dark light

aerospacetech

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 796 through 810 (of 1,127 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: How much do the Russians know about USAF aircraft? #2696769
    aerospacetech
    Participant

    The AL-21F-3 was an advanced turbojet design. Its only real failings compared to the AL-31F are higher fuel consumption (though rather better than the R-29-300 series) and greater weight.

    in reply to: How much do the Russians know about USAF aircraft? #2696773
    aerospacetech
    Participant

    Originally posted by flex297
    Interesting.. Then I must have run into some unreliable source… Thanks, I stand corrected..

    Well, you are correct that the Russians gathered substantial info on the RB199, but they also had detailed information on the US F100 engine and probably others too. This information undoubtedly helped, but the RD-33 is not directly related to the RB199.

    in reply to: How much do the Russians know about USAF aircraft? #2696787
    aerospacetech
    Participant

    RD-33 owes nothing directly to the RB199.

    RD-33 is a two spool turbofan with a low bypass ratio. If it is inspired by anything it would be the YJ-101 that became the F404.

    RB199 is a three spool turbofan with a medium bypass ratio. Very different.

    There WAS an RB199 inspired engine designed. It was the Tumansky R67-300, a three spool turbofan rated at 7,500kg thrust. It lost out to the RD-33.

    in reply to: Tu-160 names #2696885
    aerospacetech
    Participant

    6 were left working in Russia, but they got some from Ukraine (no more left- the rest were scrapped) and they are supposed to be getting another 3 (left partially built at the collapse of the USSR)from the factory. I think its about 15 operational?

    in reply to: J-10 MASS Production Starts. #2696906
    aerospacetech
    Participant

    For the benefit of those of us who don’t read Chinese- what does it say?

    in reply to: Some Indian Gorshkov details.. #2696947
    aerospacetech
    Participant

    The dorsal tank will be removable, in the fashionable style.

    Bear in mind the MiG-29K will already have a lot more fuel onboard than the basic MiG-29.

    in reply to: Tu-160 names #2696949
    aerospacetech
    Participant

    01- Mikhail Gromov (Famous test pilot)

    02- Vasiliy Reshetnikov (Former Long- range Aviation commander)

    03- Pavel Taran (WW2 Bomber pilot)

    04- Ivan Yarygin (Famous wrestler, won gold at 1972 Olympics)

    05- Originally Il’ya Muromets, now Aleksandr Golovanov (Long- range Aviation commander, 1942-44 and 1946-48)

    06- Il’ya Muromets

    07- Aleksadr Molodchiy (famous WW2 bomber pilot)

    11- Vasiliy Sen’ko (only Long- range Aviation navigator to become Hero of the Soviet Union twice)

    12- Aleksandr Novikov (1940s Air Chief Marshal)

    16- Aleksey Plokhov (WW2 Bomber pilot)

    These are all the named examples I know of- not all Tu-160s have been named.

    There are more than 6 operational – it was 15 a while back, though 1 has crashed since then- but I think 3 more were being completed?

    in reply to: "Russian Military Aviation Directory" Airtime !?! #2697065
    aerospacetech
    Participant

    Oh thats the one. In that case, I’d love a voucher.

    Please, please, please….

    🙂

    Email me:

    [email]avionics@overscan.co.uk[/email]

    in reply to: How much do the Russians know about USAF aircraft? #2697068
    aerospacetech
    Participant

    There has never been any evidence that the USSR had physical access to Tomcats and Phoenixes. In fact, the head of Vympel specifically denied seeing a Phoenix when he happily admitted to reverse engineering both Sidewinder and Sparrow.

    They *did* have a lot of spies, however. They got detailed information on the F-15’s F100 engine that sent them up the garden path, changing the AL-31s configuration to resemble it, only to find it didn’t work at all well. Lyulka had to borrow the compressor design (scaled up) from the RD-33 to get back on track.

    They also got detailed info on the APG-65, too late to influence the N019 and N001 but it probably proved useful when designing “Zhuk”…

    in reply to: "Russian Military Aviation Directory" Airtime !?! #2697074
    aerospacetech
    Participant

    I worked at Aerospace Publishing for 2 weeks (work experience) and I can say that they really put a lot of work into WAPJ. It was their baby- all the other work they did was just earning money regurgitating stuff they’d done already. I worked on a section of a larger book by another company, doing first flights by year, and I couldn’t use ANY photos except from their stock library, for cost reasons. WAPJ was always full of original photographs- it must have been quite expensive to put together…

    in reply to: "Russian Military Aviation Directory" Airtime !?! #2697076
    aerospacetech
    Participant

    TUPOLEV BOMBERS for £9.99 sounds quite tempting.

    Is the Tu-16 section the decent article from IAPR 9 or an older WAPJ effort?

    in reply to: Stavatti planes #2697343
    aerospacetech
    Participant

    In a phone interview from a Virgina hotel room, Baskar claims that he has “60 people in the company.” But when pressed, he admits that all but three “are essentially assisting on a pro bono basis.”

    in reply to: Stavatti planes #2697394
    aerospacetech
    Participant

    Hey did you notice they only want hard currency?

    Wonder why… 😉

    in reply to: Stavatti planes #2697415
    aerospacetech
    Participant

    Concentrating upon the value added resale of pipe band percussion products, Stavatti can address all your pipe band drumming needs!

    http://www.stavatti.com/diversified/percussion.html

    in reply to: what ifs: China and the MiG-29 #2697525
    aerospacetech
    Participant

    Mikoyan “33” project

Viewing 15 posts - 796 through 810 (of 1,127 total)