dark light

Nicolas10

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 2,551 through 2,565 (of 4,147 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Rafale News IX #2421271
    Nicolas10
    Participant

    How dare you suggest that the french are capable of building such complicated pieces of engineering?

    I wonder which path jackjack will take now:

    – Spectra rocks because it is made in the US
    or
    – Spectra sucks because it’s not made in the US

    The bets are open.

    Nic

    in reply to: Rafale News IX #2421552
    Nicolas10
    Participant

    I’d like to know first if spectra really is manufactured by thales US before even trying to guess how it works.

    Nowhere other than on this website you can find that Thales is made in the US, and I seriously doubt that it is.

    Googling SPECTRA + Thales USA doesn’t bring anything other than keypublishing 😉

    As for the swedes, it’s BS, it’s the Swiss that have been contracted to manufacture a part for the AESA, as Scorpion said as a way to offset an eventual Rafale purchase by the swiss.

    Nic

    in reply to: Could the F35B operate from a Mistral class BPC #2028970
    Nicolas10
    Participant

    aesthetics > effectiveness when it comes to war machines, as they’re almost never used anyway.

    nic

    in reply to: Could the F35B operate from a Mistral class BPC #2028972
    Nicolas10
    Participant

    Lets trade one Mistral for one conventional CVF. Only with just one island because the two island concept is ugly.

    Nic

    in reply to: Rafale News IX #2424317
    Nicolas10
    Participant

    I think it’s quite consistent for them to ask assembly of falcon :p

    mer il et fou

    in reply to: Rafale News IX #2424874
    Nicolas10
    Participant

    This is getting ridiculous. Everyone and their mother want an assembly line.

    Nic

    in reply to: Super Etendard in air combat #2370348
    Nicolas10
    Participant

    I’m aware that the use of some equipment means they need to remove equipment for extra space, but the guy on air defense said he thought the gun needed to go in order to use the ventral tank. Not that it needed to go to use certain weapons.

    I wonder if krav could confirm this?

    Nic

    in reply to: Super Etendard in air combat #2370622
    Nicolas10
    Participant

    Sorry to revive a very old thread but I think I may have found why the SEM doesn’t fly with 1 ventral tank and 2 GBUs on the wing points.

    On post 376 of this page http://www.air-defense.net/forum/index.php/topic,10082.360.html Pascal says:

    Point central de fuselage
    élément important:
    il me semble que quand ce point est servi le chassis canons est déposé

    Central fuselage point
    Important fact: it seems to me that when the ventral point is taken, the gun has to be deposed.

    So the MN would keep it free to be able to use the gun for Afghan missions.

    Nic

    in reply to: Mirage 2000 in 2010 #2371645
    Nicolas10
    Participant

    Yes -where did you get the Mk82 numbers from?

    it’s 3X4 250kg weapons (on quadruple pylons, one on belly hardpoint and one each in inner wing hardpoint) + 1 on each of the four belly hardpoints.

    edit: oops forgot that phantom said 18

    Nic

    in reply to: The Era You'd most Liked To Be A Fighter/Bomber Pilot. #2372483
    Nicolas10
    Participant

    Being one of Chenault’s flying tigers.

    P40B+a prize in gold for every enemy plane shot down and a pretty nice jacket. 😀

    Nic

    in reply to: C-17 crash Alaska #2378852
    Nicolas10
    Participant

    sad loss for the families…

    in reply to: Euro-fighter F-35 fight heats up! #2381099
    Nicolas10
    Participant

    F-35 is a bomb truck, not a fighter.

    I normally stay away from threads like this, but the above comment made me snicker….are you serious? I assume you’re part of the F-35 test program and thus you know how it flies and fights?

    As for your F/A-18 vs. F-16 comments, I’m also inclined to laugh. Both are good at air-to-air combat, but each must be used to its strengths. Rest assured, an F/A-18 is more than capable of beating an F-16, if the right tactics are used. The same is true of the F-16’s capability to defeat the F/A-18…again if the right tactics are used. They simply approach the same mission in a different manner, and are thus suited to certain situations better than the other jet.

    I’ve said my peace, but I couldn’t let comments like that go…now I’ll go back to my threads about old airplanes. 🙂

    The point that they both evolved from pure light weight figthers (YF16 and YF17) still stands though; unlike the F35.

    Nic

    in reply to: Military Aviation News from around the world – V #2381722
    Nicolas10
    Participant

    Can America really afford to go for another War ? Especially if it escalates to a point where you need boots on the ground ? Will Obama risk it ?

    They will go to war should Iran decide to trade oil in € instead of $. All that nuclear mumbo jumbo is just an excuse to go to war.

    Nic

    in reply to: Rafale News IX #2381896
    Nicolas10
    Participant

    Well IIRC new intakes have already been designed by dassault, and it is said their RCS is lower than the current ones.

    Nic

    PS: please rafale fans don’t feed the troll, it’s pointless debating with him.

    Nicolas10
    Participant

    The Cold War ended 1990. 😉

    I know 😎

Viewing 15 posts - 2,551 through 2,565 (of 4,147 total)