dark light

Archer

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 391 through 405 (of 1,614 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Dunkirk film – Merged For General Updates And Chat #848219
    Archer
    Participant

    I’ve just translated what it says in the document, the official term is RPAS of course…;)

    in reply to: Dunkirk film – Merged For General Updates And Chat #848241
    Archer
    Participant

    There is a bit of video from a Dutch TV program here: http://www.nu.nl/35828/video/schipper-geeft-cruise-langs-hollywood-filmset-urk.html
    They go along with a local entrepeneur who will be offering a ‘filmset cruise’ to interested parties. From 0:16 on there are shots of a GRP Spitfire with ‘LC’ codes and marked ‘R9649’.
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]246620[/ATTACH]
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]246621[/ATTACH]

    Edit: The document linked to before states that the following aircraft will be used:
    – Mk.I Spitfires G-AIST and G-CGUK
    – Mk.V Spitfire G-CISV
    – Buchon HA 1112 M1L G-AWHK
    – Blenheim G-BPIV
    – Yak-52TW N699DP
    – Two helicopters, AS350 G-WHST and AS355 G-OHCP (or similar replacement helicopters)
    – 50 light unmanned aircraft

    in reply to: Dunkirk film – Merged For General Updates And Chat #848718
    Archer
    Participant

    According to an article in last weekend’s newspaper, a (replica) Spitfire might be launched by a catapult to portray a ditching.

    Edit: According to the paperwork the movie is called ‘Bodega Bay’. Nothing for us to get excited about then…:highly_amused:

    in reply to: Red Arrows and Farborough #849944
    Archer
    Participant

    I was passing along the M3 during a Farnborough show a few years back and because of the slow-moving traffic got to enjoy an extensive display by the Red Arrows. What I remember though is that they primarily changed the formation shape everytime they crossed overhead my car, there didn’t seem to be any vertical manouvres within the display. I cannot remember if the weather was the culprit on that day but with the proximity of airliners above and houses nearby, the decision to use a similar show this year does not surprise me. Are we sure that this decision is in fact linked to Shoreham? Or is that perhaps a conclusion drawn by the media?

    in reply to: You Can fly The Martin Mars…. #850237
    Archer
    Participant

    If only…. (runs off to buy a lottery ticket)

    in reply to: P.51 crash, G-CGOI, 2015. #850459
    Archer
    Participant

    The AAIB bulletin is an interesting read, to me it sounds a lot like a situation where the pilot wasn’t able to control the swings associated with flying a relatively powerful taildragger.

    Archer
    Participant

    The Spit is actually a Mk.IX, MK732. Nice footage indeed!

    in reply to: Pampa's thread about Dutch Fokkers #851930
    Archer
    Participant

    Thanks Mathieu, your post confirmed a couple of stories that I had picked up at some point but couldn’t quite put together. The replica is still a great achievement but it is good to know where the differences are between this and the original aircraft. I know I picked up on the undercarriage differences when building a model of a D.XXI years and years ago….

    in reply to: Pampa's thread about Dutch Fokkers #852749
    Archer
    Participant

    Great photo Jur! I did hear a rumour at some point that although Fokker used the original drawings, they may have used the wrong ones for some bits. One thing that always struck me was that the undercarriage legs looked somewhat more spindly in period photos. Does anyone know more about this?

    in reply to: Pampa's thread about Dutch Fokkers #853165
    Archer
    Participant

    Some photos can be seen here ( page 4, 6 and 7) http://www.nederlandseluchtvaart.nl/forums/showthread.php?37317-PH-XXI-Fokker-D-XXI-replica/page4

    Thanks for the heads up about that one! Two years ago I saw the Fokker C.X replica that they had built (static only unfortunately) and I saw the engine and prop that was going to be used on the D.XXI. It is amazing to see how far they have come since!

    in reply to: Pampa's thread about Dutch Fokkers #853352
    Archer
    Participant

    There are some photos in this thread as well: http://forum.keypublishing.com/showthread.php?65873-Harvard-film-roles but as they are in black & white I cannot tell if the fin flashes are the right way round!

    in reply to: Pampa's thread about Dutch Fokkers #853367
    Archer
    Participant

    Those Harvards played several roles. They were D.XXIs for the movie ‘Soldaat van Oranje’:
    http://i209.photobucket.com/albums/bb258/huntert66a/141%20EHDL%20280688%20Fred%20Goth.jpg

    But also FW-190s for the movie ‘Soldaat van Oranje’:
    http://i209.photobucket.com/albums/bb258/huntert66a/1135831F.jpg

    Hawker Tempest (for ‘A Bridge Too Far’):
    http://i209.photobucket.com/albums/bb258/huntert66a/1524_4313168_1.jpg

    And P-47s:
    http://forum.keypublishing.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=148771&d=1166125571

    in reply to: Visit to the Biggin Hill Heritage Hangar #854176
    Archer
    Participant

    A quick search found this history for BAF SG-25 on a Belgian forum:

    Spitfire FR.14e RM927 c/n 6S.381758
    Supermarine Aviation (Vickers) Ltd. – Contract B980385/39 (tenth order for 406 Spitfire Mk.VIII dated 231043, but built as Spitfire Mk.XIV in november 44 with a Griffon 65 engine)
    211144 RAF N° 30 MU Sealand
    021244 RAF N° 39 MU Colerne
    060145 RAF N° 83 Group Support Unit of 2nd TAF, Westhampnett, Suxxes
    250145 RAF N° 403 (RCAF) Sqn
    090345 Cat.B damage during operations
    150345 RAF N° 409 R&SU (repairs, but damage was beyond their capabilities)
    040545 Air Service Training Ltd, Hamble for repairs
    180945 repairs completed
    011145 RAF N° 29 MU, High Ercall for storage
    141147 selected for BAF and flown to ARS/Wevelgem still wearing RAF c/s OI-C of n° 2 Squadron.
    141147 Taken on Charge
    1147 Delivered to 161W-351Sqn
    010248 To 2W-1Sqn, Florennes (3R-D)
    0248 To Ecole de Chasse, Koksijde (IQ-)
    280749 Major inspection
    210450 To 2W-3Sqn (YL-)
    170550 Minor inspection
    110550 Cat.1 at Florennes (16h45): Taxi collision with parked SG-60. Sgt. Victor Depauw unhurt.
    160650 To 2W-1Sqn (3R-A)
    200650 Cat.3 at Koksijde (3R-A) (15h45): Blown tire on landing. Aircraft got off runway. Left wing
    and u/c leg to be replaced. Maj. Léon Vandercruyssen (CO 3Sqn/2 Wing) unhurt.
    (411:10 hrs)
    240851 Cat.2 at …
    290851 Transferred from 2 Wing to ARS/Wevelgem. (529:50 hrs)
    170652 Transferred from ARS/Wevelgem to Fairey (530:15 hrs)
    110554 Transferred from ARS/Wevelgem to JVS/ECh (IQ-W) (532:45 hrs)
    210954 Struck of Charge (629:05 hrs.) with engine Griffon 65 n° 4750.
    181054 written-off
    57 To scrapdealer Dewachter at Oostende, it was placed on the roof of his premises (together
    with SG108) with its wings sawn off.
    030367 shipped to J.Denis Kay/Manchester Tankers Ltd, Charnock Richard, Lancashire,
    England (UK) (transported by road via Zeebrugge-Dover) where it arrived the next day.
    (stored)
    220369 sold to A.W.Francis, Southend Airport (transported by road and placed in open storage)
    9-78 John Lowe&Larry Matt, Riverside, Illinois, USA, stored in Victory Air Museum,
    Mundelein, Illinois.
    Early80s The museum closed and John Lowe took ownership of another Spitfire and full
    ownership of SG25 passed on to Larry Matt.
    82-85 Larry Matt, Chicago, Illinois, started with the restauration
    (wings of Mk.XVIII HS649 Indian Air Force were used)
    87 sold to Don L.Knapp/DK Precision, Fort Lauderdale, Florida, USA.
    91 To Lone Star Museum, Galvestone, Texas
    000300 stored High Wycombe (or Walter’s Ash, north-west of Naphill (Buckinghamshire)
    000102 noted stored High Wycombe
    000304 l/n stored High Wycombe
    000405 departed High Wycombe for Airframe Assemblies, Sandown, Isle of Wight, stored pending restoration to flying condition
    000306 l/n stored Sandown
    300309 registered G-JNMA, Paul Marcus Andrews, 17 Queen Street, Londonw W1J5PH

    That suggests that this was a Mk.XIV and as such perhaps not the best candidate for a two-seat conversion. Also the c/n appears to be different from the one you saw. I cannot vouch for the accuracy of this of course.

    in reply to: Seen in an Austrian bar……… #855216
    Archer
    Participant

    Agree on the F-27 but the blades appear a bit short. Cropped perhaps? The panel looks more like an overhead panel of some sort, the orange panels are perhaps just additions to cover some big holes.

    in reply to: Patrouille Suisse F-5 collision: 2 pilots OK #855357
    Archer
    Participant

    For those of you who don’t read Dutch: The F-5 that landed was missing 70% of its righthand horizontal stabiliser. The other aircraft came down in a small lake while the pilot ended up in a glasshouse, he was transported to the local hospital and is doing well considering the circumstances.

Viewing 15 posts - 391 through 405 (of 1,614 total)