Dunkirk trailer now online
https://youtu.be/F-eMt3SrfFU
Is G-FXII EN224?
Andy
It is indeed. Very much looking forward to seeing this one in the air.
Another fantastic example of the work done at Meier Motors.
Supremely jealous of anyone lucky enough to get a back seat ride.
Radio-controlled?
The production have produced an assortment of large RC models of Stukas, Spitfires and Messerschmitts (Buchons).
Stuka model pictured on set in France. Hope they didn’t pay $5m for that, would have expected something a bit more substantial for that money.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-3636848/Kenneth-Branagh-seen-uniform-set-new-movie-Dunkirk-surrounded-explosions-filming-battle-scenes-underway-time.html
The usual Mail inaccuracies confusing the ‘Yakfire’ for a Spitfire, calling them fighter jets etc.
Good to know I wasn’t the only one terrified as an 8 year old of the Heinkel’s gunner’s goggles being sprayed with tomato sauce. Still not sure how the front gunner is hit when the Spitfire is shown swooping from behind…
Best war movies in my opinion in no particular order;
Stalag 17
12 o’clock high
The Cruel Sea
Saving Private Ryan (purely for the first half hour)
Schindler’s List
Lawrence of Arabia
The Pianist
The Longest Day
Platoon
Apocalypse Now
Come and See
Paths of Glory
Das Boot
The Dambusters
Battle of Britain
I see people are already getting their knickers in a twist and dismissing the film already.
I think people have taken that picture of an Fw 190 too literally. We certainly won’t be seeing one of those in the finished production. And again people getting upset because they think the Yak will be playing a Spitfire.
Considering the production is using 2 Mk. I’s and a Buchon, I think they at least a little bit of credit. Or at least for people to wait to see the finished movie before drawing their knives.
On my few visits to Hendon I have always been sad to note the abscence of information about the history of many of the airframes shown in front of them. They give no credit to the efforts of the many who saved them and leave most of the public poorly informed about preservation. Yes I know the info is all there on line but thats no use to a casual visitor.
Entirely agree. I was not aware that the Ju88 ended up in Allied hands after it was flown to Scotland by two defectors and another not so cooperative crew member, until after my visit.
I agree that the hall could have done with some updating but I am greatly disappointed/upset to find it is closing. I too was under the impression when I visited earlier this year that the aircraft were only undergoing inspection. It feels they have been a little disingenious if this is the case. Especially when they have posted the likes of this on YouTube https://youtu.be/nq0era2R_zk
3) None of the film aircraft had machine guns actually fitted in the nose perspex. But photos of the real 1943 ‘Memphis Belle’ shows two 0.50s mounted at different positions in the nose perspex. I have also seen photos of some B-17Fs with twin machine guns projecting from the exact centre of the nose perspex. Were either of these factory modifications or were they done in the field? Also did the twin mount use 50s or 30s?
I think the mounting for extra nose guns was included on certain productions of the B17 at a factory level.
However the twin gun modification were done in the field usually utilising 50 calibres.
A gorgeous addition to the Spitfire fraternity.
“Much of it soon deterioriated. Some bits were taken to East Essex Aviation Society Museum and Point Clear and some have found a resting place in homes on Mersea Island.”
I do not know whether he will return.
That is disappointing for a number of reasons, the main being that the forum can only be a lesser place without his knowledge. I hope certain posters are content with themselves.
Beautiful pics of yellow 10
Oh my…..think I’m going to have to find another image hosting site