dark light

Nicolas10

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,441 through 1,455 (of 4,147 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Profile visitors #2288490
    Nicolas10
    Participant

    I’ve got a few mods in mine 🙁

    Nic

    in reply to: Shenyang J-21/31/F-60/AMF thread part 1 #2288495
    Nicolas10
    Participant

    Congratulations to the chinese!

    I think the shape of the wing makes it look less fat too. It looks pretty much how the F35 should, without the meddling of the F35B requirements.

    I wonder how advanced the chinese are wrt RCS reduction materials.

    Nic

    in reply to: Denmark set to run fighter selection in 2013/4? #2288520
    Nicolas10
    Participant

    Problem being to maintain 2 fleet..a cruel dilemma,in those time of crisis. Maybe combining CAS and training ,or better yet a shared pool of small birds, each participating countries supplying the pilots. That should reduce cost and be less of a dilemma, while being clearly interesting for low intensity actions

    So when your neighbour starts a war your pilots go and fight his war?

    WTF people?

    Is NATO the new comintern or something?

    Nic

    in reply to: Denmark set to run fighter selection in 2013/4? #2288521
    Nicolas10
    Participant

    Whether one agrees with it or not (I don’t — surprise!) it is astonishing the degree to which the notion of ‘NATO ops’ is now advanced as if this is an entirely unremarkable thing, that it is eminently natural that Denmark should plan its force structure around providing moral support for the United States’ global misadventures. What sleight of hand accomplished this unremarked transition for NATO? What forces contrive to sustain it amidst the public failures of the last decade, ongoing fiscal pressure, and the continued absence of anything resembling a real threat?

    +1

    in reply to: Dassault Rafale #14 – News & Discussion #2288711
    Nicolas10
    Participant

    Nicholas10, isn’t this justification after the fact? The French wanted in on a joint european project at the start. In the end it can be said that the Rafale suffered far less from the fact the customer’s requirements were coming from one ministry rather than several.

    Indeed, which is why I am against cooperation, except limited bilateral cooperation projects limited in scope.

    You don’t genuinely think that there is (or was ever) going to be a solely French UCAV do you? Really? I think the same about a UK UCAV (what with sovereignty issues and the nice thought that your country is actually secretly very good at stealth and UAV tech).

    I see no reason not to. Don’t you think BAE could develop Taranis in a good project by themselves? Dassault should be able to develop the Neuron by itself if it was asked to. Since it has the lead of the project I don’t really mind there is cooperation, as long as Dassautl and french industry partners master every technology that is present in it.

    Nic

    in reply to: Denmark set to run fighter selection in 2013/4? #2289043
    Nicolas10
    Participant

    3. If your going to consider mach 1.2 super cruise then you must add the F-35 into the same boat. The plane has marginal super-cruise by your definition.

    And then:

    “What we can do in our airplane is get above the Mach with afterburner, and once you get it going … you can definitely pull the throttle back quite a bit and still maintain supersonic, so technically you’re pretty much at very, very min[imum] afterburner while you’re cruising,” Griffiths said. “So it really does have very good acceleration capabilities up in the air.”

    So the new definition of supercruise is this: Use AB to cross the sound barrier, and maintain a little AB to stay supersonic.

    Rrrrrrrrrrrrrright

    in reply to: Dassault Rafale #14 – News & Discussion #2289049
    Nicolas10
    Participant

    Nicolas, please, keep your personnal opinion about politics for yourself, it’s not the point here.

    It is very much linked to the topic, so I don’t know why I would keep it for myself. I definately won’t just because you say so.

    That negociation with potential customers turn sour every time the french government is involved in the process, while at the same time the brother of your president (who was educated in the US, and who’s son has been studying in a military school in the US) works for an investment fund that basically owns LM is at least very curious.

    The Rafale is the proof that doing a fighter 100% locally to preserve jobs and total independency is not only prossible, but actually gives you a better product than a fighter designed by compromise. So why the hell is all this insistance to cooperate with the UK on UAVs? Do you think Dassault wouldn’t be capable of designing a top notch UCAV? Why do we not take the lesson of the Rafale’s technical success to continue the way that works for our industry and our sovereignty?

    About Marocco, no, it’s not “french governement”, it’s the total disorganisation, lack of cooperation between DA and DGA.
    About India, are you sure you don’t forget the real political cooperation between our two countries ?
    http://www.echoofarunachal.com/?p=4657

    In India there was political support, but the french gvt wasn’t involved in a bilateral negociation process, since the buy was done through a competition. See the difference?

    Nic

    in reply to: Dassault Rafale #14 – News & Discussion #2289282
    Nicolas10
    Participant

    The political involvement for the Indian deal became quite strong after the indian rumors about a Rafale elimination (Indian Prime Minister invited to Bastille day, NS official visit to India, Indian VIP flights in French Air force Rafale, Fench AirForce chief meeting with Indian conterpart…)

    Yeah you’re right there was political involvement in that case too, but definately not to the extent of the UAE or Brazilian contracts.

    Nic

    in reply to: Dassault Rafale #14 – News & Discussion #2289374
    Nicolas10
    Participant

    Are you guys so sure Sarkozy really wanted to sell the Rafale? A lot of noise was made. So much so that it stinks if you ask me. The same way he absolutely had to say that he loved France on his second campaign, because nobody could tell from watching is actions as president.

    At the end of the day:
    – UAE: big involvement from Sarkozy: no deal.
    – Morocco: French goverment ruins what is almost a done deal
    – Brazil: big involvement from Sarkozy: no deal.
    – India: no political involvement: competition won and deal pending.

    Meanwhile, Sarkozy’s brother probably loved it when Morocco bought LM F16s instead of Rafales.
    http://www.carlyle.com/about-carlyle/team/p-olivier-sarkozy

    Nic

    in reply to: Dassault Rafale #14 – News & Discussion #2289692
    Nicolas10
    Participant

    It is less about politic, than trying to put the comment in context.
    Le Drian holds a double language when stating the visit was less about weapon sales , and yet felt compeled to make statement about our weapon export balance to EAU. As the Defense ministry becomes much more prominent in weapon deals , than under prior governement, it is indeed, by the way , one of his attribution to play VRP.
    While the analyzis may be over-simplistic, there is little contesting of the persistence of the “left” to work at limitating the egemony of Dassault, or better taking control . One of the first move of Le Drian by the way , being to reject prior decision favouring Dassault. While at the same time latest drastic change in the organigram of the defense ministry and DGA , smell the witch hunt.

    So no, no politic, nor judgement whether right or wrong , simply trying to put what I consider a somewhat weird communication in perspective

    Make no mistake, this government will try anything it could to strip us for whatever is left of our strategic independance.

    Nic

    in reply to: Netherlands – another chance for Gripen? #2290203
    Nicolas10
    Participant

    Onoes. Pim Fortuyn, Louis Sévèke and Théo Van Gogh died for nothing?

    [/sarcasm]

    Nic

    in reply to: Dassault Rafale #14 – News & Discussion #2290522
    Nicolas10
    Participant

    Heard in the news that this ministraitor said that “the sale of the Rafale to the UAE was not a priority”.

    Nic

    in reply to: Russian vs European aviation industry #2291687
    Nicolas10
    Participant

    Again, Europe is NOT a country!

    in reply to: Russian vs European aviation industry #2291695
    Nicolas10
    Participant

    Yeah… Europe isn’t a country, thank you very much.

    Nic

    in reply to: Russian vs European aviation industry #2291744
    Nicolas10
    Participant

    My 0,02 French Francs.

    fighters – France (PAK-FA may change things we’ll see).
    bombers – Russia
    transports – Russia
    missiles – Draw
    avionics & radar – France
    light helicopters – Europe
    asw helicopters – Europe
    utility helicopters – Draw
    attack helicopters – Russia
    trainers – Draw
    airliners – Europe
    SAM – Russia

    Nic

Viewing 15 posts - 1,441 through 1,455 (of 4,147 total)