dark light

Nicolas10

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,081 through 1,095 (of 4,147 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Dassault Rafale, News & Discussion (XV) #2230678
    Nicolas10
    Participant

    Note that the UK has been backing Gripen ever since Eurofighter was eliminated. Why? Well, the radar, & various other important parts . . . . Gripen NG is (in terms of where parts are designed & made) pretty much a Swedish/UK/US joint venture.

    The UK has no interest in doing down France (an important partner in military development) over this. It’s entirely about British industry.

    What a load of bull.

    Nic

    in reply to: Dassault Rafale, News & Discussion (XV) #2232326
    Nicolas10
    Participant

    Just business. Most of the Gripen engine is American, & some other parts, so they’d get some money from it.

    Yeah right… ‘just’ business.

    in reply to: The 'JUST A NICE PIC…' thread #2236640
    Nicolas10
    Participant

    The desert strom camo was also very nice.

    Nic

    in reply to: Dassault Rafale, News & Discussion (XV) #2236696
    Nicolas10
    Participant

    Where’s Nic when we need him, he’s into Conspiracy Theories, isn’t he.

    :dev2:

    I have already voiced my opinion that the gulf states use these contract promises to milk as much political advantage they can from weakish french & britsh governments, once they have milked it enough (fe by managing to have france open a military base in the EAU), they make the same kind of empty promises to the brits. Don’t know what they will get from it, but they will probably get some, and then they’ll probably talk about F35 and see what they can extort from washington.

    The way the french government behave with such countries is appalling. Remember how kadhafi humiliated sarkozy during his visit in Paris for the sale of a token force of Rafales which were never sold anyway? French politicians are slime who bend over at the first occasion.

    Nic

    in reply to: UK Nuclear options – post Scottish independence #2239594
    Nicolas10
    Participant

    You don’t actually equate socialism with communism do you?

    Socialism, at least, the European version of it, and communism are poles apart.

    False

    in reply to: Dassault Rafale, News & Discussion (XV) #2247480
    Nicolas10
    Participant

    It all depends on the load out. An aircraft with a large internal fuel load and internal bays pays a penalty when compared to a clean or very lightly loaded 4th generation jet, but if you compare a Rafale with tanks, bombs, and pods carried externally to an F-35 with an internal load then the F-35 will win easily. Obviously during the course of a mission a 4th generation jet can expect to drop some of it external ordnance/fuel but can be expected to retain things like targeting pods, pylons, CFTs, and at least some missiles.

    I suspect that if the Rafale receives weapons pods they will be retained except in emergency situations, if they are jettisonable at all. This means that the Rafale would be trading aerodynamic performance for stealth, which may make good sense, but the penalty a Rafale (or Super Hornet) would pay to carry a stealthy pod is greater than that of the F-35, which was designed to carry loads internally from the start.

    Trade off that can be erased by dismounting the pods. The fact that you can dismount the pods for all the missions where it is not required and for training means your plane will cost you MUCH less in operating cost over its service life. If only in fuel costs.

    Nic

    in reply to: F-35 News, Multimedia & Discussion thread (2) #2281545
    Nicolas10
    Participant

    Do you really believe that a few dozen F-35s for Israel would make the difference between success & failure for F-35?

    No but I do believe that for the sake of achieving affordable unit cost in the early stage, the US are desperate to sell as many JSF as they can to any foreign customers.

    You’re making the classic conspiracy theorist mistake, of choosing only to consider evidence which supports your thesis, regardless of how much countervailing evidence exists. Anyone can make a case if you make a decision first, then seek evidence to support it. But that case will not be sound. What you should do, if you want to know what’s really going on, is collect evidence first – all you can find – & consider it all, together with all the contextual information you can gather. And that, you are not doing.

    You guys really have problems with the word maybe. People were crying that Israel “bought” the JSF because it’s superduper. I said that maybe, just maybe US aid didn’t come without restrictions. If you want to see conspiracy theories in there I suggest you get a grip.

    Nic

    in reply to: Iran Parades 30 Missiles With Range of 2,000km #1789327
    Nicolas10
    Participant

    Papier mâché comes in handy when some western countries decide to bomb all your stocks.

    Nic

    in reply to: F-35 News, Multimedia & Discussion thread (2) #2281550
    Nicolas10
    Participant

    Remember that Boeing is as good at lobbying as LM, has just as much money, & has very close relations indeed with both certain congresscritters & members of the USAF, & there’s a strong pro-Israel lobby with its own tame politicians. Any conspiracy to force F-35 on Israel would face the opposition of a powerful cabal perfectly capable of cooking up its own conspiracy to push F-15SE on Israel, & a powerful cabal determined to let Israel make its own choice, & willing to use publicity to achieve that aim.

    You are forgetting that LM struck a deal with bank of america under the US government guarantee to avoid bankrupcy. The US gvt would be liable towards bank of america if LM lost money or even folded on such a huge project.

    Nic

    in reply to: F-35 News, Multimedia & Discussion thread (2) #2281586
    Nicolas10
    Participant

    Nicolas10. It would help if you could quote something or someone to support your speculation. perhaps something else they bought where the aid money was only given if that platform was bought

    Do you have any issues with the word maybe? I can’t and won’t prove anything either way and neither can you. Yet you are so sure and when I write “maybe” you’re still unhappy?

    Grow up.

    Nic

    in reply to: F-35 News, Multimedia & Discussion thread (2) #2281601
    Nicolas10
    Participant

    “Can any genius here” you don’t sound too happy, trouble at work?
    so I’m not a buyer if I go to a shop and buy an apple with money from my inheritance.

    Except you don’t know what conditions there are to receive your money. Maybe the amount of military aid is dependant on the purchase or not of a certain fighter which the US desperately have to sell to lower their own costs & to keep the program more or less alive?

    Nic

    in reply to: Advice on Plastic Models? #2281793
    Nicolas10
    Participant

    Well my collection is pretty huge (well over 100 models total…scales 1:144, 1:72, 1:48, and 1:32 primarily…might be another odd scale or two in there), but I’ve been building them since I was a kid, and so even the earliest ones I did, I still have for the most part. The vast majority of my collection is in a pair of huge plastic bins. Recently, I used the third bedroom in my home to make an office or study, and I decided to give it an aviation theme. Kind of a “me” room you know? (Wife gets the rest of the house to decorate so I wanted the one room at least…ha ha)

    Anyways, my current “collection” is now largely what I will hang from the ceiling in that room. I currently have the following (all in 1:48) hanging from my ceiling:

    MiG-29 Fulcrum-A (Russia)
    F/A-18C Hornet (USN)
    Tornado F.3 (RAF)
    Tornado GR.1 (RAF)
    NF-5A Freedom Fighter (Norway)
    MiG-21bis Fishbed-L (Russia)
    F-4F Phantom II (Germany)
    F-102A Delta Dagger (USAF)
    MiG-19S Farmer-C (Russia)
    Hunter F.6 (RAF)
    F-84G Thunderjet (USAF)
    U-2C Dragon Lady (USAF)
    UH-1B Iroquois (U.S. Army)
    Bf-109G (Luftwaffe)
    Bf-110G (Luftwaffe)
    Ju-87D (Luftwaffe)
    P-40C Warhawk (AVG aka Flying Tigers)

    It’s a relatively small room so I don’t really have too much more room, but my next three projects are a Mirage IIICJ, MiG-25 Foxbat, and A-7D Corsair II.

    This post is worthless without pics.

    By the way, if my memory is right, the Flying Tigers never had a P40C. They had P40Bs with some mods that made them virtually like a P40C, but no P40C (although don’t quote me on this because it’s something way back in my memory, and I don’t remember where I’ve read it).

    Nic

    in reply to: US puts brand new C-27Js in boneyard #2282656
    Nicolas10
    Participant

    No, there’s a deficit because the US government spends more than it takes in taxes. Very simple, no need to invent conspiracies.

    The federal reserve system funds itself, just as other central banks do. The private banks which hold stock have to deposit their reserves with the Fed in exchange for it, have no control (no voting rights or any of the other rights associated with ownership) & until 2008 it was illegal for them to get interest on those reserves, & the US govt got the use of that money – but there was still a huge deficit. The Fed isn’t allowed to make profits, so most of the surplus is transferred to the US treasury.

    lol

    in reply to: US puts brand new C-27Js in boneyard #2282714
    Nicolas10
    Participant

    There is a deficit because the PRIVATE banks that constitute the FED actually take a percentage for every dollar it freely prints, & yet another percentage when they loan that dollar they made out of thin air.

    Nic

    in reply to: US puts brand new C-27Js in boneyard #2282775
    Nicolas10
    Participant

    There are a few C27J operators that may have use for them, if only as spares…

    Nic

Viewing 15 posts - 1,081 through 1,095 (of 4,147 total)