    Participant

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/La_Fayette_class_frigate#Taiwan_frigates_scandal

    http://www.nytimes.com/2004/01/30/news/30iht-t1_88.html

    This is probably the reason why France didn’t want to sell Micas to Taiwan after the frigates scandal which had huge repercussions on the french political class. It seems it’s not easy to trade with Taiwan and keeping your hands clean.

    Nic

    in reply to: Saab JAS 39 Gripen Info # 2 #2357219
    Nicolas10
    Participant

    Now that you speak of it, my 900s costs an arm to maintain!

    in reply to: Saab JAS 39 Gripen Info # 2 #2357273
    Nicolas10
    Participant

    I agree that the pdf is pure marketing. Whats the point comparing the gripen NG with planes that carry twice the armament?

    I for one don’t buy into the “huge” difference in operational costs, especially with latest generation planes. I’ve never seen hard numbers to confirm those or even to compare with other planes.

    Nic

    in reply to: A400M News #2357364
    Nicolas10
    Participant

    Don’t worry, it’s just MSN5001 starting fatigue testing.

    Nic

    in reply to: counter stealth: the way forward for Europe? #2362945
    Nicolas10
    Participant

    Well since fighters spend most of their missions in peace time training missions, with at most 1 center fuel tank, drag isn’t going to be a huge issue most of the time; and in this day and age saving on HUGE amounts of fuel is quite nice indeed.

    Should the turd hit the fan, drag may be superior at first but then it goes lower as stores and fuel tanks are expended, and as I said in another thread, accompanying stealth ucavs don’t need training flights.

    Nic

    in reply to: "Super Hornet better than Harrier, Tornado and Typhoon" #2363089
    Nicolas10
    Participant

    Or integrate a2sm so you can stay at low alt & off boresight to fire your weapons from the relative safety. For the rest there is eurocard mastercard (or storm shadow).

    Nic

Viewing 15 posts - 2,416 through 2,430 (of 4,147 total)