Just a thought to add to this discussion, but some of the Fuji cameras have an ‘iso boost’ setting that automatically chooses a higher ISO setting to get you a good shutter speed. From my memory it should be off when in Auto or P mode, but since I don’t own a Fuji myself, I could be wrong there. And if I am 😉 , then this could introduce noise into the image without the photographer knowing or intending to do this.
I think that Coppermine is free: http://coppermine-gallery.net/index.php
I haven’t tried it myself but it looks quite good, lots of features and with the ability to get it to look just like you want it to.
The answer (along with some photos) is on this thread: http://forum.keypublishing.co.uk/showthread.php?t=54649
It is indeed the TFC Fiat CR.42.
Hangar 5 is indeed open, and it looked as if hangar 6 was underway as well, but I need someone to explain the positioning of the 707 and DC-9 to me (if that’s what they are) :p
I was in Madrid just over a week ago and managed to visit Cuatro Vientos too. Well worth the trip I might add!
I was going to post some photos, but I can’t add much to Lince’s gallery apart from ones taken in ****ty weather :p
How high can you go….
This one gets pretty close to the answer:
Looks like a T-6 conversion. Interesting photo but I’m no Zero expert I’m afraid.
A good photo to post as a tribute would be the VC10 taxiing at Farnborough with freight door open and Rolls-Royce in view. I don’t have it online though, don’t know if anyone else has.
RIP.
I cannot give you the answer from my memory, but I do know where to find it! (Helpful chap aren’t I :p )
I haven’t got the book here otherwise I would be happy to look it up, but Jeffrey Quill’s ‘Spitfire, a Test Pilot’s story’ very elaborately describes the development of the Spitfire from Mk.I to Mk.24 and beyond. I’m sure someone with a better memory will answer your question in due course, but if the subject interests you I would suggest getting hold of a copy.
That is very sad news. I too was at the forum meet at East Fortune, and as it was one of only two occasions that I got to meet some forum members I sure remember the names and faces from that day.
What else is there to say, my thoughts go out to his friends and relatives.
Choosing a camera is a bit like choosing a car. You’ll need to consider budget, needs, wanted options and the type of use it is going to get. Also you need to factor in that some buyers favour specific brands for different reasons. Try getting a Jaguar driver into a Toyota 😉
On the camera scale there are a lot of options these days, and that makes choosing difficult. First thing to do I think is to set a budget for yourself, consider what you would like to spend. If you find out at a later stage that your needs cannot be met by that budget, you could either lower your requirements, or re-evaluate with your bank/spouse/consience. For now it will narrow the field a bit, which helps.
Next thing is to evaluate your needs, what kind of photos will you be taking? If you’re into aviation photography then you will automatically need to think about a lens with a decent zoom factor. You can get this two ways: either go for a fixed lens camera with a large zoom lens (the ‘ultra zoom’ cameras) or go for an SLR. I would recommend the first option for a beginning photographer, and the dSLR for someone who already has some SLR experience, or the advanced amateur.
More megapixels does not always mean better photos. For a sensor size that stays the same, cramming more pixels onto them means that you will get more noise issues. Sensors are getting better each day of course, but the newest 11 megapixel compact would never be on my wishlist, as I very much doubt if it will deliver a smooth image. The next major quality issue (if not the most important one) is the lens. Bigger and better glass means better photos, it’s that simple. A small compact camera has a lens which rarely measures more than an inch across. Zoom this thing out to its longest setting and you’ll have a long dark tube that the light will need to travel through to find the sensor. Get a camera with a larger lens (diameter-wise) and a lot more light will get through, meaning better performance on cloudy days or indoors.
As for choosing a dSLR, you will find that there are Canon supporters, and Nikon supporters. Both can deliver a good camera that will take great photos, but each will have their own advantages and disadvantages. Argueing about this will never leave you with a firm “this one is better” opinion. Generally a more expensive camera will have more options, give better performance and also a more expensive lens will be sharper and takes better photos. This is why I mentioned the budget at the beginning! Once you have decided to go for a dSLR you will very quickly end up on the sloping road towards spending more and more on your camera gear but once you’re in this market segment there are no really bad cameras so a Canon 300D or Nikon D50 might be just as good a camera for your purposes as a top of the line 1D mkII or D2H. Read reviews, talk to people who know these cameras, try them out in shops and make sure you evaluate these cameras against your requirements, not just against the “it would be great to own one” argument. Also factor in the accessories you will need, the camera is the main part of the cost, but not the only one, especially with a dSLR where you might want another lens or a large flash.
Remember that you can still get a very nice camera without going the dSLR route. This is just an example, but a Fuji S5600 will give you a nice large 38-380mm (35mm equivalent) lens that will easily take a nice aeroplane photo. It sells for a lot less than a Canon 350D, and might therefore be a better starting point for some people.
The story from the guide when I was there was that no pilot wanted to fly it, and so it was suspended from the ceiling. I suspect that it was a bit tongue-in-cheek but who knows, perhaps they would consider a trade/sell. I wouldn’t be surprised if Kermit says no to that though.
Photos of the arrival at the Aviodrome are on this site. Click on the Viggen photo to find them (or click here for a direct link, you won’t get the site navigation menu this way though).
I have been in touch with the RAF Museum on this and they replied that:
The press release … was an unauthorised and therefore inaccurate release.
At the moment, I can confirm that both British Airways and the Royal Air Force Museum Board of Trustees are together, currently reviewing the future status of the aircraft in the British Airways Collection at the Museum’s site in Cosford. Discussions have barely started and the review is ongoing.
While this doesn’t tell us much that is new, I find it surprising that a press release, however inaccurate it seems to be, did find its way out. The basic message also seems to be the same: ‘we are reviewing the future prospects’. I guess it still makes sense to keep an eye on the developments, and to let the RAFM and BA know that we are concerned for the future well-being of the airframes.
The famous press-release was re-posted a page or two back, but seems to have disappeared again. Feel free to to read the copied version on my forum.(Link removed by Moggy) Nobody has asked me to remove it yet so it will stay there.
As for the insides of the VC10, they were definitively empty in 2000, as that was when I took this photo: