dark light

Nicolas10

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 466 through 480 (of 4,147 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: So no Scorpene for Australia after all. #2012710
    Nicolas10
    Participant

    Good they removed to crime of high treason from the law a few years back… :confused:

    in reply to: Yeager says F-22 and the F-35 are a waste of money #2155136
    Nicolas10
    Participant

    Can you point out where did i said that i got classified information? dont try to use that kind of strawman argument with me! it only shows that you are too desperately want to win the argument but cannot come up with anything reasonable and logical.
    I simply pointed out that there is no point for a contractors to share classifieds information with Chuck Yeager if that kind of information can get him in jail

    I was merely pointing out that you have no more classified information than Chuck Yeager has, provided he has got access to absolutely none since he retired. Which leads me to believe that you think you are smarter than him & more fit to decide which traits a fighter should have.

    Nic

    in reply to: Yeager says F-22 and the F-35 are a waste of money #2155142
    Nicolas10
    Participant

    I think the point is that the people with the classified information are continuing with stealth.

    I could put it another way: people profiting from it are continuing with stealth. Being the armies of bureaucrats or the companies that cash in taxpayer’s money.

    Nic

    in reply to: Yeager says F-22 and the F-35 are a waste of money #2155195
    Nicolas10
    Participant

    Given the age of him, most of his friends in the military already retired or death. And to be honest, there is absolutely no reason for a military contractors to share classified information with an old retired test pilot ( if it is the kind of information that can get them fired or face prison time) , like what the heck would they gain by doing that? asking for advice? Yeager is just a test pilot

    So what classified information do you have that Chuck Yeager doesn’t? If anything compared to program insiders, he doesn’t earn money off it which makes him less biased. And God forbid he made friends with younger dudes that he trained or commanded, or any other way. This guy is a legend after all.

    Nic

    in reply to: Yeager says F-22 and the F-35 are a waste of money #2155273
    Nicolas10
    Participant

    F-16 had more growth potential and was the better multirole aircraft.

    And this has been proven when exactly?

    in reply to: Yeager says F-22 and the F-35 are a waste of money #2155282
    Nicolas10
    Participant

    Unfortunately for you, that simply does not hold water. Until recently, the pilots who were speaking about the F-35’s capabilities were Norwegian, and Dutch.

    Considering the controversies of the purchases of those planes in both countries, you’d think they would risk their carrier just the same.

    Nic

    in reply to: Yeager says F-22 and the F-35 are a waste of money #2155293
    Nicolas10
    Participant

    Would it? At least I’m living in the 21st century with knowledge of 21st century technology, whereas Richthofen would likely consider a radar to be sourcery.

    So did Chuck Yeager get somehow time warped from WWII straight to his 2016 twitter account, missing all the technology developments in between? Is he unfit to understand them as well as you? You make absolutely no sense, and I suggest you should show more respect to people who have proven themselves times and times again, whereas the only thing you have proven is your trolling abilities.

    Nic

    in reply to: Yeager says F-22 and the F-35 are a waste of money #2155323
    Nicolas10
    Participant

    And what year was he out? I may as well ask von Richthofen for his opinion on what makes a good fighter.

    Richthofen’s opinion surely would be more valuable than some random internet armchair expert who changes nickname every other month.

    Nic

    in reply to: Yeager says F-22 and the F-35 are a waste of money #2155394
    Nicolas10
    Participant

    Good football players don’t always make good managers.

    And what was his rank when he was out?

    Nic

    in reply to: Yeager says F-22 and the F-35 are a waste of money #2155605
    Nicolas10
    Participant

    Actually, I’m old fart who served his country and is currently gainfully employed as a programmer in the Healthcare industry.

    I wasn’t suggesting that you were of the type I alluded to, and I’m sorry if I came through that way. I was merely stating that I’d trust an old man who actually has a lifetime of experience, including in combat & other quite dangerous forms of flight, than a younger one, or any other form who never saw combat.

    Nic

    in reply to: Yeager says F-22 and the F-35 are a waste of money #2155665
    Nicolas10
    Participant

    Better than a young retard who only dreams of getting unemployment benefits & stay on his fat **** all day long.

    Nic

    in reply to: Yeager says F-22 and the F-35 are a waste of money #2155701
    Nicolas10
    Participant

    It happened and the source was a couple of tweets.
    http://www.businessinsider.com/general-chuck-yeager-f-22-f-35-2016-8

    With all due respect to Gen Yeager, the last time he had anything to do with combat, he was flying with big spiny thing in front, had to get the enemy within 1 mile & EXACTLY in front of him, and only had his Mk1 Eyeballs for Situational Awareness… Someone call the the Home, one got loose.

    & when was the last time YOU saw combat?

    in reply to: Russia moving tac air troops to Syria #2155705
    Nicolas10
    Participant

    But are datalinks in question directional? And if so, how directional? SAM and radar systems are not just the hunters; they are also the hunted. They need to move regularly in order to avoid being targeted. While some people get excited by the fact that a Yugoslav SA-3 unit shot down an F-117, I’m equally interested by the fact that the unit in question had to keep moving regularly in order to avoid being attacked., and is reported to have clocked up 100,000 km during a 78 day conflict. How many hours does it take to travel 100,000 km? The figures suggest that it didn’t spend a lot of time deployed and ready to fire.

    None of this being the result of the F117 presence in the area.

    Also, this suggests that this particular SAM team didn’t have much time to observe the regular routes flown by the F117.

    Nic

    in reply to: So no Scorpene for Australia after all. #2012783
    Nicolas10
    Participant

    Ah good to know thanks. Still worrying to say the least. How do you trust a supplied who gets technical information filter?

    in reply to: Low Level…… #2159218
    Nicolas10
    Participant

    Miami Vice OST?

    They were different indeed!

    Nic

Viewing 15 posts - 466 through 480 (of 4,147 total)