The AL-21F-3 was an advanced turbojet design. Its only real failings compared to the AL-31F are higher fuel consumption (though rather better than the R-29-300 series) and greater weight.
Originally posted by flex297
Interesting.. Then I must have run into some unreliable source… Thanks, I stand corrected..
Well, you are correct that the Russians gathered substantial info on the RB199, but they also had detailed information on the US F100 engine and probably others too. This information undoubtedly helped, but the RD-33 is not directly related to the RB199.
RD-33 owes nothing directly to the RB199.
RD-33 is a two spool turbofan with a low bypass ratio. If it is inspired by anything it would be the YJ-101 that became the F404.
RB199 is a three spool turbofan with a medium bypass ratio. Very different.
There WAS an RB199 inspired engine designed. It was the Tumansky R67-300, a three spool turbofan rated at 7,500kg thrust. It lost out to the RD-33.
6 were left working in Russia, but they got some from Ukraine (no more left- the rest were scrapped) and they are supposed to be getting another 3 (left partially built at the collapse of the USSR)from the factory. I think its about 15 operational?
For the benefit of those of us who don’t read Chinese- what does it say?
The dorsal tank will be removable, in the fashionable style.
Bear in mind the MiG-29K will already have a lot more fuel onboard than the basic MiG-29.
01- Mikhail Gromov (Famous test pilot)
02- Vasiliy Reshetnikov (Former Long- range Aviation commander)
03- Pavel Taran (WW2 Bomber pilot)
04- Ivan Yarygin (Famous wrestler, won gold at 1972 Olympics)
05- Originally Il’ya Muromets, now Aleksandr Golovanov (Long- range Aviation commander, 1942-44 and 1946-48)
06- Il’ya Muromets
07- Aleksadr Molodchiy (famous WW2 bomber pilot)
11- Vasiliy Sen’ko (only Long- range Aviation navigator to become Hero of the Soviet Union twice)
12- Aleksandr Novikov (1940s Air Chief Marshal)
16- Aleksey Plokhov (WW2 Bomber pilot)
These are all the named examples I know of- not all Tu-160s have been named.
There are more than 6 operational – it was 15 a while back, though 1 has crashed since then- but I think 3 more were being completed?
Oh thats the one. In that case, I’d love a voucher.
Please, please, please….
🙂
Email me:
[email]avionics@overscan.co.uk[/email]
There has never been any evidence that the USSR had physical access to Tomcats and Phoenixes. In fact, the head of Vympel specifically denied seeing a Phoenix when he happily admitted to reverse engineering both Sidewinder and Sparrow.
They *did* have a lot of spies, however. They got detailed information on the F-15’s F100 engine that sent them up the garden path, changing the AL-31s configuration to resemble it, only to find it didn’t work at all well. Lyulka had to borrow the compressor design (scaled up) from the RD-33 to get back on track.
They also got detailed info on the APG-65, too late to influence the N019 and N001 but it probably proved useful when designing “Zhuk”…
I worked at Aerospace Publishing for 2 weeks (work experience) and I can say that they really put a lot of work into WAPJ. It was their baby- all the other work they did was just earning money regurgitating stuff they’d done already. I worked on a section of a larger book by another company, doing first flights by year, and I couldn’t use ANY photos except from their stock library, for cost reasons. WAPJ was always full of original photographs- it must have been quite expensive to put together…
TUPOLEV BOMBERS for £9.99 sounds quite tempting.
Is the Tu-16 section the decent article from IAPR 9 or an older WAPJ effort?
In a phone interview from a Virgina hotel room, Baskar claims that he has “60 people in the company.” But when pressed, he admits that all but three “are essentially assisting on a pro bono basis.”
Hey did you notice they only want hard currency?
Wonder why… 😉
Concentrating upon the value added resale of pipe band percussion products, Stavatti can address all your pipe band drumming needs!
Mikoyan “33” project