dark light

Archer

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 406 through 420 (of 1,614 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Bruntingthorpe Cold War jets open day #860424
    Archer
    Participant

    I wasn’t able to be there but this video helps….

    in reply to: By Stearman Uk to Oz / across US + accident #868169
    Archer
    Participant

    Aviatrix’s 1942 Boeing Stearman aircraft is made from wood and plastic

    That’ll be easy to fix then… 😉

    But seriously, it is good to hear that they walked away from that.

    in reply to: Gnat Display Team Crash 2015, Report out May 2016 #869182
    Archer
    Participant

    Can someone explain how an aircraft travelling at 300knts can have a greater rate of descent with the application of pitch (which sounds counter intuitive), and is this a known trait of the Gnat ?

    If the application of pitch is such that it brings the wing past its critical angle of attack, then the flow on the top surface detaches, the lift produced by the wing decreases and because of this the effect of gravity and inertia combine to increase the rate of descent. That is a known trait of aeroplanes in general, not just the Gnat. This particular Gnat wasn’t travelling at 300 kt but even if it was, you can stall an aircraft at any speed.

    in reply to: Gnat Display Team Crash 2015, Report out May 2016 #870678
    Archer
    Participant

    Consequentially he didn’t have fast jet experience in the RAF, his first fast jet experience was as a PPL.

    From the report, that certainly seems to be the case. But let’s not forget that his training in the RAF was leading to a fast jet. The hours he flew on the Bulldog and Tucano and all the exercises carried out were designed to prepare him for a Hawk or similar. The Tucano in particular is meant to be a natural precursor to a trainer like the Hawk or Gnat. I would argue that the hours he flew on the JP and Gnat after obtaining his PPL were a natural extension of the training he had undertaken up to that point. The fact that he held a civil license at that point is not all that relevant I think.

    Knowing that jet hours are pretty expensive, he does not seem to have skimped on the training he did prior to operating the JP and Gnat on the display circuit. Over the years summarised in the report he flew 218 hours on the Gnat and 39 hours in the JP. It may not have made him the most experienced Gnat pilot out there but to me it seems like a pretty thorough experience together with his RAF hours. Another thing that strikes me is that (over the years summarised) he exclusively flew these jets and therefore would not have suffered from any problems converting between aircraft with a very different performance level.

    Just my 0.02.

    in reply to: Gloster Gauntlet …flying ! #873575
    Archer
    Participant

    Lovely footage! I like the fact that the paintwork on the cowling doesn’t look ‘new’, somehow it looks the part.

    in reply to: Farnborough Air Sciences Trust #885036
    Archer
    Participant

    I visited FAST last October, well worth the trip!

    in reply to: Positive changes ahead at Brooklands #899187
    Archer
    Participant

    John, I can agree with you that indeed the whole site could and should have been saved when BAe left. That was before my association with the museum though so I cannot comment on how that situation was handled.

    in reply to: Positive changes ahead at Brooklands #899474
    Archer
    Participant

    It is worth remembering that the area now covered by Mercedes Benz World was never owned by the museum. They used it for storing two airliners and when needed for fly-ins or car events but could not claim it. In the early 00s the options were therefore limited, and the development of Mercedes Benz world has at least ensured that no more large corporate buildings will go up. Also, the area that was always the center of the site is now again used to play with high performance cars. In a sense it has restored some of the pre-WWII atmosphere of Brooklands.

    I know that the museum in its current state may not be to everyone’s liking, but a lot is being done to improve it and has already been done over the past years. Be assured that after the current ‘Re-engineering Brooklands’ project the large airliners will certainly be next in line for some attention. Currently a lot of effort is going into this large project: aircraft in the Wellington hangar are being dismantled ready for moving, the Valiant cockpit section is undergoing restoration, same as the VC10 fuselage test section. And that is on top of the ongoing work on the various aircraft.

    in reply to: Kestrel XS 691 (XV6A 64-18265) status? #902513
    Archer
    Participant

    I did not know that, thanks! Guess I need to go there one day to complete my photo collection of ‘Senkrechtstarters’.

    in reply to: Kestrel XS 691 (XV6A 64-18265) status? #902889
    Archer
    Participant

    Two of the Dorniers are still around actually. Three were built with the second one being a non-flier that did not survive. Both the fliers have been preserved, E1 that only flew with the two Pegasus engines is at the Dornier museum at Friedrichshafen:
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]244835[/ATTACH]
    E3, the aircraft that had all the engines installed and performed all the vertical takeoffs, landings and transitions is at the Deutsches Museum Flugwerft Schleissheim:
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]244836[/ATTACH]
    And while we’re at it: here’s the VFW VAK 191B, which is also at Schleissheim:
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]244837[/ATTACH]
    And the EWR VJ 101C X2 at the Deutsches Museum Munich:
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]244838[/ATTACH]

    in reply to: Taxiing Accident — FG-1D and A6M2 #904114
    Archer
    Participant

    Well… you could argue that at least most Spitfire and Mustang projects start with a collection of metal remains and an identity for the wreck. This aircraft appears to have been started from scratch, with a few original landing gear parts thrown in to provide a tenuous link to an original aircraft.

    Perhaps we should not open this can of worms…..:rolleyes:

    in reply to: B29 Superfortress and the atomic bomb #906462
    Archer
    Participant

    Into 1960s UK MoD guessed programme total R&D costs against a formula of £ per pound weight.

    Going slightly off-topic, but would you happen to have a reference for that point? Was this on purely experimental projects, military type procurement or also on civil a/c modified for military use?

    in reply to: The 1000mph Barrier #910863
    Archer
    Participant

    Nice photos Ken, that first one of the BAC221 is strikingly similar to one of mine!

    Edit: You can never have too many photos of pretty blue aeroplanes.
    https://farm2.staticflickr.com/1637/25097698223_020e840ea0_o.jpg
    BAC221_Yeovilton_July2006 by Jelle Hieminga, on Flickr

    in reply to: The 1000mph Barrier #910913
    Archer
    Participant

    https://farm2.staticflickr.com/1582/25695879126_043ff647b1_b.jpgFD2_Cosford_270216 by Jelle Hieminga, on Flickr

    Still a great looking aircraft.

    in reply to: Tempest mark2? #911406
    Archer
    Participant

    Someone at the BBMF told me the Germans were not happy with the Eurofighter being named the Typhoon! Bad associations I suppose!

    Could it be to do with this one?
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]244657[/ATTACH]
    I guess we need someone from that end of Europe to explain it. I can see two connections to that name but the real reason might be completely different again.

Viewing 15 posts - 406 through 420 (of 1,614 total)