dark light

aerospacetech

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 601 through 615 (of 1,127 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: F/A-22 Cockpit Displays (from Lockheed video) #2681661
    aerospacetech
    Participant

    djnik
    I am just wondering,how can the radar deduce what type of aircraft and what type of SAM it is?

    The display is a tactical display, fusing radar, RWR, AWACS, other F/A-22s information.

    The radar can certainly tell the aircraft type on its own however.

    in reply to: F/A-22 Cockpit Displays (from Lockheed video) #2681665
    aerospacetech
    Participant

    Situational analysis
    http://www.overscan.co.nz/efa-mhdd1.gif

    Hydraulic system
    http://www.overscan.co.nz/efa-mhdd2.gif

    Weapons Control
    http://www.overscan.co.nz/efa-mhdd3.gif

    Radio navigation
    http://www.overscan.co.nz/efa-mhdd4.gif

    Engine status
    http://www.overscan.co.nz/efa-mhdd5.gif

    Radar display
    http://www.overscan.co.nz/efa-mhdd6.gif

    Radar display, elevation mode
    http://www.overscan.co.nz/efa-mhdd7.gif
    http://www.overscan.co.nz/efa-mhdd12.gif

    Mapping mode
    http://www.overscan.co.nz/efa-mhdd9.gif

    System startup
    http://www.overscan.co.nz/efa-mhdd8.gif

    Landing assistance
    http://www.overscan.co.nz/efa-mhdd13.gif

    Airfield map
    http://www.overscan.co.nz/efa-mhdd13.gif

    Failure of engine gearbox
    http://www.overscan.co.nz/efa-mhdd15.gif
    http://www.overscan.co.nz/efa-mhdd16.gif

    Display pics from http://www.airpower.at

    in reply to: F/A-22 Cockpit Displays (from Lockheed video) #2681670
    aerospacetech
    Participant

    HUD display:

    http://www.overscan.co.nz/efa-hud1.gif
    http://www.overscan.co.nz/efa-hud2.gif

    in reply to: F/A-22 Cockpit Displays (from Lockheed video) #2681674
    aerospacetech
    Participant

    OK here’s some Typhoon stuff to compare!

    First the overall cockpit

    http://www.overscan.co.nz/typhooncockpit.jpg

    in reply to: F/A-22 Cockpit Displays (from Lockheed video) #2681770
    aerospacetech
    Participant

    Cockpit Display Symbology

    The tactical information shown on the displays is all intuitive to the pilot—he can tell the situation around him by a glance at the screen. Enemy aircraft are shown as red triangles, friendly aircraft are green circles, unknown aircraft are shown as yellow squares, and wingmen are shown as blue F-22s. Surface-to-air missile sites are represented by pentagons (along with an indication of exactly what type missile it is) and its lethal range. In addition to shape and color, the symbols are further refined. A filled-in triangle means that the pilot has a missile firing-quality solution against the target, while an open triangle is not a firing-quality solution. The pilot has a cursor on each screen, and he can ask the aircraft’s avionics system to retrieve more information. The system can determine to a 98% probability the target’s type of aircraft. If the system can’t make an identification to that degree, the aircraft is shown as an unknown.

    in reply to: Strange pod on Su-30MK #2682195
    aerospacetech
    Participant

    Thanks PiBu.

    I think the actual Su-30MK put the SPO-32 Pastel internally to replace the SPO-15, and used the pod-mounted Sorbstiya or Gardeniya making this pod redundant.

    in reply to: Soviet/Russian Oddball designs #2683670
    aerospacetech
    Participant

    I think the canard delta Su-37 (first of that name) might be another Sh-90 concept.

    There was also a requirement for an prop-based observation aircraft, emanating from Afgan experience, which some of the stuff on the previous page could be from.

    Piotr Butowski mentions two Tupolev flying wings, Tu-202 and Tu-404. There was also the hypersonic Tu-260/360 designs (Mach 4/Mach 6), Mikoyan 301/321 etc, all of which are recce/bomber designs.

    in reply to: TSR-2 would it have been any good? #2684203
    aerospacetech
    Participant

    Well, TSR.2 was designed for exactly the sort of mission that the Tornado filled.

    What were the potential problems with it? Well, the airframe was pretty good, the engines worked well enough.

    I think that the avionics fit was pretty ambitious and might well have proved troublesome.

    The aircraft’s electronics were complex and varied but almost completely new. The navigation system was based on a doppler / inertial system that was updated by the radar. The nose radar was for weapon delivery and terrain following, while the sideways-looking radars could be matched against maps to aid navigation. All data output was fed into the central computer which governed the flight of the aircraft via the automatic control system. The TSR-2 could also be equipped with a comprehensive reconnaissance set-up which could be aided by the sideways-looking radar.

    A better approach would have been to be less ambitious with the first version, maybe use some existing systems, with the intention of developing later upgraded versions.

    in reply to: The ones that never made it #2684288
    aerospacetech
    Participant
    in reply to: Soviet/Russian Oddball designs #2684425
    aerospacetech
    Participant

    The B-2 had the same configuration early on so maybe the KGB/GRU managed to get some information 😉

    in reply to: Soviet/Russian Oddball designs #2684613
    aerospacetech
    Participant

    A couple of Mikoyan MiG AT projects

    in reply to: Soviet/Russian Oddball designs #2685091
    aerospacetech
    Participant

    Mi-42:

    in reply to: Soviet/Russian Oddball designs #2685094
    aerospacetech
    Participant

    Mi-30:

    in reply to: Soviet/Russian Oddball designs #2685122
    aerospacetech
    Participant

    The V-50 is very Thunderbirds if you ask me…

    in reply to: Soviet/Russian Oddball designs #2685130
    aerospacetech
    Participant

    Ka-40 (the Ka-27 replacement)

Viewing 15 posts - 601 through 615 (of 1,127 total)