How dare you suggest that the french are capable of building such complicated pieces of engineering?
I wonder which path jackjack will take now:
– Spectra rocks because it is made in the US
or
– Spectra sucks because it’s not made in the US
The bets are open.
Nic
I’d like to know first if spectra really is manufactured by thales US before even trying to guess how it works.
Nowhere other than on this website you can find that Thales is made in the US, and I seriously doubt that it is.
Googling SPECTRA + Thales USA doesn’t bring anything other than keypublishing 😉
As for the swedes, it’s BS, it’s the Swiss that have been contracted to manufacture a part for the AESA, as Scorpion said as a way to offset an eventual Rafale purchase by the swiss.
Nic
aesthetics > effectiveness when it comes to war machines, as they’re almost never used anyway.
nic
Lets trade one Mistral for one conventional CVF. Only with just one island because the two island concept is ugly.
Nic
I think it’s quite consistent for them to ask assembly of falcon :p
mer il et fou
This is getting ridiculous. Everyone and their mother want an assembly line.
Nic
I’m aware that the use of some equipment means they need to remove equipment for extra space, but the guy on air defense said he thought the gun needed to go in order to use the ventral tank. Not that it needed to go to use certain weapons.
I wonder if krav could confirm this?
Nic
Sorry to revive a very old thread but I think I may have found why the SEM doesn’t fly with 1 ventral tank and 2 GBUs on the wing points.
On post 376 of this page http://www.air-defense.net/forum/index.php/topic,10082.360.html Pascal says:
Point central de fuselage
élément important:
il me semble que quand ce point est servi le chassis canons est déposé
Central fuselage point
Important fact: it seems to me that when the ventral point is taken, the gun has to be deposed.
So the MN would keep it free to be able to use the gun for Afghan missions.
Nic
Yes -where did you get the Mk82 numbers from?
it’s 3X4 250kg weapons (on quadruple pylons, one on belly hardpoint and one each in inner wing hardpoint) + 1 on each of the four belly hardpoints.
edit: oops forgot that phantom said 18
Nic
Being one of Chenault’s flying tigers.
P40B+a prize in gold for every enemy plane shot down and a pretty nice jacket. 😀
Nic
sad loss for the families…
F-35 is a bomb truck, not a fighter.
I normally stay away from threads like this, but the above comment made me snicker….are you serious? I assume you’re part of the F-35 test program and thus you know how it flies and fights?
As for your F/A-18 vs. F-16 comments, I’m also inclined to laugh. Both are good at air-to-air combat, but each must be used to its strengths. Rest assured, an F/A-18 is more than capable of beating an F-16, if the right tactics are used. The same is true of the F-16’s capability to defeat the F/A-18…again if the right tactics are used. They simply approach the same mission in a different manner, and are thus suited to certain situations better than the other jet.
I’ve said my peace, but I couldn’t let comments like that go…now I’ll go back to my threads about old airplanes. 🙂
The point that they both evolved from pure light weight figthers (YF16 and YF17) still stands though; unlike the F35.
Nic
Can America really afford to go for another War ? Especially if it escalates to a point where you need boots on the ground ? Will Obama risk it ?
They will go to war should Iran decide to trade oil in € instead of $. All that nuclear mumbo jumbo is just an excuse to go to war.
Nic
Well IIRC new intakes have already been designed by dassault, and it is said their RCS is lower than the current ones.
Nic
PS: please rafale fans don’t feed the troll, it’s pointless debating with him.
The Cold War ended 1990. 😉
I know 😎