dark light

Nicolas10

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 556 through 570 (of 4,147 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Indian Air Force Thread 20 #2198615
    Nicolas10
    Participant

    Maybe they want to set up a manufacturing line for the Mig 35?

    BTW what makes you guys think that the Rafale couldn’t be one of the fighters selected for domestic production?

    Nic

    in reply to: The indefensible Baltic states. #2198617
    Nicolas10
    Participant

    They were all under the Russian yoke in recent decades and prior to that in some cases centuries. At the first opportunity, presumably to gain some security and freedom from Russian “benevolence,” they joined a military alliance originally designed to thwart Russian ambitions.
    That should tell anybody capable of thought what those countries think of Russian ambitions. Russia is not threatened, Russia is paranoid.

    So what to do with the elections prior to the coup in the Ukraine? Seems like the pro-russians had won that one, and the west needed to foment a military coup to restore power to the pro-western side.

    Also what to make of the latest elections in Poland?

    Your posts make no sense whatsoever.

    Nic

    in reply to: RuAF News and development Thread part 15 #2198620
    Nicolas10
    Participant

    Such a big beak on the Su-30, out of proportionately long. ‘Toucan’ would be a good nickname for them. Su-34 can be the silly nickname of Platypus, so no reason Su-30 couldn’t be Toucan.

    Su-30SME Super Toucan. I like that.

    Nic

    in reply to: Russia moving tac air troops to Syria #2198666
    Nicolas10
    Participant

    I can cite any number of article about Russian culture, history etc which are interesting and not anti-Russian. You see what you want to see.

    Cite them then!

    in reply to: Russia moving tac air troops to Syria #2198834
    Nicolas10
    Participant

    Part of the reason Russian airstrikes are way more effective than NATO airstrikes (provided NATO actually cares to be accurate).
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DtFc175UT4E#t=27

    in reply to: Russia moving tac air troops to Syria #2198840
    Nicolas10
    Participant
    in reply to: The indefensible Baltic states. #2198841
    Nicolas10
    Participant

    Wrong thread sorry

    in reply to: The indefensible Baltic states. #2198896
    Nicolas10
    Participant

    No. The Russian Federation could have been lent some money. World Bank, IMF etc could have provided funds. Lots of countries receive loans from these institutions without becoming client states of the USA. Yes, there are strings: the government wanting a loan needs to demonstrate that it plans to run its economy in a way that will enable it to repay the loan.

    :stupid:

    in reply to: Russia moving tac air troops to Syria #2198956
    Nicolas10
    Participant

    Ugh, can you guys stop going wildly off topic?

    Anyone who isn’t blind knows CERTAIN NATIONS have zero moral authority to complain about civilian casualties, but its not even about that.

    So far the claims leveled against the VKS and the proof submitted is shaky at best.

    Do I need to remind you that there is no need to prove facts?

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QTwAZOH33tU

    in reply to: Russia moving tac air troops to Syria #2198978
    Nicolas10
    Participant

    To put things in perspective US bombings in normandy killed 20 000 civilians before & around D-Day. They destroyed 96% of Tilly-la Campagne, 95% of Vire, 88% of Villers-Bocage, 82% of The Havre, 77% of St-Lô, 76% of Falaise, 75% of Caen & Lisieux, 100% of Aynay sur Odon, & Evrecy lost 1/3 of all its inhabitants while 86% of it was flattened.

    With friends like these who need enemies?

    Now those NATO fanboys are crying a river for a bombing of two hospitals which is most probably fake?

    Come on be serious.

    Nic

    in reply to: Russia moving tac air troops to Syria #2198987
    Nicolas10
    Participant

    meanwhile they’re trying to break up the coalition, getting Iran to withdraw. although I doubt the Iranians are that stupid, if Assad falls they’ll have no more state allies in the Middle East

    Iran is next on the US agenda, so basically they’d have to be completely dumb to stop supporting Assad & Russia on that one.

    What would be nice is China’s involvement with Russia & Syria.

    Nic

    in reply to: General Discussion #237290
    Nicolas10
    Participant

    Instead of arming your police, why not just stop everyone and their Kalashnikovs from entering the country?

    The only reason for this crap is mass immigration. When I first heard of the attacks in Paris I couldn’t contain my laughter, because an hour or so before I had been watching a TV documentary on WWI where they were telling us what kind of powder-keg the Balkans were because of the mix of religions/cultures.

    It’s just as funny as when you watch Rambo III again, and hear the speech of the colonel Trautman after the US invasion.

    It seems hypocrisy is all the rage in the XXI-st century.

    Nic

    in reply to: To Arm, or not, ??????? #1802841
    Nicolas10
    Participant

    Instead of arming your police, why not just stop everyone and their Kalashnikovs from entering the country?

    The only reason for this crap is mass immigration. When I first heard of the attacks in Paris I couldn’t contain my laughter, because an hour or so before I had been watching a TV documentary on WWI where they were telling us what kind of powder-keg the Balkans were because of the mix of religions/cultures.

    It’s just as funny as when you watch Rambo III again, and hear the speech of the colonel Trautman after the US invasion.

    It seems hypocrisy is all the rage in the XXI-st century.

    Nic

    in reply to: General Discussion #237414
    Nicolas10
    Participant

    Legalise it for the police, or the public too?

    In France most cops are armed. Only the local police don’t.

    I actually meant to the public.

    Was your cousin in the police already, or are you thinking of some different branch of the police in the UK?
    An inspector is a rank to achieve via promotion rather than a defining job title.

    I don’t know exactly the job titles in the UK, but my aunt & my uncle told me that he was supposed to begin at a pretty high level right after his training. Not just your average street cop (not that there’s anything wrong with them).

    Nic

    in reply to: To Arm, or not, ??????? #1802866
    Nicolas10
    Participant

    Legalise it for the police, or the public too?

    In France most cops are armed. Only the local police don’t.

    I actually meant to the public.

    Was your cousin in the police already, or are you thinking of some different branch of the police in the UK?
    An inspector is a rank to achieve via promotion rather than a defining job title.

    I don’t know exactly the job titles in the UK, but my aunt & my uncle told me that he was supposed to begin at a pretty high level right after his training. Not just your average street cop (not that there’s anything wrong with them).

    Nic

Viewing 15 posts - 556 through 570 (of 4,147 total)