djnik
I am just wondering,how can the radar deduce what type of aircraft and what type of SAM it is?
The display is a tactical display, fusing radar, RWR, AWACS, other F/A-22s information.
The radar can certainly tell the aircraft type on its own however.
Situational analysis
Hydraulic system
Weapons Control
Radio navigation
Engine status
Radar display
Radar display, elevation mode

Mapping mode
System startup
Landing assistance
Airfield map
Failure of engine gearbox

Display pics from http://www.airpower.at
HUD display:


OK here’s some Typhoon stuff to compare!
First the overall cockpit

Cockpit Display Symbology
The tactical information shown on the displays is all intuitive to the pilot—he can tell the situation around him by a glance at the screen. Enemy aircraft are shown as red triangles, friendly aircraft are green circles, unknown aircraft are shown as yellow squares, and wingmen are shown as blue F-22s. Surface-to-air missile sites are represented by pentagons (along with an indication of exactly what type missile it is) and its lethal range. In addition to shape and color, the symbols are further refined. A filled-in triangle means that the pilot has a missile firing-quality solution against the target, while an open triangle is not a firing-quality solution. The pilot has a cursor on each screen, and he can ask the aircraft’s avionics system to retrieve more information. The system can determine to a 98% probability the target’s type of aircraft. If the system can’t make an identification to that degree, the aircraft is shown as an unknown.
Thanks PiBu.
I think the actual Su-30MK put the SPO-32 Pastel internally to replace the SPO-15, and used the pod-mounted Sorbstiya or Gardeniya making this pod redundant.
I think the canard delta Su-37 (first of that name) might be another Sh-90 concept.
There was also a requirement for an prop-based observation aircraft, emanating from Afgan experience, which some of the stuff on the previous page could be from.
Piotr Butowski mentions two Tupolev flying wings, Tu-202 and Tu-404. There was also the hypersonic Tu-260/360 designs (Mach 4/Mach 6), Mikoyan 301/321 etc, all of which are recce/bomber designs.
Well, TSR.2 was designed for exactly the sort of mission that the Tornado filled.
What were the potential problems with it? Well, the airframe was pretty good, the engines worked well enough.
I think that the avionics fit was pretty ambitious and might well have proved troublesome.
The aircraft’s electronics were complex and varied but almost completely new. The navigation system was based on a doppler / inertial system that was updated by the radar. The nose radar was for weapon delivery and terrain following, while the sideways-looking radars could be matched against maps to aid navigation. All data output was fed into the central computer which governed the flight of the aircraft via the automatic control system. The TSR-2 could also be equipped with a comprehensive reconnaissance set-up which could be aided by the sideways-looking radar.
A better approach would have been to be less ambitious with the first version, maybe use some existing systems, with the intention of developing later upgraded versions.
The B-2 had the same configuration early on so maybe the KGB/GRU managed to get some information 😉
A couple of Mikoyan MiG AT projects
Mi-42:
Mi-30:
The V-50 is very Thunderbirds if you ask me…
Ka-40 (the Ka-27 replacement)