dark light

Nicolas10

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 2,476 through 2,490 (of 4,147 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Charles de Gaulle could be out 4 to 6 months #2021151
    Nicolas10
    Participant

    Holy **** I wanted to check out on the news on the latest cdg trouble and totally missed the date.

    CdG is now actually on its way to Suez

    http://www.marianne2.fr/blogsecretdefense/Le-Charles-de-Gaulle-fait-route-vers-Suez-et-l-ocean-indien_a6.html

    Sorry for the mistake… 😮

    in reply to: A400M News #2366118
    Nicolas10
    Participant

    The A400M will rock, and the USAF will be sorry that it can’t buy it instead of yet another version of the C130.

    Nic

    in reply to: Fighters that never flew ! your own list #2366562
    Nicolas10
    Participant

    But they flew!

    My bad I missed the part where they have never flown 😮

    in reply to: HELLENIC AIR FORCE NEWS & DISCUSSION #2366564
    Nicolas10
    Participant

    Other news: the programmed excercize between HAF and Rafale F3 of Charles DeGaulle was cancelled at the last minute. According to Defencenet, the last time, the greek B52+ supported with Erieye arrived to a 6 to 1 kill ratio against the Rafale F3 and opened the way for the “sinking” of the Charles De Gaulle by Mirage2000 armed with Exocets.

    The CdG had to sail back to port after finding some electrical fault somewhere.

    Nic

    in reply to: Fighters that never flew ! your own list #2377582
    Nicolas10
    Participant

    I like the Mirage F2, G8 and most of all Mirage 4000!

    And of course the F20 and F23

    N

    in reply to: The Dawn of a new era…UK/France military cooperation #2377631
    Nicolas10
    Participant

    I’ve been watching the show a couple years ago, the presenter was much more provocative and didn’t give up until he was answered the question. After he went on France 2 it changed quite a bit. I guess he was told to put some water into his wine or else no more France 2.

    When it comes to the other presenter who does a show once in a while, you can’t find a worse journalist. He cuts anyone who’s going to say something interesting on purpose.

    Nic

    in reply to: The Dawn of a new era…UK/France military cooperation #2377652
    Nicolas10
    Participant

    BTW c dans l’air is not what it used to be… :confused:

    Censorship has struck again…

    N

    in reply to: The Dawn of a new era…UK/France military cooperation #2377656
    Nicolas10
    Participant

    Not entirely sold on UCAVs as a primary strike platform. To me they’re more like a reusable Tomahawk.

    Which is what you use on the first day of war 😉

    Except you get IRST/EO/ESM/SAR radar sensors onboard.

    Nic

    in reply to: The Dawn of a new era…UK/France military cooperation #2377666
    Nicolas10
    Participant

    I’d seriously consider dumping the F-35 altogether and just go with the Rafale, it’d make a lot more sense. BAE Systems would still manufacture parts for the F-35, so it’s not like the UK would be loosing out on much. Having one type of fast jet on a carrier is just easier overall.

    As they say in the British Armed Forces,” KISS”. (Keep It Simple Stupid)

    + they could negociate some kind of offset for a big enough Rafale purchase (british built PA2!!!).

    (And please integrate brimstone, Alarm and Asraam!)

    Nic

    in reply to: The Dawn of a new era…UK/France military cooperation #2377814
    Nicolas10
    Participant

    So the UK are going to build two carriers and sell one?

    1/ Build the second one as PA2 in exchange for a purchase of Rafales instead of the F35C.

    2/ Cooperate with Dassault and merge Neron with Taranis for a carrier capable stealth UCAV.

    3/ Develop the Eurofighter some more and form a RAF fleet of Eurofighters and Neuranis.

    4/ If money permits build a third carrier for the UK (2nd for the RN), to benefit from the economies of scale of buying three ships instead of two. Also market it to India with some transfer of thechnology but 1 built in the UK.

    Nic

    in reply to: Harrier – Your Thoughts? #2383396
    Nicolas10
    Participant

    Well a core of RN pilots could be trained and serve as exchange pilots in the US with the USN and USMC and even the french aéronavale to remain current with carrier ops, while an other core could serve detached to the RAF to keep used to real operations (Iraq, Afghanistan).

    When the RN gets its new AC, you can mix the experience of those two cores of pilots and get up to operational status pretty quick.

    Nic

    in reply to: Harrier – Your Thoughts? #2384735
    Nicolas10
    Participant

    I personally think they are foolish to scrap the airframes. They should store them and spend a smaller amount to use them for their first aircraft carrier or any significant event that would rear its head in the foreseeable future.

    What would you do with such planes without proficient pilots?

    Nic

    in reply to: HELLENIC AIR FORCE NEWS & DISCUSSION #2384744
    Nicolas10
    Participant

    It seems like you guys aren’t that bankrupt after all.

    Nic

    in reply to: MMRCA News And Discussion V #2385884
    Nicolas10
    Participant

    Power could be distributed according to where you need it. Have you never watched star trek?

    Anyway we are not at a technological level to allow 360° AESA coverage yet. The technology has to improve quite a bit because of the issues you raised, that’s why it prpbably won’t happen before the MLU of the 4+ gen fighters.

    (haha I was thinking of a SMS I was to write to my girlfriend and I mixed up the messages so I almost sent you hugs and kisses)

    Nic

    in reply to: MMRCA News And Discussion V #2385975
    Nicolas10
    Participant

    It depends how they are used, and how many tasks they are given at any given time.

    There’s definately room in the cheeks of the Rafale (for instance) to fit a good size array for 180+° coverage, especially if you can remove the AESA antennaes of SPECTRA as they become redundant.

    To me a swashplate is a transitional step until 360° coverage is achieved. Convenient for a while until the rest gets to the next step.

    And all that doesn’t diminish the fact that with modern tactics, scenarios as envisionned by aspis earlier in the thread (1vs1 frontal BVR fight) get more and more unlikely, especially with stealth planes.

    Nic

Viewing 15 posts - 2,476 through 2,490 (of 4,147 total)