dark light

Lightndattic

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 61 through 75 (of 349 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Blackbird clip worth taking a look at. #2499001
    Lightndattic
    Participant

    I saw it in flight 1 time. Luckily it was at dusk when you could still see the plane, but you could REALLY see the AB plume. One of the most amazing things I’ve seen.

    in reply to: An interesting report on where SM-3 is going. #1788612
    Lightndattic
    Participant

    SM-3 could well be going ASAT,

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/7245578.stm

    Suck on that China.:diablo:

    Depending on the max altitude the SM-3 could reach while still having the necessary kinematics to kill the satellite, it might not be. Remember this particular satellite is nearly at entry interface altitude, not in a stable, useful altitude any other satellite would be placed in.

    in reply to: "On Gordon England's personal vendetta to kill the F-22" #2500658
    Lightndattic
    Participant

    Now that Gates has that broken shoulder, Gordon will be attending several SASC meetings on the F-22 and 35. Wonder how this will turn out.

    in reply to: Speculating about the B-3 #2503272
    Lightndattic
    Participant

    I think they still have five; aircraft commander, copilot, EWO, nav, and radar nav. Why the navs and EWOs aren’t dual-qualified like the B-1’s WSOs are, is another story…

    PBAR

    Correct on the B-52 crew members. The tail gunner MOS was discontinued ~93 IIRC. I do know 0 H models arrived at Barksdale with guns in the tails. Several neighbors when I lived at Barksdale were gunners and either left the service or retrained, mostly to loadmasters so they could keep flight pay.

    The extra seat is still installed and used for IP’s or relief pilot on ferry missions (Diego or Guam).

    in reply to: 1st F-35B nozzle test video. #2506591
    Lightndattic
    Participant

    I remember seeing early publication saying it could rotate ~92-93 degrees, so slights reverse thrust is possible, mainly for slight position adjustment in hover, not braking while transitioning into hover.

    in reply to: S-400 TRIUMF for Greece? #1789112
    Lightndattic
    Participant

    I wonder how these Russian defense systems show on their western aircraft’s radar warning receivers? Does it show as a hostile site or friendly?

    in reply to: Japanese Apache AH-64D #2531964
    Lightndattic
    Participant

    Zulu Cobra, anyone?

    in reply to: Nice video of a couple of B-1s in afterburner at dusk. #2538483
    Lightndattic
    Participant

    I wonder why the first one was jockey-ing the throttles like that and why the second one was in burner for so long. I’ve seen Bones take off and even seen an alert scramble from Dyess, but never seen one stay in blower for that long. It would make sense if they were going from Nellis to Pasadena for the Rose Bowl flyover since that’s just a quick hop and they would be fat on fuel.

    The only more impressive AB display I’ve ever seen was in 88 or 89 when the SR-71 visited Barksdale for the Proud Shield symposium. He did a low pass and lit them off. The flames seemed to be 100ft long to my 12 year old eyes.

    in reply to: Soviet F111 equivalent #2539172
    Lightndattic
    Participant

    Wow… First mention of Su-34 to toilet comment = 7 posts. A new record. 😀

    I think performance aside, basing it strictly on looks, the Su-24 is the F-111 equivalent. Tu-22M is what the proposed FB-111H (stretched, max weight increase, etc.) was supposed to be.

    in reply to: Soviet F111 equivalent #2541585
    Lightndattic
    Participant

    If the Soviet Shuttle was a copy of the US shuttle why was the Soviet shuttle 20 tons lighter?

    You said it yourself. The Buran didn’t have it’s own launch propulsion engines. All the energy for launch comes from the Energyia.

    Imagine the size of the components the ISS could be made of if the Buran was operational?

    Don’t you mean “if Energyia was used to launch the components instead of Proton rockets with later Shuttle add-ons?”. Correct me if I’m wrong, but the Buran cargo hold was of a similar volume to the shuttle’s was it not? Sure it could carry more weight on launch because it didn’t have to lift it’s own engines, but the size of objects carried would be similar.

    in reply to: F-117 Developments #2549539
    Lightndattic
    Participant

    I am sure I remember reading somewhere that the F-117 had no flaps. That combined with the angle of its wings must have meant an extremely high landing speed. Certainly way too high for a carrier approach. Anyone know for sure ?

    From my experience seeing them take off and land, it’s it a fast, flat approach and departure. I couldn’t imagine the work it would take to make an aircraft that was cobbled together with as many parts from other aircraft as possible to build it as quickly and quietly as possible and make it carrier capable.

    in reply to: Low avelability of Dutch F-16 #2551482
    Lightndattic
    Participant

    I’d look like this:
    http://image2.sina.com.cn/jc/2005-03-21/U28P27T1D274527F3DT20050321075829.jpg
    😀

    I’ve always thought the F-15 needed a second underwing pylon. One what could carry real ordinance, not just an ECM pod. Just look at all that wasted space.

    in reply to: B-1B ferry flight to Fairford. #2554730
    Lightndattic
    Participant

    Wow… that’s dicey. Nice save, though.

    in reply to: Rusty Raptor #2504374
    Lightndattic
    Participant

    If only others could see it this way.:diablo:

    It doesn’t suit their purposes to see it this way.:rolleyes:

    in reply to: F110s for RSAF's F-15S #2505201
    Lightndattic
    Participant

    Maybe its because of the cfm6 core?

    That’s a little misleading since the F-110 and CFM-56 both are developed from the core of the F-101 used on the B-1B.

Viewing 15 posts - 61 through 75 (of 349 total)