3rd:
more:
Northrop’s proposal has never been shown to my knowledge, but it was probably similar to this fighter design seen in a patent application:
last one of Rockwell’s ATF:
Another one of Rockwells design
Rockwell’s ATF proposal was a “stealthy” version of the following:
Pic of the McDonnell-Douglas ATF:
This is McDonnell-Douglas’s ATF proposal:
The first is the Boeing ATF design (side view below) and the second is the General Dynamics ATF design.
The Boeing design was considered “excellent” but Lockheed had a better plan and track record in Stealth.
Re: Re: Re: Cope India – 2004
Originally posted by Arthur
And not just a Russian IFF system, but an OLD Russian IFF system. Aerospacetech/Overscan will definately know better, but i thought the old SRO-1 systems had the Odd Rods. Newer SRO-2 Khrom-Nikel IFF sets have a small blade antenna.Well noticed by the way, Ken. Modelling-trained eyesight 😉
Well, ‘oddly enough’ the baseline Su-27 series, even in Russia, has always used the older “Odd Rods” style antenna rather than the newer blade style antenna. The Su-34 and Su-35 have blade antennas.
The Russian IFF systems remain a bit of a mystery, I’m afraid, but I assume that the SU-27 must have had the newer “Parol” IFF system which was used since the late 70s (the ‘Belenko’ effect). Perhaps the physical antenna shape (blade/rods) is not related to the actual IFF equipment inside?
Maybe inside the triangle blade is the 3 “Odd Rods” as of old?
The Chinese IFF system is an derivative of the SRO system but not identical, while Indian MKIs use an Indian system.
comparision of RFP and Dem/Val proposals
Concepts studied:
F-22 evolution:
variations on a theme:
all 3 f-22 team proposals: