Jackehammond, check pms.
Sergei Burdin was working on a book on MiG-25R. Some materials can be found online here:
http://www.airforce.ru/aircraft/mikoyan/mig-25rb/index.htm
At present, I believe the book is shelved.
Looks like a poor machine translation from Russian to English to me.
Pirate has kinematic ranging…
the new English-language edition of Ildar Bedretdinov’s Su-27 book (4kg!) to pack in my suitcase.
Ken, what do you think of it?
Um, Sean, the Tomcat comparison in MiG-31 FRA is lifted directly from Fedosov’s (GosNIAAS) Russian language book on Air Defence Technologies. So really it could done with a lot more “work”….
I think the point Scott is making is that Skat is currently a mockup, not a working aircraft, hence its somewhat premature to say
“Well, well, looks like the Russians enter the stealth scene at the level of X-45 & B2- good for them!!”
As Otaku did a few posts ago.
Theres a big difference between a static model and a working stealth aircraft. Otherwise Iran could build a Revell plastic B-2 model and claim to have mastered stealth aircraft production.
I’m not finished reading it but I think it could be my favourite so far….
The core of Tactical Missile Corp is Zvezda-Strela. However:
On May 9, 2004 the President of the Russian Federation signed a decree #591 on development Tactical Missiles Corporation JSC, under which the Corporation included the following 8 defense enterprises:
•Federal State Unitary Enterprise “The Bereznyak State engineering design bureau Raduga” (Dubna, Moscow region);
•Federal State Unitary Enterprise “Production association Azov optomechanical plant” (Azov, Rostov region);
•Federal State Unitary Enterprise “The State scientific and production enterprise Region” (Moscow);
•Federal State Unitary Enterprise “Design engineering bureau” (Moscow);
•Federal State Unitary Enterprise “The Toropov State design bureau Vimpel” (Moscow);
•Smolensk aircraft plant JSC;
•Salyut JSC (Samara);
•Gorizont JSC (Moscow).
Having said that, Kh-38M is a Zvezda product. It looks a bit like a scaled down Kh-35.
Day 2
Su-35 more pics added
http://www.secretprojects.co.uk/forum/index.php/topic,2328.msg19661.html#msg19661
MiG-29K detail shots
http://www.secretprojects.co.uk/forum/index.php/topic,2336
Tu-144 interior shots
http://www.secretprojects.co.uk/forum/index.php/topic,2337.msg19666/topicseen.html#msg19666
http://www.secretprojects.co.uk/forum/index.php/topic,585.msg19620.html
31 pics taken today by “flateric” at MAKS
http://www.secretprojects.co.uk/forum/index.php/topic,2328.15.html
Now with 96 pics taken today by “flateric”.
More importantly, I drew the original sketch as a purely hypothetical MFI class fighter and Matej drew a better sketch from that drawing. So unless I am *very* lucky its entirely nothing to do with PAK-FA.
I’ve not heard any official plans about restarting development. The initial testing went very badly if I recall correctly.
More pics once the public are allowed in…
This is very shortsighted thinking. First – IR R-27 is likely to be used in a tailchase engagement. Missile ranges are much shorter in tailchase as they must overtake the target.
Also, the engagement might be lower altitude, which reduces missile range further.
R-27T range in such conditions might only be 10km or so, well within lockon range. R-27ET range would be substantially longer.
R-27R does lock on after launch, by design. However, R-27ER typical max range is 65km, not 120km.