As the area aft of the rear spar on a Catalina wing is cloth covered, incorporating them in the design would be tricky and incur a huge weight penalty.
Well that lens blows my 100-400 L out of the water.I know i hadn’t got it set up but still nowhere near the clarity you have.
I believe Photoshop may also be a factor in that comparison:
Lovely photos of a great aircraft.
From the video it seems you have a bit of unbalance in the prop spinner as well. This could work its way back to the driveshaft and put a vibration on the pump/motor.
Could it perhaps be based on this story: http://www.vc10.net/Memories/everything_raf.html#Something%20you%20won%27t%20see%20everyday
Beaten to it!
Wasn’t ‘806 the one that suffered a ground fuelling era that saw it being ultimately scrapped?
Correct, the story with photos is behind that link. The forward fuselage of ‘806 soldiered on for 10 more years as a battle damage repair trainer at BZN. It was finally scrapped in October of last year. There are two small bits still around though: a galley unit and a piece of freight door (photos on the site).
Thanks for the photo, I’m glad to see they do. XR806 “George Thompson” is a particular interest of mine. An old friend of mine, sadly now passed away, trained with Thompson and always related the story of his VC to me.
Is XR806 due anytime soon or has it already left service?? I’d love a final photo before she’s due to be “recycled”.
I’m afraid she’s no more, as for final photos, see here: http://www.vc10.net/History/incidents_and_accidents.html#XR806%20Brize%20Norton%2018%20December%201997
Do they still carry the names of the VC’s ?
They do:
The ones now at Brunty were named:
XR807 Donald Garland VC and Thomas Grey VC
XV109 Arthur Scarf VC
pagen01 the blue ribbon can still be seen on the photos on the previous page. It does appear faded though in the last shot of that series.
Anyone know who is ‘processing’ them?
There is a part I’m after that I can’t even get from work!
Great photos Nick, shame about those ugly wing-engined ones getting in the frames though 😉
I cannot find the Panther on my photos, but I do have one of the Cougar, see below. This was taken in 2002.
I would hazard a guess at -TEF from looking at the full size photo.
KLM never uses the J in a registration sequence. The Q is also avoided. This to avoid confusion as they resemble an I or O. They do use these letters on other items though, an airplane model bought from KLM will have a registration ending with a J while the simulators at Schiphol sport a reg ending in Q.
I don’t have more information than what you see below the photos. As for cruising altitudes, there are a lot of ex-mil jets active in the US and those altitudes are not uncommon I think. Obviously you should do this IFR.
My guess is that the combination of an IFR pilot in an IFR aircraft made the pilot ‘forget’ the VFR restriction. There was a 1200 ft ceiling with 3 miles visibility, not really weather for a VFR flight in such a high performance jet.
Allright, that means that I was a bit quick in assuming that this example is still around. N24WJ is still registered and in the list I posted but obviously I should not have counted it as ‘potentially airworthy’.
I’m sure that I’ve seen photos of an airworthy F9F in good nick in magazines say a year or 5 to 10 ago. Which one could this have been? Or am I imagining things?
Edit: Solved it already, the one I remember is this one:
http://www.airliners.net/photo/Grumman-F9F-3-Panther/0742079/L/
http://www.airliners.net/photo/Grumman-F9F-2-Panther/0916176/L/
and here’s what happened to it in 1996 (I thought it was more recent): http://www.airliners.net/photo/Grumman-F9F-2-Panther/0986772/L/
The aircraft is no longer on the register, damaged beyond repair it seems.
85 is not a bad achievement in itself. RIP.
There is a free e-book about the X-15 program on the Nasa site here: http://www.aeronautics.nasa.gov/ebooks/index.htm
Might be worth checking out to see what Mr. White achieved.
The Cavanaugh one is on the FAA registry:
http://registry.faa.gov/aircraftinquiry/NNum_Results.aspx?NNumbertxt=9525A
Looks like it hasn’t flown since 1997.
There are 7 airframes on the FAA register (http://registry.faa.gov/aircraftinquiry/AcftRef_Results.aspx?Mfrtxt=&Modeltxt=F9F&PageNo=1), with 2 airworthy or near that condition (my guess, the World Jet example and the Cavanaugh one).